Evaluation of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with resuscitative drugs: a prospective comparative study in Japan

Department of Anesthesiology, Keio University, Edo, Tōkyō, Japan
Resuscitation (Impact Factor: 3.96). 08/2005; 66(1):53-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.10.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study aimed at evaluating two emergency medical service systems, one in which emergency life-saving technicians (ELSTs) are allowed to administer epinephrine (adrenaline) to patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and one in which ELSTs are allowed to administer epinephrine, lidocaine, and atropine.
A modified, prospective community health trial was conducted from April 1 to October 31, 2003. Areas served by physician-manned ambulances, where out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed with resuscitative drugs (experimental areas), were compared to areas served by ELST-manned ambulances, where resuscitative drugs were not administered outside the hospital (reference areas). The sequence of emergency procedures performed in the experimental areas was divided into three phases. Phase I included administration of epinephrine, which simulated administration of epinephrine by ELSTs. Phase II started with the use of lidocaine or atropine. Phases I and II simulated administration of epinephrine, lidocaine, and atropine by ELSTs. Phase III began with administration of another drug. Outcomes, resuscitation rates and 1-month survival rates were determined, and differences between the two types of areas were analyzed.
For non-traumatic cardiac arrest, outcomes through phase II in the experimental areas were significantly better than those in the reference areas. Phase I-only outcomes in the experimental areas were better, but not significantly better, than those in the reference areas.
Use of resuscitative drugs for non-traumatic prehospital CPR appears to be effective in terms of resuscitation rates and 1-month survival rates.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Novel formulas are presented for ARMA estimation errors of a second order stochastic process. The formulas are recursive and can be used as estimates of the convergence of the process.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Emergency medical service (EMS) systems in Europe have developed differently due to legal, educational and organisational aspects. The aim of the present study was to compare cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) outcomes and characteristics in three differently organised and staffed EMS systems in close vicinity. We analysed the charts of patients treated in the EMS systems of the cities of Aachen (Germany), Heerlen (The Netherlands) and Eupen (Belgium), retrospectively. Main outcome measures were the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), hospital discharge and cerebral performance after 1 year. Furthermore, factors influencing neurological outcome and the incidence of cross-border emergency assistance were assessed. Of 852 patients found unresponsive with no palpable pulse and/or the absence of breathing, CPR was performed in 322 patients. The overall rate of ROSC was 44.1 and 13.7% of patients were discharged alive. A good neurological outcome was observed in 95.5% of survivors. The rate of ventricular fibrillation was significantly higher (46.9% versus 21.9 and 21.2%, p < 0.05) and the total amount of epinephrine given during CPR significantly lower (4.5+/-5.2 mg versus 9.8+/-10.8 and 8.4+/-6.2 mg, p < 0.05) in the Dutch system. No significant differences in outcome variables were observed between the systems. Neurological outcome was favourable when the arrest was witnessed, occurred in a public place, the initial rhythm was shockable, a low total amount of adrenaline (epinephrine) was given and the call-response interval was short. In 1.2% of the cases cross-border emergency care was provided. Despite medical and organisational discrepancies, outcomes of CPR in three neighbouring EMS systems are comparable. Neurological outcome is influenced by demographical, organisational and medical factors. Cross-border emergency assistance for CPR is almost undetectable and needs improvement.
    Resuscitation 01/2007; 72(1):66-73. DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.06.001 · 3.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Unnecessary ambulance use has become a socioeconomic problem in Japan. We investigated the possible relations between socioeconomic factors and medically unnecessary ambulance calls, and we estimated the incremental demand for unnecessary ambulance use produced by socioeconomic factors. We conducted a self-administered questionnaire-based survey targeting residents of Yokohama, Japan. The questionnaire included questions pertaining to socioeconomic characteristics, dichotomous choice method questions pertaining to ambulance calls in hypothetical nonemergency situations, and questions on the city's emergency medical system. The probit model was used to analyze the data. A total of 2,029 out of 3,363 targeted recipients completed the questionnaire (response rate, 60.3%). Probit regression analyses showed that several demographic and socioeconomic factors influence the decision to call an ambulance. Male respondents were more apt than female respondents to state that they would call an ambulance in nonemergency situations (p < 0.05). Age was an important factor influencing the hypothetical decision to call an ambulance (p < 0.05); elderly persons were more apt than younger persons to state that they would call an ambulance. Possession of a car and hesitation to use an ambulance negatively influenced the hypothetical decision to call an ambulance (p < 0.05). Persons who do not have a car were more likely than those with a car to state that they would call an ambulance in unnecessary situations. Results of the study suggest that several socioeconomic factors, i.e., age, gender, household income, and possession of a car, influence a person's decision to call an ambulance in nonemergency situations. Hesitation to use an ambulance and knowledge of the city's primary emergency medical center are likely to be important factors limiting ambulance overuse. It was estimated that unnecessary ambulance use is increased approximately 10% to 20% by socioeconomic factors.
    BMC Health Services Research 07/2007; 7(1):120. DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-7-120 · 1.66 Impact Factor
Show more