Article

Comparison of the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB and BDProbeTec ET assays for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens

Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dept. of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology (Impact Factor: 4.23). 07/2005; 43(6):2563-6. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.6.2563-2566.2005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The performances of the BDProbeTec ET (Becton Dickinson) and COBAS AMPLICOR MTB (Roche) were retrospectively evaluated for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in various respiratory specimens. The BACTEC and MGIT liquid culture system (Becton Dickinson) was used as a reference method. A total of 824 respiratory specimens, comprised of sputa, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and bronchial and tracheal aspirates from 580 patients, were evaluated. Out of 824 clinical specimens, 109 specimens from 43 patients were culture positive for M. tuberculosis. Of these 109 specimens, 67 were smear positive, 85 were positive by the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB test, and 94 were positive by the BDProbeTec ET. Of the 715 culture-negative specimens, 17 were positive by the auramine staining, 11 were positive by the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB test, and 12 were positive by the BDProbeTec ET. After discrepancy analysis and review of the patients' clinical data, 130 specimens from 50 patients were considered "true-positive" specimens. This resulted in the following sensitivities: microscopy, 61.5%; COBAS AMPLICOR MTB test, 78.0%; and BDProbeTec ET, 86.2%. The specificities of each system, based on the clinical diagnosis, were 99.7% for microscopy, 99.9% for the COBAS AMPLICOR MTB test, and 99.9% for the BDProbeTec ET. The data presented represent a considerable number of specimens evaluated with a considerable number of culture- and auramine-positive and culture-positive and auramine-negative results and therefore give a realistic view of how the data should be interpreted in a daily routine situation. Specifically, the data with regard to the culture-positive and auramine-negative specimens are useful, because in a routine situation, auramine-negative specimens are sometimes accepted, on clinical indications, to be analyzed by an amplification method.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Hubert P Endtz, Jun 28, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
199 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article will review some of the recent developments for the rapid diagnosis and detection of drug resistance in tuberculosis. Tuberculosis remains one of the major causes of death from a single infectious agent worldwide. Of great concern for tuberculosis control is the emergence of drug resistance since there is no cure for some multidrug-resistant strains of M. tuberculosis, and there is concern that they may spread around the world, stressing the need for additional control measures such as new diagnostics and better drugs for treatment. Recent advances in molecular biology and a better understanding of the molecular basis of drug resistance have provided new tools for rapid tuberculosis diagnosis. Other non-conventional diagnostic approaches have also been proposed. Nucleic acid amplification techniques, both commercial and in-house, and non-molecular methods are being evaluated. The overall accuracy of most of these tests is promising and some of them can be easily implemented in clinical mycobacteriology laboratories. New genotypic and phenotypic methods for rapid diagnosis and detection of drug resistance have been developed and tested both in M. tuberculosis strains as well as in clinical samples. Further controlled evaluations are necessary in high-endemic countries for their eventual implementation in the routine diagnostic systems.
    Current opinion in pulmonary medicine 06/2006; 12(3):172-8. DOI:10.1097/01.mcp.0000219265.50310.9b · 2.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We evaluated GenoType Mycobacteria Direct (GTMD), a novel commercial assay based on nucleic acid sequence-based amplification technology, for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, M. avium, M. intracellulare, M. kansasii, and M. malmoense directly from clinical specimens. A total of 134 respiratory and extrapulmonary samples from 65 patients were processed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive values for GTMD were 92, 100, 100, and 77%, respectively. The GMTD technique is useful, reliable, and rapid when used during the normal routine of a clinical laboratory.
    Journal of Clinical Microbiology 09/2006; 44(8):3025-7. DOI:10.1128/JCM.00068-06 · 4.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim of the studyTo evaluate the sensitivity of PCR versus culture of complex tuberculosis mycobacteria and to determine the delay between PCR results and identification of mycobacteria in culture.
    Pathologie Biologie 10/2006; 54(8):488-492. DOI:10.1016/j.patbio.2006.07.028 · 1.07 Impact Factor