Article

The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) influencing the UK national agenda on care of the dying.

Marie Curie Palliative Care Institute, Liverpool L25 8QA, UK.
International journal of palliative nursing 04/2005; 11(3):132-4. DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2005.11.3.18032
Source: PubMed
4 Followers
 · 
127 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The authors of a European Parliament report on palliative care summarise the process of the five-month investigation, as well as the real and potential results of the study. Engaging a large number of national and international stakeholders, including ministries of health, national palliative care associations and the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC), we were able to draw on a well of previous research and diverse experiences before formulating operative policy options for the EU and its Member States. While the report itself fomented some self-examination in the countries studied, its full exploitation by palliative care advocates is still pending.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Palliative care seeks to improve quality of life for patients with terminal, chronic or life-long, illnesses. In the UK, most palliative care occurs in primary care, for example, through general practices. A recent national UK survey of palliative care within general practices concluded that practices that utilized recognized initiatives to promote palliative care demonstrated better clinical care and higher perceived quality of palliative care. This paper reports on secondary analyses from that survey to investigate the management of information related to palliative care within practices. Relatively high levels of information provision to families and carers were reported, over two-thirds of practices reported having unified records for palliative care patients and over 90% of practices reported having a cancer/palliative care register that was fully or mostly operational. Larger practices, those using the Gold Standards Framework and practices using unified record keeping for palliative care, were independently more likely to give information to families and carers and were more likely to have a mostly or fully operational palliative care register. When testing for the relationship between measures of the structures and processes of information management and the perceived quality of care, as an outcome, within the practices, practices with a fully operational palliative care register and practices that had higher scores on the record-keeping scale were more likely to rate the quality of their palliative care as very good.
    Journal of Information Science 02/2013; 39(1):126-140. DOI:10.1177/0165551512470045 · 1.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Context Spiritual distress, including meaninglessness and hopelessness, is common in advanced disease. Spiritual care is a core component of palliative care, yet often neglected by health care professionals owing to the dearth of robust evidence to guide practice. Objectives To determine research priorities of clinicians/researchers and thus inform future research in spiritual care in palliative care. Methods An online, cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey was conducted. Respondents were asked whether there is a need for more research in spiritual care, and if so, to select the five most important research priorities from a list of 15 topics. Free-text questions were asked about additional research priorities and respondents' single most important research question, with data analyzed thematically. Results In total, 971 responses, including 293 from palliative care physicians, 112 from nurses, and 111 from chaplains, were received from 87 countries. Mean age was 48.5 years (standard deviation, 10.7), 64% were women, and 65% were Christian. Fifty-three percent reported their work as “mainly clinical,” and less than 2.5% stated that no further research was needed. Integrating quantitative and qualitative data demonstrated three priority areas for research: 1) development and evaluation of conversation models and overcoming barriers to spiritual care in staff attitudes, 2) screening and assessment, and 3) development and evaluation of spiritual care interventions and determining the effectiveness of spiritual care. Conclusion In this first international survey exploring researchers' and clinicians' research priorities in spiritual care, we found international support for research in this domain. Findings provide an evidence base to direct future research and highlight the particular need for methodologically rigorous evaluation studies.
    Journal of pain and symptom management 10/2014; 48(4). DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.10.020 · 2.74 Impact Factor