Article

Addiction: A disease of learning and memory

Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
American Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 13.56). 09/2005; 162(8):1414-22. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.8.1414
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT If neurobiology is ultimately to contribute to the development of successful treatments for drug addiction, researchers must discover the molecular mechanisms by which drug-seeking behaviors are consolidated into compulsive use, the mechanisms that underlie the long persistence of relapse risk, and the mechanisms by which drug-associated cues come to control behavior. Evidence at the molecular, cellular, systems, behavioral, and computational levels of analysis is converging to suggest the view that addiction represents a pathological usurpation of the neural mechanisms of learning and memory that under normal circumstances serve to shape survival behaviors related to the pursuit of rewards and the cues that predict them. The author summarizes the converging evidence in this area and highlights key questions that remain.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
121 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RESUMEN. La adicción es un trastorno multifactorial que involucra el consumo compulsivo de sustancias a pesar de las consecuencias negativas asociadas y que se caracteriza por múltiples recaídas. El presente trabajo es una revisión acerca de los mecanismos de acción de algunas drogas de abuso, donde se señalan las simili-tudes entre los procesos adictivos y los mnemónicos. Las sustancias de abuso ejercen sus acciones a través de diferentes mecanismos y sistemas de neurotransmisión y pueden producir cambios estructurales de largo plazo en el cerebro. En los últimos años, se ha estudiado a la adicción como un aprendizaje patológico en el que las drogas utilizan las mismas vías que las recompensas naturales para perpetuar su consumo. El paciente adicto aprende y crea asociaciones entre el consumo de drogas y estados gratificantes que se consolidan en memorias duraderas incluso cuando se desarrolla tolerancia a dichos efectos. La adicción y la memoria comparten meca-nismos celulares, moleculares y epigenéticos. Su comprensión puede mejorar la eficacia de las intervenciones terapéuticas. Palabras clave: Adicciones, drogas de abuso, epigenética, memoria. ABSTRACT. Drug addiction is a multifactorial disorder that involves compulsive substance use despite negative consequences, and is characterized by frequent relapses. This paper reviews the mechanisms of action of some drugs of abuse, showing the similarities between addictive and mnemonic processes. Drugs of abuse exert their actions through different mechanisms and neurotransmitter systems and may cause long-term structural changes in the brain. In recent years, addiction has been studied as a pathological condition in which drugs act through the same pathways that are used by natural rewards to perpetuate their use. The addicted patient learns and creates associations between drug use and rewarding effects that are consolidated into long-lasting memories even when tolerance develops to these effects. Addiction and memory share cellular , molecular and epigenetic mechanisms. Their understanding can improve therapeutic intervention efficacy. Este artículo puede ser consultado en versión completa en
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Understanding how stimulant drugs affect memory is important for understanding their addictive potential. Here we examined the effects of acute d-methamphetamine (METH), administered either before (encoding phase) or immediately after (consolidation phase) study on memory for emotional and neutral images in healthy humans. Young adult volunteers (N = 60) were randomly assigned to either an encoding group (N = 29) or a consolidation group (N = 31). Across three experimental sessions, they received placebo and two doses of METH (10, 20 mg) either 45 min before (encoding) or immediately after (consolidation) viewing pictures of emotionally positive, neutral, and negative scenes. Memory for the pictures was tested two days later, under drug-free conditions. Half of the sample reported sleep disturbances following the high dose of METH, which affected their memory performance. Therefore, participants were classified as poor sleepers (less than 6 hours; n = 29) or adequate sleepers (6 or more hours; n = 31) prior to analyses. For adequate sleepers, METH (20 mg) administered before encoding significantly improved memory accuracy relative to placebo, especially for emotional (positive and negative), compared to neutral, stimuli. For poor sleepers in the encoding group, METH impaired memory. METH did not affect memory in the consolidation group regardless of sleep quality. These results extend previous findings showing that METH can enhance memory for salient emotional stimuli but only if it is present at the time of study, where it can affect both encoding and consolidation. METH does not appear to facilitate consolidation if administered after encoding. The study also demonstrates the important role of sleep in memory studies.
    PLoS ONE 10(2):e0117062. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0117062 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A common criticism of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) is that its criteria are based more on behavioral descriptions than on underlying biological mechanisms. Increasingly, calls have intensified for a more biologically-based approach to conceptualizing, studying, and treating psychological disorders, as exemplified by the Research Domain Criteria Project (RDoC). Among the most well-studied neurobiological mechanisms is reward processing. Moreover, individual differences in reward sensitivity are related to risk for substance abuse and depression. The current review synthesizes the available preclinical, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging literature on reward processing from a transdiagnostic, multidimensional perspective. Findings are organized with respect to key reward constructs within the Positive Valence Systems domain of the RDoC matrix, including initial responsiveness to reward (physiological 'liking'), approach motivation (physiological 'wanting'), and reward learning/habit formation. The current review (a) describes the neural basis of reward, (b) elucidate differences in reward activity in substance abuse and depression, and (c) suggest a framework for integrating these disparate literatures and discuss the utility of shifting focus from diagnosis to process for understanding liability and co-morbidity. Ultimately, we believe that an integrative focus on abnormal reward functioning across the full continuum of clinically heterogeneous samples, rather than within circumscribed diagnostic categories, might actually help to refine the phenotype and improve the prediction of onset and recovery of these disorders. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    International journal of psychophysiology: official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology 02/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.01.011 · 3.05 Impact Factor

Preview (2 Sources)

Download
4 Downloads