Article

Transport of chemical and microbial compounds from known wastewater discharges: potential for use as indicators of human fecal contamination.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, MS 564, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, USA.
Environmental Science and Technology (Impact Factor: 5.48). 08/2005; 39(14):5157-69. DOI: 10.1021/es048120k
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The quality of drinking and recreational water is currently (2005) determined using indicator bacteria. However, the culture tests used to analyze forthese bacteria require a long time to complete and do not discriminate between human and animal fecal material sources. One complementary approach is to use chemicals found in human wastewater, which would have the advantages of (1) potentially shorter analysis times than the bacterial culture tests and (2) being selected for human-source specificity. At 10 locations, water samples were collected upstream and at two successive points downstream from a wastewaster treatment plant (WWTP); a treated effluent sample was also collected at each WWTP. This sampling plan was used to determine the persistence of a chemically diverse suite of emerging contaminants in streams. Samples were also collected at two reference locations assumed to have minimal human impacts. Of the 110 chemical analytes investigated in this project, 78 were detected at least once. The number of compounds in a given sample ranged from 3 at a reference location to 50 in a WWTP effluent sample. The total analyte load at each location varied from 0.018 microg/L at the reference location to 97.7 microg/L in a separate WWTP effluent sample. Although most of the compound concentrations were in the range of 0.01-1.0 microg/L, in some samples, individual concentrations were in the range of 5-38 microg/L. The concentrations of the majority of the chemicals present in the samples generally followed the expected trend: they were either nonexistent or at trace levels in the upstream samples, had their maximum concentrations in the WWTP effluent samples, and then declined in the two downstream samples. This research suggests that selected chemicals are useful as tracers of human wastewater discharge.

2 Followers
 · 
195 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Landfill leachate samples (n=11) were collected from five USA municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills and analyzed for ten trace organic pollutants that are commonly detected in surface and municipal wastewater effluents (viz., carbamazepine, DEET, fluoxetine, gemfibrozil, PFOA, PFOS, primidone, sucralose, sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim). Carbamazepine, DEET, PFOA and primidone were detected in all leachate samples analyzed and gemfibrozil was detected in samples from four of the five-landfill sites. The contaminants found in the highest concentrations were DEET (6900-143000ngL(-1)) and sucralose (<10-621000ngL(-1)). Several compounds were not detected (fluoxetine) or detected infrequently (sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim and PFOS). Using the average mass of DEET in leachate amongst the five landfills and scaling the mass release from the five test landfills to the USA population of landfills, an order of magnitude estimate is that over 10000kg DEETyr(-1) may be released in leachate. Some pharmaceuticals have similar annual mean discharges to one another, with the estimated annual discharge of carbamazepine, gemfibrozil, primidone equating to 53, 151 and 128kgyear(-1). To the authors knowledge, this is the first time that primidone has been included in a landfill leachate study. While the estimates developed in this study are order of magnitude, the values do suggest the need for further research to better quantify the amount of chemicals sent to wastewater treatment facilities with landfill leachate, potential impacts on treatment processes and the significance of landfill leachate as a source of surface water contamination. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Chemosphere 03/2015; 127C:269-275. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.02.030
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fecal contamination of source waters is an important issue to the drinking water industry. Improper disposal of animal waste, leaky septic tanks, storm runoff, and wildlife can all be responsible for spreading enteric pathogens into source waters. As a result, methods that can pinpoint fecal pollution sources in natural waters are needed to assist in the development and evaluation of adequate management practices targeting pollution control. In the last decade, several methods have been developed to identify fecal sources, collectively known as microbial source tracking (MST) methods. Early studies focused on the use of methods that rely on generating library dependent databases. More recently library independent PCR-based approaches have become more popular among MST practitioners as they do not rely on the development of large culture-based databases. One potential concern associated with the use of library independent approaches relates to the development of host-specific assays using sequencing information from genes not involved in host-microbial interactions. To address this issue, our research group has applied a novel method called genome fragment enrichment (GFE) to select for genomic regions that differ between different fecal metagenomes. We have shown that the vast majority of the selected fragments are indeed specific to the fecal community in question suggesting that this is an efficient way of enriching for community specific DNA regions. Sequences from the enriched fragments were used to develop host-specific PCR assays. Thus far, we have successfully developed several assays specific to human, cow, and chicken fecal communities. Additionally, several assays are capable of detecting multiple avian species, further suggesting that similar gut environments can select for similar host-specific populations. The latter finding is relevant as it shows that is possible to develop assays targeting multiple species. Signals from metagenomic-based assays were detected in water samples demonstrating their potential as source tracking tools. A brief summary of the history and limitations of current MST tools and the discussion of results with metagenomic markers will be the main topics of this manuscript. The need for a risk assessment tool-box that includes assays targeting indicators, source identifiers and pathogens will also be discussed.
    01/2007; 2007(1):646-661. DOI:10.2175/193864707787932496
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Millions of tourists visit Kenting National Park (KNP) in southern Taiwan every year, causing great amount of sewage discharges in this area. This study aimed to assess the impact of sewage on KNP surface waters using zebrafish embryo-larval bioassays combined with chemical analyses of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs). Surface water samples were collected monthly from May to October in 2010. During the monthly bioassays, zebrafish embryos were exposed to the water samples for 144 h. Hatchability, embryonic heart rate, larval survival rate, and deformities were recorded. Larval swimming behavior was also digitally quantified at the end of exposure. Significant decreases in hatchability and larval survival rate were observed at all sites. Both hatchability and larval survival rate were negatively correlated with nitrite and ammonia concentrations in the water. The field water had little effect on embryonic heart rate and morphology. However, lower swimming speeds and activity levels were observed in the larvae, suggesting neurobehavioral toxicity of the surface waters. The general detection frequency of the 28 target PPCPs was 75 %. High levels of some PPCPs, particularly caffeine, N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide (DEET), and nonylphenol, were measured in the water samples. Our results show that surface waters in KNP have been strongly impacted by human activities, resulting in lethal and behavioral toxicities in developing fish.
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 05/2015; 187(5):4511. DOI:10.1007/s10661-015-4511-9

Full-text (3 Sources)

Download
51 Downloads
Available from
Jun 4, 2014