Article

A meta-analysis of time-series studies of ozone and mortality with comparison to the national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study

School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 6.18). 08/2005; 16(4):436-45. DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000165817.40152.85
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although many time-series studies of ozone and mortality have identified positive associations, others have yielded null or inconclusive results, making the results of these studies difficult to interpret.
We performed a meta-analysis of 144 effect estimates from 39 time-series studies, and estimated pooled effects by lags, age groups, cause-specific mortality, and concentration metrics. We compared results with pooled estimates from the National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study (NMMAPS), a time-series study of 95 large U.S. urban centers from 1987 to 2000.
Both meta-analysis and NMMAPS results provided strong evidence of a short-term association between ozone and mortality, with larger effects for cardiovascular and respiratory mortality, the elderly, and current-day ozone exposure. In both analyses, results were insensitive to adjustment for particulate matter and model specifications. In the meta-analysis, a 10-ppb increase in daily ozone at single-day or 2-day average of lags 0, 1, or 2 days was associated with an 0.87% increase in total mortality (95% posterior interval = 0.55% to 1.18%), whereas the lag 0 NMMAPS estimate is 0.25% (0.12% to 0.39%). Several findings indicate possible publication bias: meta-analysis results were consistently larger than those from NMMAPS; meta-analysis pooled estimates at lags 0 or 1 were larger when only a single lag was reported than when estimates for multiple lags were reported; and heterogeneity of city-specific estimates in the meta-analysis were larger than with NMMAPS.
This study provides evidence of short-term associations between ozone and mortality as well as evidence of publication bias.

1 Bookmark
 · 
177 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Both nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ozone (O3) are powerful oxidants in ambient air that are intimately linked through atmospheric chemistry and which continuously interchange over very short timescales. Based upon atmospheric chemistry alone, there is a strong, a priori, reason for considering O3 and NO2 together in epidemiological studies, rather than either of the two pollutants separately in single-pollutant models. This paper compares two approaches to this, using Ox, defined as O3 + NO2, as a single metric and also using O3 and NO2 together in two-pollutant models. We hypothesised that the magnitude of the association between Ox and daily mortality would be greater than for NO2 and O3 individually. Using collocated hourly measurements for O3 and NO2 in London, from 2000 to 2005, we carried out a time series analysis of daily mortality. We investigated O3, NO2 and Ox individually in single-pollutant Poisson regression models and NO2 and O3 jointly in two-pollutant models in both all-year and season-specific analyses. We observed larger associations for mean 24-h concentrations of Ox (1.30 % increase in mortality per 10 ppb) than for O3 (0.87 %) and NO2 (0 %) individually. However, when analysed jointly in two-pollutant models, associations for O3 (1.54 %) and NO2 (1.07 %) were comparable to the Ox association. Season-specific analyses broadly followed this pattern irrespective of whether the Ox concentrations were driven by O3 production (summer) or depletion (winter). This novel approach in air pollution epidemiology captures the simultaneous impact of both oxidants whilst avoiding many of the statistical issues associated with two-pollutant models and potentially simplifies health impact calculations.
    Air Quality Atmosphere & Health 12/2014; 7(4):407-414. DOI:10.1007/s11869-014-0249-8 · 1.46 Impact Factor
  • Nature Climate Change 08/2014; 4(10):917-923. DOI:10.1038/nclimate2342 · 15.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Context: Exposure to ozone has acute respiratory effects, but few human clinical studies have evaluated cardiovascular effects. We hypothesized that ozone exposure alters pulmonary and systemic vascular function, and cardiac function, with more pronounced effects in subjects with impaired antioxidant defense from deletion of the glutathione-S-transferase M1 gene (GSTM1 null). Twenty-four young, healthy never-smoker subjects (12 GSTM1 null) inhaled filtered air, 100 ppb ozone and 200 ppb ozone for 3 h, with intermittent exercise, in a double-blind, randomized, crossover fashion. Exposures were separated by at least 2 weeks. Vital signs, spirometry, arterial and venous blood nitrite levels, impedance cardiography, peripheral arterial tonometry, estimation of pulmonary capillary blood volume (Vc), and blood microparticles and platelet activation were measured at baseline and during 4 h after each exposure. Ozone inhalation decreased lung function immediately after exposure (mean ± standard error change in FEV1, air: -0.03 ± 0.04 L; 200 ppb ozone: -0.30 ± 0.07 L; p < 0.001). The immediate post-exposure increase in blood pressure, caused by the final 15-min exercise period, was blunted by 200 ppb ozone exposure (mean ± standard error change for air: 16.7 ± 2.6 mmHg; 100 ppb ozone: 14.5 ± 2.4 mmHg; 200 ppb ozone: 8.5 ± 2.5 mmHg; p = 0.02). We found no consistent effects of ozone on any other measure of cardiac or vascular function. All results were independent of the GSTM1 genotype. We did not find convincing evidence for early acute adverse cardiovascular consequences of ozone exposure in young healthy adults. The ozone-associated blunting of the blood pressure response to exercise is of unclear clinical significance.
    Inhalation Toxicology 02/2015; 27(2):113-9. DOI:10.3109/08958378.2014.996272 · 1.89 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
3 Downloads
Available from