Article

Treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome and CIDP

Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System (Impact Factor: 2.5). 07/2005; 10(2):113-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1085-9489.2005.0010203.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating poly-(radiculo)neuropathy (CIDP) are immune-mediated disorders with a variable duration of progression and a range in severity of weakness. Infections can trigger GBS and exacerbate CIDP. Anti-ganglioside antibodies are important, but there is debate on the role of genetic factors in the pathogenesis of these disorders. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have shown that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange (PE) are effective in both GBS and CIDP. Most CIDP patients also improve after steroid therapy. Despite current treatment options, many patients have residual deficits or need to be treated for a long period of time. Therefore, new treatment trials are highly indicated. This review focuses on the current and possible new treatment options that could be guided by recent results from laboratory experiments.

1 Follower
 · 
240 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating poly(radiculo)neuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) are potentially treatable disorders. The use of appropriate assessment scales to evaluate the effects of treatment is essential. Recent therapeutic trials and the question of whether patients with mild disease or other variants of these disorders need to be treated are discussed. Recent clinical trials and Cochrane reviews give new information on the effect of various treatments in patients with GBS, CIDP and MMN. Intravenous immunoglobulin remains the only treatment proven to be effective in MMN. Combinations of treatment may be even more effective in GBS. Studies on prognostic factors related to improvement have been reported. Whether patients with Miller-Fisher syndrome or those with mild GBS should also be treated is still debated. New assessment scales at the disability and handicap level have now been evaluated for GBS and CIDP, and are ready for use. Results of studies in experimental models contribute to our understanding of the mechanism of action of intravenous immunoglobulin. Recent new information on the use of intravenous immunoglobulin and steroids indicates that the former should remain the cornerstone of treatment for GBS and MMN, and probably also for CIDP. Whether steroids not only suppress disease activity in CIDP but also eradicate the disease remains to be established. Some GBS patients have secondary deterioration or finally turn out to have CIDP; additional information in this group of patients may lead to more appropriate disease management. Most patients with CIDP and those with MMN need long-term treatment. New treatment strategies should now focus also on the effect and the costs of treatment over long-term follow up.
    Current Opinion in Neurology 11/2002; 15(5):623-31. DOI:10.1097/00019052-200210000-00014 · 5.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) suffer from excessive fatigue. To assess whether this fatigue might be related to changes in slow-conducting nerve fibers, we determined the conduction velocity distribution (CVD) in the median nerve. Thirteen fatigued but neurologically well-recovered GBS patients, 2 fatigued and stable CIDP patients, and 19 healthy controls participated in this study. Conventional maximal nerve conduction velocities (NCVs) did not show differences between GBS patients and healthy controls. However, in both GBS and CIDP patients the CVD was altered, showing significant narrowing of the velocity distribution with loss of the fastest- and slowest-conducting fibers. These changes were most pronounced in the subgroup of patients with the lowest fatigue scores. We therefore conclude that the observed CVD changes in patients are not likely to contribute to persisting complaints of fatigue after GBS.
    Muscle & Nerve 02/2006; 33(2):177-82. DOI:10.1002/mus.20451 · 2.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The occurrence of severe fatigue after Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and its relation with disease course, clinical characteristics, and antecedent infections was studied in 100 GBS patients. Severe fatigue, expressed as a mean Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) score of 5.0 or more, was present in 60% of all patients. It was more frequently present in females and in patients over 50 years (p < 0.01). There was no significant relationship between fatigue severity and the level of functional disability at nadir, antecedent events or infections, clinical variables, and time to follow-up after GBS.
    Journal of Neurology 10/2006; 253(9):1143-6. DOI:10.1007/s00415-006-0163-6 · 3.84 Impact Factor