An update on safety-net hospitals: Coping with the late 1990s and early 2000s

Department of Health Administration, Virginia Commonwealth University, in Richmond, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.32). 07/2005; 24(4):1047-56. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.1047
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Recent forces have created new financial stress for hospitals but also some relief. This paper explores hospitals' changing involvement in the safety net between 1996 and 2002. We replicate approaches used in a study of 1990-1997 and thus provide a needed update on the U.S. hospital safety net. Overall, some groups of safety-net hospitals increased uncompensated care, but others did not. Non-safety-net hospitals trimmed certain services commonly used by the indigent; this may point to future reductions in access. We examine the implications of these findings for the future of the safety net.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract The purpose of this study was to identify differential improvement in alcohol use among injured patients following brief intervention. Latent class analysis was conducted to identify patient profiles based on alcohol-related risk from two clinical trials (Texas: N = 737; Maryland: N = 250) conducted in Level-1 trauma centers. Drinking was analyzed to detect improvements at six and 12 months. The four classes that emerged from Maryland participants were similar to four of the five classes from Texas. Increases in both studies for days abstinent were reported by classes characterized by multiple risks and minimal risks. Decreases in volume consumed for both studies were also reported by classes characterized by multiple risks and minimal risks. By classifying patients according to alcohol-related risk, providers may be able to build on positive prognoses for drinking improvements or adapt interventions to better serve those likely to improve less.
    Behavioral Medicine 08/2014; DOI:10.1080/08964289.2014.951305 · 1.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To examine the effect of the recession on the financial performance of safety-net versus non-safety-net hospitals.Data Sources/Study SettingAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality Hospital Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases, Medicare Cost Reports, American Hospital Association Annual Survey, InterStudy, and Area Health Resource File.Study DesignRetrospective, longitudinal panel of hospitals, 2007–2011. Safety-net hospitals were identified using percentage of patients who were Medicaid or uninsured. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate average effects of the recession on hospital operating and total margins, revenues and expenses in each year, 2008–2011, comparing safety-net with non-safety-net hospitals.Data Collection/Extraction Methods1,453 urban, nonfederal, general acute hospitals in 32 states with complete data.Principal FindingsSafety-net hospitals, as identified in 2007, had lower operating and total margins. The gap in operating margin between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals was sustained throughout the recession; however, total margin was more negatively affected for non-safety-net hospitals in 2008. Higher percentages of Medicaid and uninsured patients were associated with lower revenue in private hospitals in all years, and lower revenue and expenses in public hospitals in 2011.Conclusions Safety-net hospitals may not be disproportionately vulnerable to macro-economic fluctuations, but their significantly lower margins leave less financial cushion to weather sustained financial pressure.
    Health Services Research 09/2014; DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12230 · 2.49 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 21, 2014