Time since menopause does not affect plasma viscosity, plasma thromboxane levels and Doppler findings.
ABSTRACT To evaluate whether the use of transdermal hormone replacement therapy (HRT), in women within 5 years of menopause compared with women who were postmenopausal for > 5 years, would significantly influence thromboxane B2 levels, plasma viscosity and Doppler flow parameters at the level of the uterine, internal carotid, ophthalmic and bladder wall arteries.
Thirty-five normal-weight (body mass index > 19 and < 25 kg/m(2)) postmenopausal women (age 54.6 +/- 3.9 years, mean +/- standard deviation) participated in the study and were divided into two groups (Group I: n = 19, time since menopause < 5 years; and Group II: n = 16, time since menopause > 5 years). Patients were treated with a continuous estradiol transdermal supplementation and 12-day courses of medroxyprogesterone acetate every 2 months. They were studied at baseline and after 6 months (in the estrogen-only phase of the cycle).
Results showed a beneficial effect of hormone substitution after 6 months of therapy. Baseline plasma viscosity was similar in both groups, and decreased significantly after therapy in both Group I (-17.5%) and Group II (-15.6%). Plasma levels of thromboxane B(2) were similar at baseline and diminished equally in Group I and Group II (-85.6% and -85.2%, respectively) after treatment. Doppler assessment of the pulsatility index at the level of uterine, internal carotid, ophthalmic and bladder wall arteries showed no differences between groups at baseline and revealed a significant reduction of vascular impedance at the end of the treatment in both groups.
Time since menopause does not affect the potential hemodynamic benefits of HRT in normal-weight women.
- SourceAvailable from: Diederick Grobbee[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Whereas observational data for postmenopausal women using hormone therapy (HT) have shown a protective effect against cardiovascular disease, prospective, randomized trials have demonstrated a harmful effect on the vascular system. This study describes the effects of HT on lipids, hemostatic parameters, inflammation, and the vascular wall. Reasons for the different results of observational and experimental studies of HT are postulated. The timing of hormonal supplementation seems crucial. Used chronically, HT has no harmful effects; however, first-time use of HT after a recent cardiovascular event results in an early increase in adverse cardiovascular events. In most observational studies, women started HT for postmenopausal symptoms, whereas in experimental studies, women started HT 10 to 20 years or longer after menopause. Cumulative evidence supports the hypothesis that HT has more effect in maintaining vascular health than in alleviating endothelial dysfunction. HT has not proven beneficial in the long term in women at risk of a cardiovascular event. The interval between menopause and the start of HT plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of HT in the vascular system.Menopause 01/2004; 11(2):228-35. · 3.16 Impact Factor