Use of the Arndt wire-guided endobronchial blocker via nasal for one-lung ventilation in patient with anticipated restricted mouth opening for esophagectomy.
ABSTRACT Functional separation of the lungs may be accomplished by several methods. Patient with restricted mouth opening has limited options for one-lung ventilation. We report the use of wire-guided endobronchial blockade, a new tool for achieving one-lung ventilation in a patient with restricted mouth opening requiring nasotracheal, fiberoptic intubation for esophagectomy and reconstruction with gastric tube substitution.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: One-lung ventilation for a thoracotomy procedure was achieved with the help of a endobronchial blocker in a young girl with limited mouth opening, minimal neck extension, and a distorted tracheo-bronchial anatomy. As the patient would not cooperate for an awake nasotracheal intubation despite adequate preperation, an inhalational anesthetic was used to make the patient unconscious, taking care that spontaneous breathing was maintained. Nasotracheal intubation was done with the help of a fiberoptic bronchoscope. A wire-guided Arndt endobronchial blocker was placed coaxially through the endotracheal tube using a fiberoptic bronchoscope. This case report highlights that in a scenario of both upper and lower airway distortion, a bronchial blocker positioned through a nasotracheal tube under fiberoptic guidance might be the best option when one-lung ventilation is required.Indian journal of anaesthesia 11/2012; 56(6):567-9.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: One-lung ventilation (OLV) is necessary for selected surgical settings and medical conditions. Different methods have been described and used to isolate 1 lung, including the double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) and a variety of bronchial blockers (BBs). This selection is often based on the preferences and experiences of the anesthesiologist and surgeon. Complications associated with OLV isolation tubes have been previously described, but complications specifically associated with the Cohen BB (CBB) (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) have not been investigated. The purpose of this retrospective review was to determine the incidence of vocal cord injury, tracheobronchial injury, and hoarseness in adult patients who underwent OLV with the CBB. We reviewed electronic anesthesia records, operative dictation, and inpatient progress notes to collect information about vocal cord injury, bronchial injury, hoarseness, and sore throat for adults who underwent surgical and diagnostic procedures requiring OLV. Secondary endpoints were types of surgical procedures, degree of difficulty with orotracheal intubation, ability of the patient to tolerate extubation in the operating room, and whether the thoracic surgeon deemed the lung separation adequate. P<0.05 was considered significant. Of 130 patients, 113 underwent OLV with a CBB, and 17 patients underwent OLV with a DLT. The thoracic surgeon deemed the lung isolation adequate in all cases. Airway injury occurred in 2 patients with a CBB and none with a DLT (P=0.86). Both airway injuries were attributed to surgical technique. Two cases of postoperative hoarseness occurred in the CBB group (P=0.86). One injury was attributed to vagus nerve transection, and the other injury was diagnosed as vocal cord paralysis of unknown etiology. In 1 case, orotracheal intubation with a DLT was unsuccessful because of intubation difficulty and required conversion to a regular endotracheal tube and CBB for successful lung isolation. This study demonstrates that the use of CBB can be successful in a wide variety of thoracic operations, has minimal complications, eliminates the need for tracheal tube exchange when postoperative mechanical ventilation is required, and effectively isolates the lungs of critically ill patients.Ochsner Journal 01/2013; 13(3):389-93.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: We report a case of deliberate self-harm in which three three-inch nails were fired from a nail gun resulting in mandibular fixation and two penetrating injuries to the right cardiac ventricle. This combination of high-velocity penetrating injury has not been previously described. CASE PRESENTATION: A 69-year-old Caucasian man with a medical history of chronic depression was brought to hospital after a failed suicide attempt. The attempt consisted of self-asphyxiation with car exhaust fumes and shooting himself thrice with a three-inch nail gun. He sustained a penetrating nail injury to the floor of his mouth, effectively pinning his mouth closed, and penetrating injuries to the right ventricular free wall and at the junction of the right atrioventricular septum. The patient required emergency surgery with requirements for thoracotomy and sternotomy, lung isolation and cardiopulmonary bypass. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported case of a combination high-velocity penetrating nail gun injury to the face and the right cardiac ventricle. This rare case offers airway strategies to accommodate the surgical requirement for lung separation for penetrating chest trauma in a patient with iatrogenically limited mouth opening.Journal of Medical Case Reports 05/2013; 7(1):137.
Use of the Arndt wire-guided endobronchial blocker via nasal
for one-lung ventilation in patient with anticipated restricted
mouth opening for esophagectomy
Chee-Yueh Angie Ho*, Chun-Yu Chen, Min-Wen Yang, Hung-Ping Liu
Department of Anesthesia, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5, Fu-shin Street, Kweishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan, ROC
Received 19 October 2004; received in revised form 10 March 2005; accepted 11 March 2005; Available online 18 April 2005
Functional separation of the lungs may be accomplished by several methods. Patient with restricted mouth opening has limited options for
one-lung ventilation. We report the use of wire-guided endobronchial blockade, a new tool for achieving one-lung ventilation in a patient with
restricted mouth opening requiring nasotracheal, fiberoptic intubation for esophagectomy and reconstruction with gastric tube substitution.
Q 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Wire-guided endobronchial blockade; Restricted mouth opening; One-lung ventilation
One-lung ventilation is a commonly used technique to
facilitate surgical visualization during thoracic surgical
procedures. In some circumstances, lung isolation is
mandatory; it may be difficult to achieve in restricted
mouth opening or critically ill patients. These anticipated
difficult endotracheal intubation complicated one-lung
ventilation. We report the successful one-lung ventilation
in restricted mouth opening patient by using the new
2. Case report
A 65-year-old man was scheduled for esophagectomy and
reconstruction with gastric tube substitution because of
esophageal cancer. Four years ago, he suffered from left
buccal cancer and received radical neck dissection, free flap
reconstruction following marginal mandibulectomy. Post-
operative radiotherapy was completed. After radiotherapy,
trismus was noted with limited neck movement and mouth
opening of only 0.5 cm. All preoperative laboratory values,
In the operating room, routine monitors and a radial
arterial catheter were placed. Anesthesia and relaxation
were induced with fentanyl 150 mg, propofol 100 mg
and rocuronium 40 mg. A flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope
was (FOB) used as a guide to pass a conventional endo-
tracheal tube (inner diameter, 7.0 mm) through the right
nostril into the tracheal. An Arndt wire-guided endobron-
chial blocker (WEB) (Arndt Endobronchial-Blocker Set, Cook,
Inc., Bloomington, IN) was placed coaxially through the nasal
endotracheal tube using a pediatric bronchoscope and a
special bronchoscopy port. The special bronchoscopy port
offers multiple access ports. The proximal end of the
endotracheal tube was attached to a multiport adapter
that allow simultaneous introduction of the bronchoscope
and the endobronchial blocker while maintaining ventilation
of the lungs. The endobronchial port (WEB blocker port),
which is oriented at 308 to the bronchoscopy port, has a
Tuohy–Borst type valve that locks the blocker in place and
maintain an airtight seal. Prior to placement WEB, the
elliptical balloon of the blocker must be deflated. By using
fiberoptic guidance, the blocker was advanced until it could
be seen below single-lumen tube, and then twirled the
fingertips until the distal tip entered the right main
bronchus. The elliptical balloon of the blocker was inflated
under direct visualization and the FOB withdrawal. Lung
separation was accomplished without difficulty with
inflation of the blocker balloon. A right thoracotomy was
performed. The airway pressure under one-lung ventilation
was up to 31 cmH2O, and no desaturation was noted through
the whole procedure. The surgical procedure proceeded
uneventfully with good visualization of the operative field.
After completion of surgery, the blocker balloon was
European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 28 (2005) 174–175
1010-7940/$ - see front matter Q 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
*Corresponding author. Tel.: C886 3 328 1200 2389; fax: C886 3 328 1200
E-mail address: email@example.com (C.-Y. Angie Ho).
deflated and the WEB was removed. Right lung was
reexpanded and the trachea was extubated after obtaining
sufficient spontaneous ventilation.
Selective ventilation of one-lung ventilation has been
accomplished by several methods [1,2]. Tracheal intubation
of patients with restricted mouth opening may be difficult
and challenging because the maximum mouth opening
cannot be increased, even by administering neuromuscular
blocking drugs . Fiberoptic intubation remains a rec-
ommended technique for airway management . Nasal
intubation may be advantageous for this purpose and easier
to place, especially in patients with difficult airway [4,5].
This patient’s restricted mouth opening has limited option
for one-lung ventilation. The larger outer diameter and
distal curvature of the double-lumen tube would have made
nasal intubation difficult, if not impossible. Nasotracheal
intubation and one-lung ventilation using a Univent tube has
been previously reported . However, Univent placement
may be traumatic because of the larger outer diameter of
these tubes . The short length of a conventional single-
lumen tube also prohibits endobronchial intubation via nasal
route. The Fogarty occlusion embolectomy catheter as a
bronchial blockade to achieve lung isolation has been
described , but it also has several disadvantages .
Placement may be difficult, as it is lack of guide-wire device,
lack of communication channel in the center, therefore
suction or oxygen insufflation is not possible. An air leak from
the breathing circuit can be a common problem, especially
when the Fogarty tube is placed inside single-lumen
We describe a patient with anticipated anatomical
constraint of mouth opening, which disallowed the passage
of the double-lumen tube or Univent. The Arndt WEB and the
special bronchoscopy port have been proved to overcome
many of the pitfalls of current endobronchial blocker
technology. Selective WEB through a conventional endo-
tracheal tube has been described in many literatures as a
new alternative method to achieve one-lung ventilation in
morbidly obese or critically ill patient [9,10]. Advantage of
the Arndt device is the airway adaptor that contains ports for
anesthesia circuit, the bronchoscope, the bronchial blocker
as well as attachment to the endotracheal tube. Ventilation
is easily maintained during placement of the blocker.
Removal of the wire following placement provides a central
channel that allow some degree of suctioning through the
channel to deflate the operative lung and improve surgical
visualization. The bronchial blocker port has a self-sealing
diaphragm that can be tightened down around the bronchial
blocker to hold it in place, thereby preventing movement of
the blocker and its potential dislodgement from the desired
site. Because the Arndt blocker requires a single-lumen
endotracheal tube, it maximizes the cross-sectional diam-
eter, and eliminates the need for tube exchange if
mechanical ventilation is contemplated in the postoperative
The Arndt wire-guided endobronchial blocker system
offers a new tool to achieve one-lung ventilation in adults.
It offers the clinician alternative for managing one-lung
ventilation in a challenging patient who required nasal
intubation because of severe restricted mouth opening.
 Benumof JL, Partridge BL, Salvatierra C, Keating J. Margin of safety in
positioning modern double-lumen endotracheal tubes. Anesthesiology
 MacGillivray RG. Evaluation of a new tracheal tube with a movable
bronchus blocker. Anesthesia 1988;43:687–9.
 Aiello G, Metcalf I. Anesthetic implications of temporomandibuloar joint
disease. Can J Anaesth 1992;39:610–6.
 Benumof JL. Management of the difficult adult airway. With special
emphasis on awake tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1991;75:
 Gozal Y, Lee W. Nasal intubation and one-lung ventilation [Letter].
 Benumof JL. Separation of the two lungs (double-lumen tubes, bronchial
blockers, and endobronchial single-lumen tubes). In: Benumof JL,
editor. Airway management: principles and practice. St Louis, MO:
Mosby Yearbook; 1996. p. 412–43.
 Ginsberg RJ. New technique for one-lung anesthesia using endobronchial
blocker. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981;42:542–6.
 Larson CE. A device for endobronchial blocker placement during one-
lung anesthesia [Letter]. Anesth Analg 1990;71:311–2.
 Arndt GA, Kranner PW, Rusy DA, Love R. Single-lung ventilation in a
critically ill patient using a fiberoptically directed wire-guided endo-
bronchial blocker. Anesthesiology 1999;90:1484–6.
 Arndt GA, Delessio ST, Kranner PW, Orzepowski W, Ceranski B,
Valtysson B. One-lung ventilation when intubation is difficult—presen-
tation of a new endobronchial blocker. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999;43:
C.-Y. Angie Ho et al. / European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 28 (2005) 174–175 175