Multiple drug class-wide resistance associated with poorer survival after treatment failure in a cohort of HIV-infected patients.

Clinical Department bLaboratory of Antiviral Drug Monitoring, National Institute of Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
AIDS (Impact Factor: 6.56). 08/2005; 19(10):1081-9. DOI: 10.1097/
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the effect of drug class-wide resistance (CWR) on survival in HIV-infected individuals who underwent genotypic resistance test after antiretroviral failure.
Observational, longitudinal cohort study.
HIV-infected individuals experiencing treatment failure were enrolled at first genotypic resistance test. End-points were death for any cause, AIDS-related death and AIDS-defining event/death. CWR was defined according to the International AIDS Society consensus. Survival analysis was performed with Cox's model.
Among 623 patients enrolled and followed for a median of 19 months (interquartile range, 12-29), Kaplan-Meier analyses for end-points at 48 months in patients with no CWR, one CWR, two CWR or three CWR were 8.9, 11.7, 13.4 and 27.1%, respectively, for death; 6.1, 9.9, 13.4 and 21.5%, respectively, for AIDS-related death; and 16.0, 17.7, 19.3 and 35.9%, respectively, for new AIDS event/death. In a multivariate Cox's model, higher HIV RNA level, previous AIDS and detection of three CWR (hazard ratio, 5.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.76-16.24) were all significantly associated with increased risk of death, while higher CD4 cell count and use of a new boosted protease inhibitor drug after identifying genotypic resistance were associated with reduced risk. Detection of three CWR was also significantly associated with higher risk of AIDS-related death and new AIDS event/death.
Even in the late era of highly effective antiretroviral treatments, detection of CWR, particularly if extended to all three drug classes is related to poorer clinical outcome and represents a risk-marker of disease progression and death.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Designing optimal antiretroviral (ARV) salvage regimens for multiclass drug-resistant, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients demands specific clinical skills. Our aim was to assess the virologic and immunologic effects of the treatment recommendations drafted by a peer advisory board to physicians caring for heavily ARV-experienced patients. We conducted a nationwide, HIV clinic-based, cohort study in Mexico. Adults infected with HIV were assessed for a median of 33 months (interquartile range [IQR] = 22-43 months). These patients had experienced the virologic failure of at least 2 prior ARV regimens and had detectable viremia while currently being treated; their physicians had received therapeutic advice, by a panel of experts, regarding the ARV salvage regimen. The primary endpoint was the incidence of loss of virologic response (plasma HIV-RNA levels of <200 copies per mL, followed by levels above this threshold) during the follow-up assessment using an observed-failure competing risks regression analysis. A total of 611 patients were observed (median ARV therapy exposure = 10.5 years; median prior regimens = 4). The probabilities of virologic failure were 11.9%, 14.4%, 16.9%, and 19.4% at the 12-, 24-, 36-, and 48-month follow-up assessments, respectively. Of the 531 patients who achieved a confirmed plasma HIV-RNA level below 200 copies per mL, the median increase in blood CD4(+) T-cell count was 162 cells per mL (IQR = 45-304 cells per mL). In routine practice, a high rate of patients with extensive ARV experience, who received an optimized salvage regimen recommended by a peer advisory committee, achieved a long-term sustained virologic response and immune reconstitution.
    09/2014; 1(2):ofu081. DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofu081
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The availability and access to potent antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) has brought drastic improvements in the mortality and morbidity and life expectancy of people living with HIV. Nevertheless, multi-drug ARV-resistance development is inevitable. Managing these patients; whose treatment goals are the same as naïve patients of suppressing viral load (VL) while increasing and sustaining high CD4+ T-cell count, remains challenging and complex. Protease Inhibitors (PI) are recommended for managing ‘Highly Treatment-Experienced’ HIV positive patients, especially, in combined (boosted-) form with another PI. This review compared the efficacy of recommended PI, boosted-Tipranavir (TPV), against other standard Protease Inhibitors in managing highly treatment-experienced HIV patients to reduce and sustain undetectable viral load levels. The ritonavir-boosted Tipranavir was showed higher efficacy rates than its comparators in achieving the desired goal.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Worldwide circulating HIV-1 genomes show extensive variation represented by different subtypes, polymorphisms and drug-resistant strains. Reports on the impact of sequence variation on antiretroviral therapy (ART) outcomes are mixed. In this review, we summarize relevant published data from both resource-rich and resource-limited countries in the last 10 years on the impact of HIV-1 sequence diversity on treatment outcomes. The prevalence of transmission of drug resistant mutations (DRMs) varies considerably, ranging from 0% to 27% worldwide. Factors such as geographic location, access and availability to ART, duration since inception of treatment programs, quality of care, risk-taking behaviors, mode of transmission, and viral subtype all dictate the prevalence in a particular geographical region. Although HIV-1 subtype may not be a good predictor of treatment outcome, review of emerging evidence supports the fact that HIV-1 genome sequence-resulting from natural polymorphisms or drug-associated mutations-matters when it comes to treatment outcomes. Therefore, continued surveillance of drug resistant variants in both treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced populations is needed to reduce the transmission of DRMs and to optimize the efficacy of the current ART armamentarium.
    Viruses 10/2014; 6(10):3855-3872. DOI:10.3390/v6103855 · 3.28 Impact Factor