Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes

Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States
Science (Impact Factor: 31.48). 07/2005; 308(5728):1623-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1110589
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We show that inferences of competence based solely on facial appearance predicted the outcomes of U.S. congressional elections better than chance (e.g., 68.8% of the Senate races in 2004) and also were linearly related to the margin of victory. These inferences were specific to competence and occurred within a 1-second exposure to the faces of the candidates. The findings suggest that rapid, unreflective trait inferences can contribute to voting choices, which are widely assumed to be based primarily on rational and deliberative considerations.

  • International Journal of Public Opinion Research 03/2011; 24(1):1-20. DOI:10.1093/ijpor/edr040 · 1.00 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This chapter reviews a research programme on the effects of humour in advertising on positive and negative brand associations and brand choice, and integrates the findings into a single overarching model. Based on the Associative and Propositional Processes Model of Evaluation (Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006, 2007, 2011), we propose that repeated pairings of a novel brand with brand-unrelated humour forms positive brand associations, which mediate spontaneous brand choice. This associative process was found to be independent from the level of distraction posed by humour and from awareness of the stimulus pairings. In fact the distraction posed by humour benefits persuasion by preventing negative brand associations. Previous marketing research, which mainly viewed humour as a cue in peripheral processing, was rather pessimistic about the persuasive impact of humour. In contrast, this research programme suggests that a repeated pairing of a brand with humour affects the brand’s underlying associative structure, which may lead to stable attitude changes that guide overt spontaneous brand choice. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
    European Review of Social Psychology 12/2013; 24(1):32-69. DOI:10.1080/10463283.2013.822215 · 2.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this note I concisely present the main arguments advanced in "Taking Liberties" (2012). In particular, I look at the philosophical roots of libertarian paternalism. I examine whether the claims that it constitutes the "real Third Way" and that it always should be preferred to 'harder' forms of paternalism are justified, and I propose that interventions aimed at improving, rather than 'nudging', human cognitive abilities may be more consonant with a truly libertarian programme. I also discuss whether the easy reversibility of 'nudges', which is often mentioned as one of its most desirable features, is truly as important and effective as generally thought.
    Journal of Consumer Policy 09/2014; 37(3):357-396. DOI:10.1007/s10603-014-9265-1

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 21, 2014