Article

A multi-centre European study of factors affecting the discharge destination of older people admitted to hospital: analysis of in-hospital data from the ACMEplus project.

Medicine for the Elderly, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Age and Ageing (Impact Factor: 3.11). 10/2005; 34(5):467-75. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afi141
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT to examine the relationship between seven predictor variables (recorded on Day 3 of hospital admission) and discharge destination in non-elective medical patients aged 65+ years.
prospective cohort.
eight centres in six European countries. PREDICTOR VARIABLES: age, gender, living alone, physical function (three categories based on Barthel Index), cognition (Katzman's orientation-memory-concentration test), main body system affected (based on International Classification of Diseases), number of geriatric giants (GGs) involved in the referral (a GG being a problem with falling, mobility, continence or cognition).
discharge destination (by Day 90) in three categories: 'HOMESAME' (return to previous residence), 'INSTIN90' (discharge to alternative residence or still in hospital at 90 days), 'DEADINHO' (death in hospital),
in 1,626 patients, discharge destination was HOMESAME in 84.7%, DEADINHO in 8.9% and INSTIN90 in 6.4%. Mean duration of stay was 17.7 days, median 12. Univariate analyses showed a statistically significant relationship between all seven predictor variables and discharge destination. Physical function was the best single predictor with a seven-fold difference in adverse outcome rates between the best and worst categories. On multiple logistic regression, significant predictor variables were as follows. (i) For DEADINHO: physical function, cognition, gender; (ii) for INSTIN90: physical function, living alone, GGs, age, gender. Multiple linear regression identified physical function, GGs and living alone as predictors of loge length of stay.
case-mix systems to compare risk-adjusted hospital outcome in older medical patients need to incorporate information about physical function, cognition and presenting problems in addition to diagnosis.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
147 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and aims Ageing trends in populations are common amongst most European countries. One of the consequences of this trend is the increase of hospitalisation of elderly patients. To better manage the elderly population hospitalisation, it is crucial to obtain a better understanding of this population’s clinical and functional conditions and their hospitalisation outcome predictors. The present prospective observational cohort study aimed at studying the variables considered predictive of the length of stay, of destination at discharge, of re-hospitalisation, and of mortality at 6 months of elderly (age >64 years, N = 329) admitted to ten geriatric units, having different missions (e.g., cognitive impairment and dementia; movement disorders; bone fractures and immobilisation syndrome; or stroke), of the St. John of God Order during a 4-month-long index period. Methods The patients were monitored from the first day of hospitalisation through the discharge. Researchers filled in a “Patient Schedule” based on a comprehensive set of socio-demographic and clinical variables and standardised assessment tools. We used a standardised telephone interview to re-assess patients at the 6-month follow-up. Results The BRASS score proved to be a better reliable predictor of length of stay (F = 3.9, p = 0.04) among all variables associated with higher risks of prolonged hospital stay and post-discharge problems. In addition, discharge destination was also predicted by the use of the Tinetti Scale score (OR = 0.95, 95 % CI 0.90–0.99), the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (OR = 0.1.07, 95 % CI 1.01–1.13) and by independence in daily activity as measured by the IADL scale (OR = 4.09, 95 % CI 1.46–11.44). Motor functioning resulted as a reliable predictor (OR = 2.67, 95 % CI 1.27–5.59) of re-hospitalisation in all the medical units. Lastly, female gender (OR = 0.28, 95 % CI 0.11–0.71) resulted as the only reliable variable associated with a lower mortality risk after discharge. Conclusion The variables related to the clinical and functional status were reliable predictors for length of stay, for discharge destination, and for re-hospitalisation among older patients admitted to ten geriatric units in Italy. Further research is needed to establish valid and reliable predictors of mortality risk, to develop effective preventive strategies in those vulnerable populations.
    Aging - Clinical and Experimental Research 10/2013; · 1.01 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Older patients, suffering from numerous diseases and taking multiple medications are the rule rather than the exception in primary care. A manifold of medical conditions are often associated with poor outcomes, and their multiple medications raise additional risks of polypharmacy. Such patients account for most healthcare expenditures. Effective approaches are needed to manage such complex patients in primary care. This paper describes the results of a scoping exercise, including a two-day workshop with 17 professionals from six countries, experienced in general practice and primary care research as well as epidemiology, clinical pharmacology, gerontology and methodology. This was followed by a consensus process investigating the challenges and core questions for multimorbidity research in primary care from a clinical perspective and presents examples of the best research practice. Current approaches in measuring and clustering multimorbidity inform policy-makers and researchers, but research is needed to provide support in clinical decision making. Multimorbidity presents a complexity of conditions leading to individual patient's needs and demanding complex processes in clinical decision making. The identification of patterns presupposes the development of strategies on how to manage multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Interventions have to be complex and multifaceted, and their evaluation poses numerous methodological challenges in study design, outcome measurement and analysis. Overall, it can be seen that complexity is a main underlying theme. Moreover, flexible study designs, outcome parameters and evaluation strategies are needed to account for this complexity.
    The European journal of general practice 10/2013; · 0.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The identification of older patients at risk of poor hospital outcomes (e.g. longer hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, and institutionalisation) is important to provide an effective healthcare service. To identify factors related to older patients' clinical, nutritional, functional and socio-demographic profiles at admission to an acute care ward that can predict poor hospital outcomes. The CRiteria to assess appropriate Medication use among Elderly complex patients project was a multicentre, observational study performed in geriatric and internal medicine acute care wards of seven Italian hospitals. One thousand one hundred twenty-three consecutively admitted patients aged 65 years or older. Hospital outcomes were length of stay, in-hospital mortality, and institutionalisation. Mean age of participants was 81 years, 56% were women. Median length of stay was 10 (7-14) days, 41 patients died during hospital stay and 37 were newly institutionalised. Number of drugs before admission, metastasized cancer, renal failure or dialysis, infection, falls at home during the last year, pain, and walking speed were independent predictors of LoS. Total dependency in activities of daily living and inability to perform grip strength test were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Malnutrition and total dependency in activities of daily living were independent predictors of institutionalisation. Our results confirm that not only diseases, but also multifaceted aspects of ageing such as physical function and malnutrition are strong predictors of hospital outcomes and suggest that these variables should be systematically recorded.
    PLoS ONE 12/2014; 9(12):e115413. · 3.53 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
84 Downloads
Available from
May 27, 2014