An in vitro biomechanical study of a hinged external fixator applied to an unstable elbow.

Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (Impact Factor: 2.37). 07/2005; 14(4):429-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.012
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Details of the mechanical properties of hinged external fixators are essential to use the fixator properly in the clinical setting. A hinged external fixator (Dynamic Joint Distractor 2) was attached to the lateral side of 7 cadaveric elbows. Cantilever lateral bending tests were performed at 3 flexion angles in varus and valgus directions. Varied states of joint contact and axial loading were studied. Stiffness of the construct was calculated with uniaxial loading. Stiffness decreased with increased elbow flexion. Gap creation made the system less stiff. Axial loading made the system stiffer, especially in valgus testing. Stiffness in varus was approximately 4 times that in valgus. Lateral fixator application with half pins is most effective for protecting against varus-producing forces. When using the external fixator for unstable elbows, attention should be paid to the status of the articular surfaces and the integrity of the ligaments, and this should also be noted for elbow position during rehabilitation.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: The application of a hinged elbow external fixator is technically demanding because the hinge axis must coincide exactly with the flexion-extension axis of the elbow. The standard technique involves inserting a 3-mm K-wire freehand into the distal humerus to materialize the flexion-extension axis. We designed a guidewire device for extracorporeal hinge positioning without K-wire insertion. In a cadaver study, we compared freehand K-wire insertion and our extracorporeal technique. METHODS: In 12 cadaveric elbows, we induced acute elbow instability by sectioning the medial collateral ligament complex and the anterior and posterior capsule. A hinged external fixator was applied to each elbow using both techniques. The outcome measures were procedure duration, number of image-intensifier shots (as a measure of radiation exposure), and passive motion range after fixator implantation. RESULTS: Compared with the freehand K-wire technique, the extracorporeal technique provided greater range of motion and significantly lower values for procedure duration and number of image-intensifier shots. Data dispersion was less marked with the extracorporeal technique, indicating better reproducibility. CONCLUSION: The extracorporeal technique based on a guidewire device enabled non-invasive positioning of a hinged elbow external fixator. This technique was faster, less irradiating, and more reproducible than the freehand K-wire technique.
    Chirurgie de la Main 05/2013; · 0.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose of review: Recent advances in the treatment and classification of fractures of the proximal ulna will be reviewed, with an emphasis on injury patterns rather than on fracture locations. Recent findings: For the terrible triad injury, a protocol has been created that addresses all bony and soft tissue injuries, recognizing that the lateral collateral ligament complex rarely remains intact. The coronoid process is also repaired, and new data emphasize the role of the coronoid in varus stability. Recent work has also shown that the type of coronoid fracture can to a great extent be predicted by the mechanism of injury. Varus overload results in medial facet fractures, posterior dislocations result in coronoid tip fractures, and trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations result in large coronoid base fractures. Some attention has also been paid to defining the trans-olecranon fracture-dislocation as a distinct entity from Monteggia lesions. Results with trans-olecranon fractures have been poor despite aggressive surgical management, particularly with concomitant radial head or neck injuries. Summary: The recognition of specific injury patterns involving fractures of the proximal ulna has led to advances in the management and classification of these injuries.
    Current Opinion in Orthopaedics 07/2006; 17(4):355-363.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The treatment of elbow stiffness remains a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. A hinged external fixator with distraction ability has recently emerged as a new option in the surgical treatment of elbow stiffness. Between January 2007 and December 2009, twenty-five posttraumatic stiff elbows (mean patient age, 29.2 years) received distraction arthrolysis from 1 surgeon group (W.J.W., L.H., P.Z.J.) at the authors' institution. For patients with only periarticular soft tissue contracture (grade 1), close mechanical distraction was performed with the assistance of an external fixator under anesthesia; open arthrolysis was avoided as much as possible. For patients who also had heterotopic ossification (grade 2), it was removed through a limited approach before the external fixator was applied. For patients with osteoarticular surface damage or destruction (grade 3), osteoarticular integrity was restored before arthrolysis. Range of motion increased markedly, from 33.4° (range, 0°-75°) preoperatively to 105.6° (range, 80°-140°) immediately postoperatively (Student's t test, P<.05).Of the 25 patients, 23 were followed for a mean of 16 months. No serious complications occurred. Mean range of motion was 97.4° (range, 70°-130°) at final follow-up, a significant increase from preoperatively (Student's t test, P<.05). No significant loss of range of motion was found at final follow-up compared with intraoperative values (average 8.2° loss; Student's t test, P>.05). This study suggests that a hinged external distraction fixator is a less invasive option for treating posttraumatic elbow stiffness and prevents contracture recurrence after arthrolysis.
    Orthopedics 11/2012; 35(11):e1625-30. · 1.05 Impact Factor