Article

Action comprehension: deriving spatial and functional relations.

Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, Munich, Germany.
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (Impact Factor: 3.11). 07/2005; 31(3):465-79. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.465
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A perceived action can be understood only when information about the action carried out and the objects used are taken into account. It was investigated how spatial and functional information contributes to establishing these relations. Participants observed static frames showing a hand wielding an instrument and a potential target object of the action. The 2 elements could either match or mismatch, spatially or functionally. Participants were required to judge only 1 of the 2 relations while ignoring the other. Both irrelevant spatial and functional mismatches affected judgments of the relevant relation. Moreover, the functional relation provided a context for the judgment of the spatial relation but not vice versa. The results are discussed in respect to recent accounts of action understanding.

Full-text

Available from: Patric Bach, Jun 11, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
111 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The correct outcome of transitive actions depends on an object’s use, considering both the instrumental and functional features. Indeed, the representation of transitive action includes the correct/incorrect instrumental use and the congruous/incongruous functional use of the object. Objectives. The contribution of frontal (experiment 1) and posterior parietal (experiment 2) areas to process semantic violations in instrumental vs. functional action representation was explored. Methods These cortical areas were appositely modulated by anodal tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation) or sham tDCS when 43 healthy subjects processed semantic violations (congruous/incongruous pairs) and they had to perform an error detection task (measuring ERs – error rates; and RTs – response times). Results Decreased RTs were observed for incongruous pairs in the case of prefrontal stimulation compared to the sham condition. This effect was related to both the instrumental and functional conditions, suggesting that the activation of the prefrontal area may increase the ability to analyze the semantic incongruence independently from the anomaly type, which would limit the cognitive costs. In contrast, posterior parietal stimulation reduced RTs only in response to functional action in the case of semantic incongruence. Conclusions Thus, different cortical contributions by anterior vs. posterior areas occurred in response to semantic incongruences respectively for generic expectancy violations (more frontally distributed) and specific functional violations (more parietally distributed).
    Brain Stimulation 05/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.brs.2014.01.011 · 5.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous research investigated the contributions of target objects, situational context and movement kinematics to action prediction separately. The current study addresses how these three factors combine in the prediction of observed actions. Participants observed an actor whose movements were constrained by the situational context or not, and object-directed or not. After several steps, participants had to indicate how the action would continue. Experiment 1 shows that predictions were most accurate when the action was constrained and object-directed. Experiments 2A and 2B investigated whether these predictions relied more on the presence of a target object or cues in the actor's movement kinematics. The target object was artificially moved to another location or occluded. Results suggest a crucial role for kinematics. In sum, observers predict actions based on target objects and situational constraints, and they exploit subtle movement cues of the observed actor rather than the direct visual information about target objects and context.
    Psychological Research 03/2012; 76(4):434-45. DOI:10.1007/s00426-012-0423-2 · 2.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Following the theoretical notion that tools often extend one's body, in the present study, we investigated whether imitation of hand or tool actions is modulated by effector-specific information. Subjects performed grasping actions toward an object with either a handheld tool or their right hand. Actions were initiated in response to pictures representing a grip at an object that could be congruent or incongruent with the required action (grip-type congruency). Importantly, actions could be cued by means of a tool cue, a hand cue, and a symbolic cue (effector-type congruency). For both hand and tool actions, an action congruency effect was observed, reflected in faster reaction times if the observed grip type was congruent with the required movement. However, neither hand actions nor tool actions were differentially affected by the effector represented in the picture (i.e., when performing a tool action, the action congruency effect was similar for tool cues and hand cues). This finding suggests that imitation of hand and tool actions is effector-independent and thereby supports generalist rather than specialist theories of imitation.
    Experimental Brain Research 09/2011; 214(4):539-47. DOI:10.1007/s00221-011-2852-3 · 2.17 Impact Factor