Article
Bioluminescent imaging of melanoma in live mice.
Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Journal of Investigative Dermatology (impact factor:
6.31).
08/2005;
125(1):159-65.
DOI:10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23759.x
pp.159-65
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: Luciferase expression and bioluminescence does not affect tumor cell growth in vitro or in vivo.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Live animal imaging is becoming an increasingly common technique for accurate and quantitative assessment of tumor burden over time. Bioluminescence imaging systems rely on a bioluminescent signal from tumor cells, typically generated from expression of the firefly luciferase gene. However, previous reports have suggested that either a high level of luciferase or the resultant light reaction produced upon addition of D-luciferin substrate can have a negative influence on tumor cell growth. To address this issue, we designed an expression vector that allows simultaneous fluorescence and luminescence imaging. Using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), we generated clonal cell populations from a human breast cancer (MCF-7) and a mouse melanoma (B16-F10) cell line that stably expressed different levels of luciferase. We then compared the growth capabilities of these clones in vitro by MTT proliferation assay and in vivo by bioluminescence imaging of tumor growth in live mice. Surprisingly, we found that neither the amount of luciferase nor biophotonic activity was sufficient to inhibit tumor cell growth, in vitro or in vivo. These results suggest that luciferase toxicity is not a necessary consideration when designing bioluminescence experiments, and therefore our approach can be used to rapidly generate high levels of luciferase expression for sensitive imaging experiments.Molecular Cancer 01/2010; 9:299. · 3.99 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
B16 mouse melanoma
caliper measurement
conventional chemotherapeutic agents
Current animal models
homograft model
human A375 melanoma model
intracranial tumors
intravenous B16 melanoma challenge
Listeria monocytogenes vaccine
lung nodules
Melanoma
melanoma antigen tyrosinase-related protein-2
novel therapeutic approaches
potential melanoma therapies
preclinical studies
previous models
reproducible bioluminescent B16 melanoma model
subcutaneous tumors
varying metastatic potential
vivo melanoma monitoring