Sensitivity and specificity of color duplex ultrasound measurement in the estimation of internal carotid artery stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Division of Vascular Surgery, McMaster University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Journal of Vascular Surgery (Impact Factor: 2.98). 07/2005; 41(6):962-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.02.044
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Duplex ultrasound is widely used for the diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis. Standard duplex ultrasound criteria for the grading of internal carotid artery stenosis do not exist; thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the relation between the degree of internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex ultrasound criteria and degree of stenosis by angiography.
Data were gathered from Medline from January 1966 to January 2003, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, ACP Journal Club, UpToDate, reference lists, and authors' files. Inclusion criteria were the comparison of color duplex ultrasound results with angiography by the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial method; peer-reviewed publications, and >/=10 adults.
Variables extracted included internal carotid artery peak systolic velocity, internal carotid artery end diastolic velocity, internal carotid artery/common carotid artery peak systolic velocity ratio, sensitivity and specificity of duplex ultrasound scanning for internal carotid artery stenosis by angiography. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) criteria were used to assess study quality. Sensitivity and specificity for duplex ultrasound criteria were combined as weighted means by using a random effects model. The threshold of peak systolic velocity >/=130 cm/s is associated with sensitivity of 98% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 97% to 100%) and specificity of 88% (95% CI, 76% to 100%) in the identification of angiographic stenosis of >/=50%. For the diagnosis of angiographic stenosis of >/=70%, a peak systolic velocity >/=200 cm/s has a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI, 84% to 94%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI, 88% to 97%). For each duplex ultrasound threshold, measurement properties vary widely between laboratories, and the magnitude of the variation is clinically important. The heterogeneity observed in the measurement properties of duplex ultrasound may be caused by differences in patients, study design, equipment, techniques or training.
Clinicians need to be aware of the limitations of duplex ultrasound scanning when making management decisions.


Available from: Catherine M Clase, Mar 21, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stroke remains the leading cause of permanent disability. Embolic stroke due to severe carotid artery stenosis can be preventable. In this article, we review the management of carotid artery stenosis and examine the role of carotid artery screening in primary and secondary stroke prevention. Carotid duplex ultrasonography is the screening test of choice for the detection of carotid artery stenosis in asymptomatic patients at risk for atherosclerosis. Screening to detect carotid artery stenosis is currently not recommended for asymptomatic patients who do not have risk factors. Carotid endarterectomy remains the standard therapy for all symptomatic patients with moderate to severe carotid artery stenosis. Carotid stenting is a comparable alternative treatment in symptomatic patients deemed high-risk for carotid endarterectomy either due to medical or anatomical reasons. For screened asymptomatic patients found to have severe carotid artery stenosis, carotid endarterectomy is justifiable.
    Seminars in Roentgenology 10/2014; 50(2). DOI:10.1053/ · 1.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is an important diagnostic tool in many interventions, particularly coronary and carotid artery angioplasty and stenting. In contrast, its application in the management of diseases of the cerebral venous system remains an unexplored territory. We report three patients in whom IVUS was used during angiography for the evaluation of venous flow obstruction secondary to venous sinus thrombosis, venous sinus stenosis, and a transverse sinus mass lesion, respectively. In addition, we review current literature to summarize previous experience, focusing on the advantages and limitations of IVUS technology in interventional cardiology, carotid artery disease, and venous disease. CASE DESCRIPTIONS: In all three cases, IVUS was used without any complications and provided critical information that guided further management of these distinct diseases. IVUS helped diagnose the presence of intraluminal thrombus, severe stenosis, and a mass lesion in the transverse sinuses and also helped assess the response to angioplasty of the stenotic regions. CONCLUSIONS: IVUS is a promising tool that has potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and to guide the management of several diseases of the cerebral venous system. The cases we describe suggest that IVUS can be successfully used when performing endovascular interventions in patients with obstruction of venous outflow secondary to venous sinus stenosis, thrombosis, or mass lesions.
    World Neurosurgery 04/2012; DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.04.004 · 2.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Journal of Vascular Surgery 08/2008; 48(1):112-3. DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.065 · 2.98 Impact Factor