Effect of indomethacin on E-cadherin and beta-catenin expression in HT-29 colon cancer cells.

Division of Molecular Medicine, Ruder Bosković Institute, Bijenicka c. 54, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Experimental and Molecular Pathology (Impact Factor: 2.13). 03/2006; 80(1):91-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2005.04.008
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) lower the incidence of and mortality from colon cancer. Although there is much evidence from epidemiological and laboratory studies that NSAIDs have antitumor activity and reduce the incidence of colon cancer, the mechanism of action remains unknown. In this paper, we present the effect of indomethacin on growth inhibition, induction of apoptosis, and alterations in the expression of several genes involved in Wnt signaling in HT-29 colon cancer cells. We have shown that indomethacin reduces the proliferation rate of HT-29 colon cancer cells and induces apoptosis. Concentrations of indomethacin from 10(-4) to 10(-3) M strongly inhibited the growth of HT-29 cells. The inhibition of growth, as well as induction of apoptosis was dose and time dependent. The treatment of cells with 4 x 10(-4) M indomethacin caused strong inhibition of cell growth (about 70%), enhanced expression of APC, decreased expression of beta-catenin and induced expression of E-cadherin proteins. Expression of beta-catenin was not markedly reduced instead, beta-catenin was translocated from the nucleus and cytoplasm to the plasma membrane. These results were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR analysis on mRNA level. At a concentration of 4 x 10(-4) M indomethacin there was increased expression of APC gene (10.9-fold induction; DeltaDeltaCt = 3.43) and E-cadherin gene (3.5-fold induction; DeltaDeltaCt = 1.79). These results suggest the antiproliferative effect of indomethacin may contribute to enhanced cell adhesion through increased expression of E-cadherin and translocation of beta-catenin from the nucleus to the cell membrane.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of incorporating pH-responsive polymers Eudragit (L100 or S100) in matrix bases composed of hydrophilic polymers polycarbophil and carbopol to design oral controlled release formulations with sigmoidal release profile for colon-specific delivery. Matrix tablets were prepared by wet granulation technique using indomethacin as model drug and were characterized for physical parameters, in vitro drug release, release kinetics, and stability on storage. The gastrointestinal (GI) transit of selected formulations was also investigated in human subjects using gamma scintigraphy. In vitro release studies indicated that the presence of pH-sensitive polymers in hydrophilic polymer base retarded the initial release significantly (10-15% release in 6 h) followed with controlled release for the next 8-10 h in simulated GI fluid pH (without enzymes). The presence of Eudragit in hydrophilic matrix base retarded the swelling of the matrix base in acidic to weakly acidic pH, but in alkaline pH, enhancement in drug release rate was observed due to the dissolution of Eudragit from the base resulting in a porous matrix structure, resulting in around 80-90% release in 14 h of study. In vivo gamma scintigraphy studies in healthy human subjects proved that the formulations had acceptable matrix strength to withstand gastric and colonic transit. The mean colonic residence time of selected designed formulations varied between 15 and 19 h. Such a matrix design could have potential application as colon-specific drug delivery systems with pH- and time-dependent drug release profile.
    Journal of Drug Targeting 01/2009; 16(10):741-57. · 2.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The primary objective of the study was to develop a pH and transit time controlled sigmoidal release polymeric matrix for colon-specific delivery of indomethacin. Tablet matrices were prepared using a combination of hydrophilic polymers (polycarbophil or carbopol) having pH-sensitive swelling properties with hydrophobic polymer ethyl cellulose. The prepared matrices were characterized for physical properties and in vitro release kinetics. The presence of ethyl cellulose in a hydrophilic polymer matrix resulted in a sigmoidal in vitro drug release pattern with negligible-to-very low drug release in the initial phase (0-6 h) followed by controlled release for 14-16 h. The retardation in initial release can be attributed to the presence of ethyl cellulose that reduced swelling of hydrophilic polymer(s), while in the later portion, polymer relaxation at alkaline pH due to the ionization of acrylic acid units on carbopol and polycarbophil resulted in enhanced drug release. Thus, a sigmoidal release pattern was obtained that could be ideal for colonic delivery of indomethacin in the potential treatment of colon cancer.
    Drug Delivery 09/2009; 16(6):295-303. · 2.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to design and develop microspheres of indomethacin with pH and transit time dependent release properties for achieving targeted delivery to the colon. Microspheres containing varying proportions of ethyl cellulose and Eudragit (L100 or S100) either alone or in combination were prepared using an oil-in-oil emulsion-based solvent evaporation technique. System comprising of acetone (internal phase) and liquid paraffin (external phase) in the ratio of 1 : 1 and 1 : 9 yielded microspheres with good physical properties (spherical and discrete), high drug loading (70-80%) and entrapment efficiency (70-85%). The lag time in the initial release depended on the proportion of pH-sensitive polymer Eudragit, while the duration of indomethacin release from microspheres was found to be directly proportional to proportion of the total polymer. Thus, a pH- and time-modulated sigmoidal release pattern could be observed in optimized formulations with less than 10% drug release in 4-6 h followed by controlled release extending up to 14-16 h.
    Journal of Microencapsulation 10/2008; 26(5):420-31. · 1.57 Impact Factor