Article

A meta-analysis of time-series studies of ozone and mortality with comparison to the National Morbidity, Mortality and Air Pollution Study

School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Epidemiology (Impact Factor: 6.18). 08/2005; 16(4):436-45. DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000165817.40152.85
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although many time-series studies of ozone and mortality have identified positive associations, others have yielded null or inconclusive results, making the results of these studies difficult to interpret.
We performed a meta-analysis of 144 effect estimates from 39 time-series studies, and estimated pooled effects by lags, age groups, cause-specific mortality, and concentration metrics. We compared results with pooled estimates from the National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study (NMMAPS), a time-series study of 95 large U.S. urban centers from 1987 to 2000.
Both meta-analysis and NMMAPS results provided strong evidence of a short-term association between ozone and mortality, with larger effects for cardiovascular and respiratory mortality, the elderly, and current-day ozone exposure. In both analyses, results were insensitive to adjustment for particulate matter and model specifications. In the meta-analysis, a 10-ppb increase in daily ozone at single-day or 2-day average of lags 0, 1, or 2 days was associated with an 0.87% increase in total mortality (95% posterior interval = 0.55% to 1.18%), whereas the lag 0 NMMAPS estimate is 0.25% (0.12% to 0.39%). Several findings indicate possible publication bias: meta-analysis results were consistently larger than those from NMMAPS; meta-analysis pooled estimates at lags 0 or 1 were larger when only a single lag was reported than when estimates for multiple lags were reported; and heterogeneity of city-specific estimates in the meta-analysis were larger than with NMMAPS.
This study provides evidence of short-term associations between ozone and mortality as well as evidence of publication bias.

1 Follower
 · 
186 Views
  • Source
    • "Sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) and ground-level ozone (O 3 ) are important criteria air pollutants. A number of epidemiological studies suggest an association between short-and long-term exposure to SO 2 , NO 2 and O 3 and increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital admissions for cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases including acute myocardial infarction and arrhythmias (Künzli et al., 1997; Burnett et al., 1998, 1999, 2004; Stieb et al., 2002; Bell et al., 2005; Ruidavets et al., 2005; Dockery et al., 2005; Neuberger et al., 2007; Latza et al., 2009). They are also associated with acid deposition and photochemical smog (Cooper and Alley, 2002; Cox, 2003). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A field performance evaluation of Maxxam passive samplers was carried out for ambient concentrations of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ground-level ozone (O3). Monthly passive and hourly continuous air monitoring data from four regional air monitoring networks in Alberta, Canada were evaluated over a 5-year period (2006–2010). Monthly concentrations were relatively low, ranging from 0.1 to 3.9 ppb, 0.2 to 18.1 ppb and 10.1 to 56.1 ppb for SO2, NO2 and O3, respectively. From duplicate passive sampling, geometric mean precision values were 17.9%, 14.8% and 4.7% for SO2, NO2 and O3, respectively. Geometric mean of the relative error (as a measure of accuracy) was 30% (median = 33%, interquartile range, IQR 15–63%) for SO2 and 32% (median = 33%, IQR = 25–64%) for NO2. O3 measurements had a better measure of accuracy with a geometic mean relative error of 12% (median = 17%, IQR = 9–30%) and met the acceptable level recommended by United States National Institute of Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the European Union (EU) Directive (±25%). From reduced major axis (RMA) analysis, bias (systematic error) is apparent in the Maxxam passive samplers in the field resulting in overestimation of ambient SO2 and O3 concentrations and underestimation of NO2 concentrations relative to continuous analyzers. Seasonal influences were observed for accuracy of passive SO2 and O3 measurements. A poor association was found between passive versus continuous concentrations for SO2 and O3 during the winter and the summer, respectively.
    Atmospheric Environment 05/2015; 114:39–47. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.031 · 3.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Insufficiently adjusting for the seasonal variability of mortality can cause time series models to overestimate mortality risk, and we believe this led to the significant differences in the risk estimates. The magnitude of our risk estimates, however, was in better agreement with that of many other epidemiological studies assessing short-term association of ozone and mortality (Bell et al., 2004, 2005; Ito et al., 2005; Levy et al., 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many time-series studies have characterized the relationship between short-term ozone exposure and adverse health outcomes, controlling for temperature as a confounder. Temperature may also modify ozone effects, though this has been largely under-investigated. In this study, we explored whether temperature modifies the effect of short-term ozone exposure on mortality. We used the database developed for the National Morbidity and Mortality Air Pollution Study to estimate ozone mortality risks in 97 US cities in May through September, 1987–2000. We treated temperature as a confounder as well as an effect modifier by estimating risks at low, moderate, and high temperature categories. When temperature was treated as a confounder, a 10-ppb increase in daily 24-h ozone was associated with a 0.47% (95% CI: 0.19%–0.76%) increase in mortality. When we assessed effect modification by temperature, the interaction between ozone and temperature was not statistically signif-icant. However, there was a U-shaped pattern in mortality risk, which was greater at the low (b 25th percentile) and high (N 75th percentile) temperature levels than moderate temperature levels. At the high temperature category, a 10% increase in AC prevalence mitigated mortality risk associated with 10-ppb of ozone exposure by − 0.18% (95% CI: − 0.35%, − 0.02%). Furthermore, ozone mortality risk in the high temperature category increased as we restricted our analyses to hotter days. On days where temperatures exceeded the 75th, 90th, and 95th percentile temperatures, a 10-ppb increase in ozone was associated with a 0.65% (95% CI: 0.20%– 1.09%), 0.83% (95% CI: 0.17%–1.48%), and 1.35% (95% CI: 0.44%–2.27%) increase in mortality, respectively. These results suggested that high temperatures may exacerbate physiological responses to short-term ozone exposure.
    Environment International 08/2014; 73. DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2014.07.009 · 5.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "for cardiovascular mortality; and 0.47% (95% CI, −0.51%–1.47%) for respiratory mortality19. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bayesian statistical inference with a case-crossover design was used to examine the effects of air pollutants {Particulate matter <10 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM10), sulphur dioxide (SO2), and ozone (O3)} on mortality. We found that all air pollutants had significant short-term impacts on non-accidental mortality. An increase of 10 μg/m(3) in PM10, 10 ppb in O3, 1 ppb in SO2 were associated with a 0.40% (95% posterior interval (PI): 0.22, 0.59%), 0.78% (95% PI: 0.20, 1.35%) and 0.34% (95% PI: 0.17, 0.50%) increase of non-accidental mortality, respectively. O3 air pollution is significantly associated with cardiovascular mortality, while PM10 is significantly related to respiratory mortality. In general, the effects of all pollutants on all mortality types were higher in summer and winter than those in the rainy season. This study highlights the effects of exposure to air pollution on mortality risks in Thailand. Our findings support the Thailand government in aiming to reduce high levels of air pollution.
    Scientific Reports 07/2014; 4(5509):1-8. DOI:10.1038/srep05509 · 5.58 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview

Download
4 Downloads
Available from