The Prevalence and Correlates of Nonaffective Psychosis in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R)

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Biological Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 10.26). 11/2005; 58(8):668-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.034
Source: PubMed


To estimate the prevalence and correlates of clinician-diagnosed DSM-IV nonaffective psychosis (NAP) in a national household survey.
Data came from the United States National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). A screen for NAP was followed by blinded sub-sample clinical reappraisal interviews. Logistic regression was used to impute clinical diagnoses to respondents who were not re-interviewed. The method of Multiple Imputation (MI) was used to estimate prevalence and correlates.
Clinician-diagnosed NAP was well predicted by the screen (area under the curve [AUC] = .80). The MI prevalence estimate of NAP (standard error in parentheses) is 5.0 (2.6) per 1000 population lifetime and 3.0 (2.2) per 1000 past 12 months. The vast majority (79.4%) of lifetime and 12-month (63.7%) cases met criteria for other DSM-IV hierarchy-free disorders. Fifty-eight percent of 12-month cases were in treatment, most in the mental health specialty sector.
The screen for NAP in the NCS-R greatly improved on previous epidemiological surveys in reducing false positives, but coding of open-ended screening scale responses was still needed to achieve accurate prediction. The lower prevalence estimate than in total-population incidence studies raises concerns that systematic nonresponse bias causes downward bias in survey prevalence estimates of NAP.

Download full-text


Available from: Margaret Guyer, Jul 20, 2014
30 Reads
    • "Yet, the development of PTSD after a single traumatic experience seems to be the exception rather than the rule. While 50–60% of study participants reported at least one potential traumatic experience in western non-war countries, only 5–10% of them developed PTSD (Kessler, Sonnega, Bromet, Hughes, & Nelson, 1995; Kessler et al., 2005). Studies investigating PTSD in "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Survivors of war trauma or childhood maltreatment are at increased risk for trauma-spectrum disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In addition, traumatic stress has been associated with alterations in the neuroendocrine and the immune system, enhancing the risk for physical diseases. Traumatic experiences might even affect psychological as well as biological parameters in the next generation, i.e. traumatic stress might have transgenerational effects. This article outlines how epigenetic processes, which represent a pivotal biological mechanism for dynamic adaptation to environmental challenges, might contribute to the explanation of the long-lasting and transgenerational effects of trauma. In particular, epigenetic alterations in genes regulating the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis as well as the immune system have been observed in survivors of childhood and adult trauma. These changes could result in enduring alterations of the stress response as well as the physical health risk. Furthermore, the effects of parental trauma could be transmitted to the next generation by parental distress and the pre- and postnatal environment, as well as by epigenetic marks transmitted via the germline. While epigenetic research has a high potential of advancing our understanding of the consequences of trauma, the findings have to be interpreted with caution, as epigenetics only represent one piece of a complex puzzle of interacting biological and environmental factors. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Behavioral Sciences & the Law 09/2015; DOI:10.1002/bsl.2200 · 0.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Being a condition that occurs around the world and is prevalent in all races, the relationship between ethnicity and schizophrenia has been the subject of multiple studies in recent years (Kessler et al., 2005; Hampton, 2007; Chrishon et al., 2012 ). Despite the United States National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) study reporting the prevalence of schizophrenia among African Americans (AAs) and Hispanics being similar to that for Caucasian non-Hispanics (Kessler et al., 2005), various studies have documented how AAs and Hispanics are diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders more often than Caucasians (Hampton, 2007; Chrishon et al., 2012). Hampton found the increased rates for AAs being diagnosed with schizophrenia compared to Caucasians ranged from 9% to 32% (Hampton, 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A substantial research literature implicates potential racial/ethnic bias in the diagnosis of schizophrenia and in clinical ratings of psychosis. There is no similar information regarding bias effects on ratings of everyday functioning. Our aims were to determine if Caucasian raters vary in their ratings of the everyday functioning of schizophrenia patients of different ethnicities, to find out which factors determine accurate self-report of everyday functioning in different ethnic groups, and to know if depression has similar effects on the way people of different ethnicities self-report their current functionality. We analyzed data on 295 patients with schizophrenia who provided their self-report of their everyday functioning and also had a Caucasian clinician rating their functionality. Three racial/ethnic groups (African American (AA), Hispanic and Caucasian) were studied and analyzed on the basis of neurocognition, functional capacity, depression and real-world functional outcomes. No differences based on racial/ethnic status in clinician assessments of patients' functionality were found. Differences between racial groups were found in personal and maternal levels of education. Severity of depression was significantly correlated with accuracy of self-assessment of functioning in Caucasians, but not in AAs. Higher scores on neurocognition and functional capacity scales correlated with reduced overestimation of functioning in AAs, but not in Hispanics. This data might indicate that measurement of everyday functionality is less subject to rater bias than measurement of symptoms of schizophrenia. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
    07/2015; 138(1-2). DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.06.042
  • Source
    • "The prevalence of psychotic experiences in this weighted sample 9.1% (SE ¼0.9), with more individuals reporting hallucinations , % (SE) ¼ 8.6 (0.9), than delusions, % (SE) ¼1.6 (0.2), in concurrence with past studies using the NCS-R (e.g., Kessler et al., 2005). Psychotic experiences were associated with one predictor of interest, perceived relative age, as well as with sex, and income to poverty ratio, but not school mobility, in univariate analyses (Table 1). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: School-related difficulties have received relatively little attention as environmental risk factors for psychotic experiences (PEs), despite being characterized by marginalization and social defeat during critical periods of psychological development. This study examined both childhood age relative to one׳s classmates and school mobility as risk factors for adult psychotic experiences in the National Comorbidity Survey-Replication (NCS-R). Weighted logistic regression models were used to explore the hypotheses that lifetime psychotic experiences reported on the World Health Organization psychosis screen would be more prevalent among those younger than their classmates during childhood and for those with frequent school mobility. Younger perceived relative age (odds ratio (OR)=2.05, 95% confidence interval=1.43-2.95) was independently associated with psychotic experiences in the fully adjusted model, but school mobility was not. School-related risk factors for psychosis provide promising points for community-level intervention, and support the claim that environmental factors characterized by disadvantage and marginalization contribute to psychosis etiology. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Psychiatry Research 01/2015; 226(1). DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.01.017 · 2.47 Impact Factor
Show more