Health care expenditures of immigrants in the United States: a nationally representative analysis.

Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric and General Internal Medicine, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Ave, IRD 627, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.23). 09/2005; 95(8):1431-8. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.044602
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We compared the health care expenditures of immigrants residing in the United States with health care expenditures of US-born persons.
We used the 1998 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey linked to the 1996-1997 National Health Interview Survey to analyze data on 18398 US-born persons and 2843 immigrants. Using a 2-part regression model, we estimated total health care expenditures, as well as expenditures for emergency department (ED) visits, office-based visits, hospital-based outpatient visits, inpatient visits, and prescription drugs.
Immigrants accounted for $39.5 billion (SE=$4 billion) in health care expenditures. After multivariate adjustment, per capita total health care expenditures of immigrants were 55% lower than those of US-born persons ($1139 vs $2546). Similarly, expenditures for uninsured and publicly insured immigrants were approximately half those of their US-born counterparts. Immigrant children had 74% lower per capita health care expenditures than US-born children. However, ED expenditures were more than 3 times higher for immigrant children than for US-born children.
Health care expenditures are substantially lower for immigrants than for US-born persons. Our study refutes the assumption that immigrants represent a disproportionate financial burden on the US health care system.

Download full-text


Available from: Olveen Carrasquillo, Jun 19, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the association between the Great Recession of 2007-2009 and health care expenditures along the health care spending distribution, with a focus on racial/ethnic disparities. Secondary data analyses of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2005-2006 and 2008-2009). Quantile multivariate regressions are employed to measure the different associations between the economic recession of 2007-2009 and health care spending. Race/ethnicity and interaction terms between race/ethnicity and a recession indicator are controlled to examine whether minorities encountered disproportionately lower health spending during the economic recession. The Great Recession was significantly associated with reductions in health care expenditures at the 10th-50th percentiles of the distribution, but not at the 75th-90th percentiles. Racial and ethnic disparities were more substantial at the lower end of the health expenditure distribution; however, on average the reduction in expenditures was similar for all race/ethnic groups. The Great Recession was also positively associated with spending on emergency department visits. This study shows that the relationship between the Great Recession and health care spending varied along the health expenditure distribution. More variability was observed in the lower end of the health spending distribution compared to the higher end.
    Health Services Research 10/2013; DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12113 · 2.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study explores the social determinants of diabetes in a low-income, Latino, and immigrant neighborhood in a Californian city, emphasizing food environments. We conducted focus groups and semi-structured interviews of a convenience sample of staff and clients at a local non-governmental organization. Eight themes emerged as key barriers to healthy eating: (1) cost of food vis-à-vis income; (2) transportation; (3) language; (4) stigma; (5) immigration status; (6) insufficient formal/informal food assistance; (7) work conditions; and (8) competing basic needs/constraints of poverty. We conclude that the public health and health education rhetoric of ‘individual choice’ is a barrier in itself to understanding the diabetes epidemic, and that without the recognition and understanding of, and intervention upon, socioeconomic, policy, and political barriers to healthy lifestyles, the prevention of diabetes will remain out of reach.
    Critical Public Health 01/2011; 22(2):1-12. DOI:10.1080/09581596.2011.630383 · 0.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and Purpose: While new Latino immigrants tend to be healthier than the general population, their health deteriorates in time with acculturation (Zsembik & Fennell, 2005). This is often attributed to lack of health insurance and access to health care services (Prentice, Pebley, & Sastryl, 2005). Also, many immigrants are unaware of the health and community resources available to them (Yu, Huang, Schwalber, & Kogan, 2005). The purpose of this study was: 1) to examine patterns of health seeking behavior among undocumented Mexican immigrants, specifically where they choose to receive health care services; and 2) to ascertain sources of health care information among these immigrants Methods: This study is a secondary analysis of the Mexican Migrant Worker Survey conducted by the Pew Hispanic Center (Suro, 2005). The study was a convenience sample of 4,836 Mexican migrants in the United States interviewed while applying for an identity document issued by Mexican consulates. As the immigrants had no legal papers authorizing them to be in the United States, they were assumed to be undocumented or unauthorized. The dependent variable in this study was the binary variable of choosing ER for medical care. Potential predictors of ER use included gender, age, education, level of income, marital status, employment status, length of residence in U.S., number of children, having family in the same town, and city where data were collected. In addition, analysis controlled for presence of health insurance. Respondents were asked about the two most important sources from which they receive medical and health information. Analyses included binary variables indicating where information was received, including church, medical care providers, and Mexican and U.S. newspapers. Multivariate logistical regressions were used to model the relationship between ER use and explanatory variables Results: Thirty-eight percent of the respondents reported that they would use hospital ER for medical care. Those aged 29 or younger reported higher ER use rates. Those with one or two children reported the highest ER use rates (40%). ER use rates declined with time spent in the U.S. and varied significantly by data collection site. There were no statistically significant bivariate subgroup variations in ER use by education, level of English, presence of relatives in town/city or fulltime employment status. Reported ER use rates varied significantly according to the data collection site: lowest rates were observed in Los Angeles (33%); whereas in New York, Atlanta and Raleigh, rates were above 45%. Respondents receiving information from a church reported less ER use; those receiving information from newspapers reported higher ER use rates. Respondents who use churches or medical providers as a source of information had lower odds of reporting ER for medical care. Conclusions and Implications: In spite of immigration status, access to quality health care is both a human rights and a public health issue. It is in the best interest of society to offer available and affordable health care. Use of emergency rooms is an expensive, often unnecessary, use of health care resources. Suggestions for further research and policy implications are discussed.
    Journal of sociology and social welfare 01/2011; 38(4):33-50.