Quality of care by classification of myocardial infarction - Treatment patterns for ST-segment elevation vs non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
Archives of Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 13.25). 08/2005; 165(14):1630-6. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.14.1630
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Practice guidelines for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) recommend similar therapies and interventions, but differences in patterns of care between MI categories have not been well described in contemporary practice.
In-hospital treatments with similar recommendations from practice guidelines were compared with outcomes in 185 968 eligible patients (without listed contraindications) with STEMI (n = 53 417; 29%) vs NSTEMI (n = 132 551; 71%) from 1247 US hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 4 between July 1, 2000, and June 30, 2002. Hierarchical logistic regression modeling was used to determine adjusted differences in treatment patterns in MI categories.
Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates were high for NSTEMI (12.5%) and STEMI (14.3%), and the use of guideline-recommended medications and interventions was suboptimal in both categories of patients with MI. The adjusted likelihood of receiving early (within 24 hours of presentation) aspirin, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was higher in patients with STEMI. Similar patterns of care were noted at hospital discharge: the adjusted likelihood of receiving aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, lipid-lowering agents, smoking cessation counseling, and cardiac rehabilitation referral was higher in patients with STEMI.
Evidence-based medications and lifestyle modification interventions were used less frequently in patients with NSTEMI. Quality improvement interventions designed to narrow the gaps in care between NSTEMI and STEMI and to improve adherence to guidelines for both categories of patients with MI may reduce the high mortality rates associated with acute MI in contemporary practice.

Download full-text


Available from: Charles V Pollack, Aug 14, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cardiac rehabilitation is a key component of the comprehensive care of the 79.4 million adults in the United States with one or more forms of cardiovascular disease. Only a fraction of eligible candidates complete cardiac rehabilitation and women are at a significantly higher risk for underutilizing this safe and effective secondary prevention intervention. This article reviews the complex array of barriers to cardiac rehabilitation, with a focus on those factors that are unique to women. The Healthcare Utilization Model is used as a theoretical framework to categorize these barriers into environmental, physician, and patient level categories. These barriers, although challenging for both patients and healthcare professionals, provide opportunities for change. Actionable evidence-based recommendations for healthcare professionals include making changes in health policy, using proven performance improvement methodologies to increase referral and enrollment, using interdisciplinary models of communication, and enhancing cardiac rehabilitation program attributes reflective of women's preferences and needs.
    Cardiology in review 01/2008; 16(1):36-52. DOI:10.1097/CRD.0b013e31815aff8b · 3.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is the initial test in patients with suspected ACS. The ECG is the defining element of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Its most important use is in the detection of acute coronary obstruction, and it is the most important, cost-effective, and immediately available initial test in the decision for emergency reperfusion therapy. There is a recent interest in refining the sensitivity and specificity of the ECG for coronary occlusion, and thus for identifying subtle STEMI, as well as in recognizing pseudoinfarction patterns and thus avoiding false positive cath lab activations. Studies assessing the accuracy of cath lab activation, the differentiation of precordial ST-segment elevation due to normal variant from that of anterior STEMI, the diagnosis of STEMI in the presence of left bundle branch block, the differentiation of benign inferior ST-segment elevation from that of inferior STEMI, and the importance of ST-segment elevation in lead aVR will be discussed.
    03/2012; 1(1). DOI:10.1007/s40138-012-0003-1
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk index (TRI) to characterize the risk of death among patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The TRI, calculated from baseline age, systolic pressure, and heart rate, was established in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and is predictive of mortality. Patients presenting with NSTEMI are increasing compared to STEMI and constitute a group with varied risk. The TRI was calculated in 337,192 patients from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction with NSTEMI. Values and outcomes were compared with 153,486 patients with STEMI classified by reperfusion status. Comparisons of baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes stratified by TRI were made. There was a graded relationship between the TRI and mortality in patients with NSTEMI with a >30-fold difference in mortality rates between lowest and highest deciles (p < 0.0001). The index showed good discrimination (c = 0.73). Overall mortality in the group with NSTEMI was higher (10.9%) than patients with STEMI treated with (6.6%) but lower than for STEMI patients not receiving reperfusion therapy (18.7%). The higher risk in comparison to patients with STEMI treated with reperfusion therapy was explained largely by the higher-risk profile of the population with NSTEMI. There is a graded relationship between TRI and mortality in patients with NSTEMI. This simple risk index provides important information about mortality in patients across the spectrum of myocardial infarction, STEMI and NSTEMI. Early identification of NSTEMI patients who are at high risk of in-hospital mortality may provide clinicians with important information for initial triage and treatment.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology 04/2006; 47(8):1553-8. DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.075 · 15.34 Impact Factor
Show more