Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein.

Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Department of Physics of Complex Systems, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Nature (Impact Factor: 42.35). 08/2005; 436(7050):588-92. DOI: 10.1038/nature03842
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Different proteins have different expression levels. It is unclear to what extent these expression levels are optimized to their environment. Evolutionary theories suggest that protein expression levels maximize fitness, but the fitness as a function of protein level has seldom been directly measured. To address this, we studied the lac system of Escherichia coli, which allows the cell to use the sugar lactose for growth. We experimentally measured the growth burden due to production and maintenance of the Lac proteins (cost), as well as the growth advantage (benefit) conferred by the Lac proteins when lactose is present. The fitness function, given by the difference between the benefit and the cost, predicts that for each lactose environment there exists an optimal Lac expression level that maximizes growth rate. We then performed serial dilution evolution experiments at different lactose concentrations. In a few hundred generations, cells evolved to reach the predicted optimal expression levels. Thus, protein expression from the lac operon seems to be a solution of a cost-benefit optimization problem, and can be rapidly tuned by evolution to function optimally in new environments.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A central aim of cell biology was to understand the strategy of gene expression in response to the environment. Here, we study gene expression response to metabolic challenges in exponentially growing Escherichia coli using mass spectrometry. Despite enormous complexity in the details of the underlying regulatory network, we find that the proteome partitions into several coarse-grained sectors, with each sector's total mass abundance exhibiting positive or negative linear relations with the growth rate. The growth rate-dependent components of the proteome fractions comprise about half of the proteome by mass, and their mutual dependencies can be characterized by a simple flux model involving only two effective parameters. The success and apparent generality of this model arises from tight coordination between proteome partition and metabolism, suggesting a principle for resource allocation in proteome economy of the cell. This strategy of global gene regulation should serve as a basis for future studies on gene expression and constructing synthetic biological circuits. Coarse graining may be an effective approach to derive predictive phenomenological models for other 'omics' studies. © 2015 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.
    Molecular Systems Biology 02/2015; 11(2). DOI:10.15252/msb.20145697 · 14.10 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We are interested in the balance of energy and protein synthesis in bacterial growth. How has evolution optimized this balance? We describe an analytical model that leverages extensive literature data on growth laws to infer the underlying fitness landscape and to draw inferences about what evolution has optimized in Escherichia coli. Is E. coli optimized for growth speed, energy efficiency, or some other property? Experimental data show that at its replication speed limit, E. coli produces about four mass equivalents of nonribosomal proteins for every mass equivalent of ribosomes. This ratio can be explained if the cell's fitness function is the the energy efficiency of cells under fast growth conditions, indicating a tradeoff between the high energy costs of ribosomes under fast growth and the high energy costs of turning over nonribosomal proteins under slow growth. This model gives insight into some of the complex nonlinear relationships between energy utilization and ribosomal and nonribosomal production as a function of cell growth conditions.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 01/2015; 112(2):406-411. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1421138111 · 9.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Maximisation of growth rate is an important fitness strategy for bacteria. Bacteria can achieve this by expressing proteins at optimal concentrations, such that resources are not wasted. This is exemplified for Escherichia coli by the increase of its ribosomal protein-fraction with growth rate which precisely matches the increased protein synthesis demand. These findings and others have led to the hypothesis that E. coli aims to maximise its growth rate in environments that support growth. However, what kind of regulatory strategy is required for robust, optimal adjustment of the ribosome concentration to the prevailing condition is still an open question. Here, we analyse coli 's ppGpp-controlled mechanism of ribosome expression and show that this mechanism main- tains the ribosomes saturated with its substrates. In this manner, overexpression of the highly abundant ribosomal proteins is prevented, and limited resources can be redirected to the synthesis of other growth-promoting enzymes. It turns out that the kinetic conditions for robust, optimal protein-partitioning, required for growth rate maximisation across conditions, can be achieved with basic biochemical interactions. We show that inactive ribosomes are the most suitable "signal" to track the intracellular nutritional state and adjust gene expression accordingly, as small deviations from optimal ribosome concentration cause a huge fractional change in ribosome inactivity. We expect to find this control logic implemented across fast-growing microbial species, as growth rate maximisation is a common selective pressure, ribosomes are typically highly abundant and thus costly, and the required control can be implemented by a small, simple network. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    FEBS Journal 03/2015; DOI:10.1111/febs.13258 · 3.99 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 27, 2014