Article

Predicting mortality and healthcare utilization with a single question.

Section of General Internal Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Health Services Research (Impact Factor: 2.49). 08/2005; 40(4):1234-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00404.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We compared single- and multi-item measures of general self-rated health (GSRH) to predict mortality and clinical events a large population of veteran patients.
We analyzed prospective cohort data collected from 21,732 patients as part of the Veterans Affairs Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP), a randomized controlled trial investigating quality-of-care interventions.
We created an age-adjusted, logistic regression model for each predictor and outcome combination, and estimated the odds of events by response category of the GSRH question and compared the discriminative ability of the predictors by developing receiver operator characteristic curves and comparing the associated area under the curve (AUC)/c-statistic for the single- and multi-item measures.
All patients were sent a baseline assessment that included a multi-item measure of general health, the 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36), and an inventory of comorbid conditions. We compared the predictive and discriminative ability of the GSRH to the SF-36 physical component score (PCS), the mental component score (MCS), and the Seattle index of comorbidity (SIC). The GSRH is an item included in the SF-36, with the wording: "In general, would you say your health is: Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor?"
The GSRH, PCS, and SIC had comparable AUC for predicting mortality (AUC 0.74, 0.73, and 0.73, respectively); hospitalization (AUC 0.63, 0.64, and 0.60, respectively); and high outpatient use (AUC 0.61, 0.61, and 0.60, respectively). The MCS had statistically poorer discriminatory performance for mortality and hospitalization than any other other predictors (p<.001).
The GSRH response categories can be used to stratify patients with varying risks for adverse outcomes. Patients reporting "poor" health are at significantly greater odds of dying or requiring health care resources compared with their peers. The GSRH, collectable at the point of care, is comparable with longer instruments.

0 Followers
 · 
99 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine whether providing health insurance coverage to undocumented children affects the health of those children. The data come from a survey of 1235 parents of enrollees in the new insurance program ("Healthy Kids") in Santa Clara County, California. The survey was conducted from August 2003 to July 2004. Cross-sectional study using a group of children insured for one year as the study group (N=626) and a group of newly insured children as the comparison group (N=609). Regression analysis is used to adjust for differences in the groups according to a range of characteristics. Parents were interviewed by telephone in either English or Spanish (most responded in Spanish). The response rate was 89 percent. The study group-who were children continuously insured by Healthy Kids for one year-were significantly less likely to be in fair/poor health and to have functional impairments than the comparison group of newly insured children (15.9 percent versus 28.5 percent and 4.5 percent versus 8.4 percent, respectively). Impacts were largest among children who enrolled for a specific medical reason (such as an illness or injury); indeed, the impact on functional limitations was evident only for this subgroup. The study group also had fewer missed school days than the comparison group, but the difference was significant only among children who did not enroll for a medical reason. Health insurance coverage of undocumented children in Santa Clara County was associated with significant improvements in children's health status. The size of this association could be overstated, since the comparison sample included some children who enrolled because of an illness or other temporary health problem that would have improved even without insurance coverage. However, even after limiting the study sample to children who did not enroll for a medical reason, a significant association remained between children's reported health and their health coverage. We thus cautiously conclude that Healthy Kids had a favorable impact on children's health.
    Health Services Research 05/2007; 42(2):867-89. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00625.x · 2.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent findings suggest the prevalence of osteoporosis among men is under-recognized. The patient population of the Veterans Health Administration (VA) is predominantly male and many elderly veterans may be at risk of osteoporosis. Given the lack of data on male osteoporosis, we provide initial insight into diagnostic procedures for patients at one VA medical center. A review and descriptive analysis of patients undergoing radiological evaluation for osteoporosis at one VA medical center. We identified 4,919 patients who had bone mineral density scans from 2001-2004. VA patients receiving bone mineral density scans were commonly white, male, over age 70 and taking medications with potential bone-loss side effects. While further research is needed, preliminary evidence suggests that the VA screens the most vulnerable age groups in both genders. Heightened awareness among primary care providers of elderly male patients at risk of osteoporosis can lead to early intervention and improved management of this age-related condition.
    Clinical Interventions in Aging 02/2007; 2(2):255-61. · 1.82 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neighbourhood income level is associated with the incidence of stroke and stroke-related mortality. It has also been linked to receipt of appropriate services, post discharge motor recovery and functional status following a stroke. We examined the impact of neighbourhood income on participation among community-dwelling stroke survivors during the two years following the stroke. Secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study. Participants were 67 individuals who were treated in acute care or rehabilitation following a first ever stroke, and were discharged to the community with FIM™ scores of at least 3 for comprehension, memory and problem solving. On this functional independence measure, these scores indicate that assistance is needed with related tasks up to 50 % of the time. Participation at 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24-months post stroke was measured using the Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI). Income was measured by median neighbourhood annual family income according to postal code. The impact of very low neighbourhood income (median family income $20,000 Cdn or less) on participation at each follow-up period was determined controlling for potential confounders. Six (9.0 %) of the participants lived in very low-income neighbourhoods. These participants had average RNLI scores approximately 25 % lower at each follow-up period. While there was a trend for increasing participation with time among those in higher income neighbourhoods, this was not seen among very low-income neighbourhood participants. Very low me neighbourhood income had an independent effect on participation after controlling for discharge FIM™, 2-min walk test, gender, self-rated health, age, and emotional well-being at all follow-up periods. Our results indicate that very low neighbourhood income is linked with decreased participation during the first two years following stroke. Our findings indicate the need for further investigation of this relationship, and the importance of close follow-up of stroke survivors living in very low-income contexts.
    BMC Public Health 06/2015; 15:528. DOI:10.1186/s12889-015-1872-5 · 2.32 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
2 Downloads
Available from