Article

Managing unnecessary variability in patient demand to reduce nursing stress and improve patient safety. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf

Boston University, Boston, USA.
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources 07/2005; 31(6):330-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Increases in adverse clinical outcomes have been documented when hospital nurse staffing is inadequate. Since most hospitals limit nurse staffing to levels for average rather than peak patient census, substantial census increases create serious potential stresses for both patients and nurses. By reducing unnecessary variability, hospitals can reduce many of these stresses and thereby improve patient safety and quality of care. THE SOURCE AND NATURE OF VARIABILITY IN DEMAND: The variability in the daily patient census is a combination of the natural (uncontrollable) variability contributed by the emergency department and the artificial (potentially controllable) peaks and valleys of patient flow into the hospital fromelective admissions. Once artificial variability in demand is significantly reduced, a substantial portion of the peaks and valleys in census disappears; the remaining censsus variability is largely patient and disease driven. When artificial variability has been minimized, a hospital must have sufficient resources for the remaining patient-driven peaks in demand, over which it has no control, if it is to deliver an optimal level of care. DISCUSSION: Study of operational issues in health care delivery, and acting on what is learned, is critical. Al forms of artificial variation in the demand and supply of health care services should be identified, and pilot programs to test operational changes should be conducted.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Michael L Mcmanus, Apr 20, 2015
4 Followers
 · 
326 Views
  • Source
    • "The issue of patient flow variability has also been extensively analyzed by other authors [9,34–39]. Particularly, Litvak makes a distinction between natural variability and artificial variability [10] [11] [36]: natural variability is uncontrollable and is due to the intrinsic characteristics of health care delivery (for example, patient flow from the ED), whereas artificial variability is potentially controllable through managerial intervention and is due to process defects or incorrect behaviors. According to Litvak [11], the key to improving patient flow management – and, consequently, accommodate growing demand – is to increase the bed occupancy by eliminating patient flow variability. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Through a comparative study of six Italian hospitals, the paper develops and tests a framework to analyze hospital-wide patient flow performance. The framework adopts a system-wide approach to patient flow management and is structured around three different levels: (1) the hospital, (2) the pipelines (possible patient journeys within the hospital) and (3) the production units (physical spaces, such as operating rooms, where service delivery takes places). The focus groups and the data analysis conducted within the study support that the model is a useful tool to investigate hospital-wide implications of patient flows. The paper provides also evidence about the causes of hospital patient flow problems. Particularly, while shortage of capacity does not seem to be a relevant driver, our data shows that patient flow variability caused by inadequate allocation of capacity does represent a key problem. Results also show that the lack of coordination between different pipelines and production units is critical. Finally, the problem of overlapping between elective and unscheduled cases can be solved by setting aside a certain level of capacity for unexpected peaks.
    Health Policy 01/2014; 115(2-3). DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.12.010 · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "However, this notion is only partially correct. As sustained by different authors (Vissers 1998, Haraden and Resar 2004, Litvak et al. 2005, Walley and Steyn 2006), a relevant portion of this variability is artificial and can be eliminated through organisational strategies such as better scheduling and capacity management systems or the introduction of standardised clinical pathways for homogenous sub-groups of patients. Reductions in variability and higher levels of process standardisation should allow relevant improvements to be made to the overall healthcare supply chain. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Innovations in supply chain (SC) management are rapidly spreading in public healthcare sectors across developed countries. In particular, healthcare managers and policymakers view SC innovation as a way to lower costs and improve quality. However, although the related rhetoric is strong, the literature provides little evidence of the benefits and performance of such SC initiatives. Above all, the literature lacks a sound conceptual framework for appraising SC management in public healthcare organisations. We argue that the public nature of healthcare and the specificities of the healthcare context require a specific theoretical approach to identifying the appropriate dimensions of SC initiatives to evaluate. Drawing from an extensive literature review and a longitudinal analysis of an inductive case study – a public hospital network developed in Tuscany (ESTAV), Italy – this work proposes a framework for assessing supply chain performance in the public healthcare sector. In addition, an empirical analysis was conducted to test the soundness and robustness of the framework, and this article presents conclusions regarding its applicability and managerial implications.
    Production Planning and Control 01/2012; DOI:10.1080/09537287.2012.666906 · 0.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The basic concepts of arrival and service variability are frequently applied to health services. Litvak et al. (2005) reduced the variability in the demand for nursing staff by smoothing the elective admissions. Lynk (1995) described that merged hospitals would likely face lower variability in demand relative to the mean, while Baker et al. (2004) explored the relationship between demand variability and hospital costs. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper is motivated by a case study to reduce the throughput times for radiotherapy treatment. The goal is to find a cost-effective way to meet future throughput targets. A combination of queuing theory and computer simulation was used. First, computer simulation to detect the bottleneck(s) in a multi-step radiotherapy process. Despite, the investment in an additional linear accelerator, the main bottleneck turned out to be the outpatient department (OPD). Next, based on queuing theory, waiting times were improved by reducing the fluctuations in the OPD capacity. Computer simulation was used again to quantify the effect on the total throughput time of a radiotherapy patient. The results showed a reduction in both access times as well as waiting times prior to the consecutive steps: the preparation phase and actual treatment. The paper concludes with practical suggestions on how to reduce the fluctuations in capacity, and seems of interest for other radiotherapy departments or other multi-step situations in a hospital. KeywordsDiscrete event simulation–Queuing theory–Radiotherapy department–Variability–Waiting lists
    Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal 12/2011; 24(4):1-17. DOI:10.1007/s10696-011-9119-y · 1.44 Impact Factor
Show more