Behavioral detection of spatial stimuli is reflected in auditory cortical dynamics.

Apperception and Cortical Dynamics, Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Neurology & Clinical Neurophysiology 02/2004; 2004:50.
Source: PubMed


We studied the cortical processing of spatial stimuli by magnetoencephalographic (MEG) measurements using broadband noise bursts presented from eight sound source directions in the horizontal plane. The stimuli were individually created for each subject by using three-dimensional (3D) sound techniques. The subjects carried out a behavioral task where their accuracy for localizing the 3D stimuli was established. We found that the auditory N100m response was sensitive to the sound source direction, exhibiting contralaterally more preponderant responses in both the left and the right hemisphere. Generally, responses were more prominent in the right hemisphere. The behavioral performance of the subjects correlated positively with N100m amplitude organization, showing that the dynamics of auditory cortex predict behavioral sound detection.

Download full-text


Available from: Patrick May, Jun 02, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent studies on spatial hearing showed that individual variability is greater with virtual sources than with real ones, but that sensorial feedback provides an efficacious and rapid learning procedure. This study evaluated the degree of inter-individual variability with real sound sources in the absence of feedback. Fifty normal-hearing listeners, aged 18-62, either left- or right handed, participated. The experiment was conducted in an anechoic room. One of twelve loudspeakers placed in the frontal horizontal plane and hidden by a curtain emitted a train of low-pass pulses. Listeners had to indicate the estimated direction of that source by placing a pointer on a screen. No feedback was given to them. Each listener completed 480-720 trials. Results indicated that variability between individual was great in both resolution in bias. Precisely, individuals differed (1) in the size of their maximum error, (2) in the azimuthal region in which this maximum error occurred, and (3) in the spatial symmetry of their performance. Indeed, 25% of the listeners showed significant left-right differences in their performance, these differences always favoring the left side of space. Such asymmetries have been noticed earlier but attributed to greater front-back confusions on the right, which cannot explain the present results.
    The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 06/2008; 123(5):3568. DOI:10.1121/1.2934632 · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The number of subjects in studies on human spatial hearing is generally small. Therefore, individual differences and the factors underlying variability are unknown. In this study, we investigated across-listener variability in auditory localization abilities in a group of 50 naïve adults with normal hearing. Targets were trains of low-frequency noise bursts presented to 1 of 12 hidden speakers in the azimuthal plane. We observed less across-listener variability in the variance of individual responses but more in the root-mean-square and signed errors, which tended to increase with target angle. One third of the listeners demonstrated systematically smaller signed errors with left-sided targets than with right-sided ones. These asymmetries were observed less frequently in left-handers and females than in right-handers and males. Performance was not correlated with age. About 4 of 6 listeners trained with sensory feedback showed no reduction of asymmetries with training but rather showed a reduction in errors on their "best" side. Across-listener variability in the asymmetry of brain organization, notably linked to handedness or gender, is discussed.
    Hearing research 07/2009; 255(1-2):142-54. DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2009.06.013 · 2.97 Impact Factor
Show more