Article

Relationship between reduced forced expiratory volume in one second and the risk of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Department of Medicine(Respiratory Division), University of Bristish Columbia and The James Hogg iCAPTURE Center for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research, St Paul's Hospital, Room #368A, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6Z 1Y6.
Thorax (Impact Factor: 8.56). 07/2005; 60(7):570-5. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2004.037135
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Individuals with severely impaired lung function have an increased risk of lung cancer. Whether milder reductions in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) also increase the risk of lung cancer is controversial. Moreover, there is little consensus on whether men and women have similar risks for lung cancer for similar decreases in FEV(1).
A search was conducted of PubMed and EMBASE from January 1966 to January 2005 and studies that examined the relationship between FEV1 and lung cancer were identified. The search was limited to studies that were population based, employed a prospective design, were large in size (> or = 5000 participants), and adjusted for cigarette smoking status.
Twenty eight abstracts were identified, six of which did not report FEV1 and eight did not adjust for smoking. Included in this report are four studies that reported FEV1 in quintiles. The risk of lung cancer increased with decreasing FEV1. Compared with the highest quintile of FEV1 (> 100% of predicted), the lowest quintile of FEV1 (< approximately 70% of predicted) was associated with a 2.23 fold (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73 to 2.86) increase in the risk for lung cancer in men and a 3.97 fold increase in women (95% CI 1.93 to 8.25). Even relatively small decrements in FEV1 ( approximately 90% of predicted) increased the risk for lung cancer by 30% in men (95% CI 1.05 to 1.62) and 2.64 fold in women (95% CI 1.30 to 5.31).
Reduced FEV1 is strongly associated with lung cancer. Even a relatively modest reduction in FEV1 is a significant predictor of lung cancer, especially among women.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Wen Qi Gan, Dec 13, 2013
0 Followers
 · 
74 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Early detection of lung cancer implicitly suggests that early interventional strategy improves the outcome of lung cancer patients. It should be realised that the entire chain of interventions, early detection, accurate staging, local treatment and close surveillance, should be practically feasible in the cohort at risk in our ageing population [1]. This requires a comprehensive understanding for the optimal exploitation of the non-and minimally invasive technologies currently available in clinical practice. Catheter-based optical technologies, such as bronchoscopic techniques, are, by virtue of thier minimal invasiveness, extremely valuable for individuals at highest risk who frequently suffering from severe comorbidities, limiting the application of more conventional measures. Therefore, individuals at risk are candidates for early intervention using bronchoscopic techniques; this has an important advantage [2], as many patients may be regarded surgically inoperable. Current videobronchoscopes have limited access beyond the segmental branches of the tracheobronchial tree due to size issues. Development of single optics and ultrathin applicators will definitely broaden bronchoscopic use towards the more peripheral field of the lung parenchyma [3]. Optical advancements beyond the spectrum of visible light, improvements in noninvasive dynamic imaging and four-dimensional navigational assistance can provide new avenues towards encompassing dynamic monitoring and early intervention of thoracic diseases in vivo [4, 5]. In the present chapter, we will focus on early detection by bronchoscopy and briefly describe the concept behind it, which when combined with other techniques may generate a coherent cost-effective strategy for early intervention. Ensuing chapters by experts in the field will deal with various issues for complementary use of alternative bronchoscopic techniques, which warrant a more practical application in the daily clinical practice.
  • Source
  • Source