A Comparative Review of Classification Systems in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Seminars in Oncology (Impact Factor: 3.9). 09/2005; 32(4 Suppl 5):S3-10. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.06.021
Source: PubMed


Reliable classification and prognostic scoring systems for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are needed to facilitate medically appropriate treatment and management decisions. The French-American-British (FAB) classification scheme for MDS was described in 1982 and has become the reference standard for subsequent MDS classification schemes. The FAB classification system divides MDS into five subgroups, based mainly on morphologic criteria and the percentage of myeloblasts in bone marrow (BM). More recently, the increasing availability of BM cytogenetics, immunologic markers, and molecular genetics has provided important information for staging, prognosis, and treatment of MDS. A World Health Organization panel incorporated this new diagnostic information into a revised classification system that modified the FAB criteria while retaining most of its basic features. The major changes included the creation of additional categories (eg, 5q- syndrome), distinction of unilineage from multilineage dysplasias in the refractory anemias, and subdivision of the heterogeneous refractory anemias with excess blasts into two categories based on BM blast percentage. Additionally, some MDS subtypes were removed or merged with other myeloid disorders into newly created categories. In independent validations, the World Health Organization revisions were shown to provide more-homogeneous subgroups of patients and greater prognostic power compared with the FAB system, although controversies remain. The International Prognostic Scoring System combines blast percentage, karyotype, and number of cytopenias to generate a scoring system that reliably estimates survival and risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia for patients with MDS. This universally accepted scoring system is often combined with FAB or World Health Organization morphologic criteria to provide a more complete clinical picture and the most accurate prognostic assessment possible. As more is learned about the pathogenesis of MDS at the molecular level, it is anticipated that these classification and scoring systems will continue to evolve to incorporate the new information.

39 Reads
  • Source
    • "A number of risk factors concerning survival and AMLdevelopment have been identified in the past [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. For some of these factors, like age, the prognostic impact on survival may be quite different from the impact on AML development. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The classification, scoring systems, and response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have recently been updated and have become widely accepted. In addition, several new effective targeted drugs for patients with MDS have been developed. The current article provides a summary of updated and newly proposed markers, criteria, and standards in MDS, with special reference to the diagnostic interface and refinements in evaluations and scoring. Concerning the diagnostic interface, minimal diagnostic criteria for MDS are proposed, and for patients with unexplained cytopenia who do not fulfill these criteria, the term 'idiopathic cytopenia of uncertain significance' (ICUS) is suggested. In addition, new diagnostic and prognostic parameters, histopathologic and immunologic determinants, proposed refinements in scoring systems, and new therapeutic approaches are discussed. Respective algorithms and recommendations should facilitate diagnostic and prognostic evaluations in MDS, selection of patients for therapies, and the conduct of clinical trials.
    Leukemia Research 07/2007; 31(6):727-36. DOI:10.1016/j.leukres.2006.11.009 · 2.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Telomeres, consisting of nucleotide repeats and a protein complex at chromosome ends, are essential in maintaining chromosomal integrity. Dyskeratosis congenita (DC) is the inherited bone marrow failure syndrome (IBMFS) that epitomizes the effects of abnormal telomere biology. Patients with DC have extremely short telomere lengths (<1st percentile) and many have mutations in telomere biology genes. Interpretation of telomere length in other IBMFSs is less straightforward. Abnormal telomere shortening has been reported in patients with apparently acquired hematologic disorders, including aplastic anemia, myeolodysplasia, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, and leukemia. In these disorders, the shortest-lived cells have the shortest telomeres, suggestive of increased hematopoietic stress. Telomeres are also markers of replicative and/or oxidative stress in other complex disease pathways, such as inflammation, stress, and carcinogenesis. The spectrum of related disorders caused by mutations in telomere biology genes extends beyond classical DC to include marrow failure that does not respond to immunosuppression, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and possibly other syndromes. We suggest that such patients be categorized as having an inherited disorder of telomere biology. Longitudinal studies of patients with very short telomeres but without classical DC are necessary to further understand the long-term sequelae, such as malignancy, osteonecrosis/osteoporosis, and pulmonary and liver disease.
    Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 01/2008; 129(1-2):35-47. DOI:10.1016/j.mad.2007.11.002 · 3.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal, neoplastic disorders of hematopoietic tissue that convey a guarded prognosis, but physicians vary in whether they refer to MDS as a “cancer” when discussing the diagnosis with patients. Because of past ambiguity about whether MDS is truly a malignancy, confusion about MDS terminology is widespread. Additionally, patients who carry one of the dubious cancer-specific health insurance policies are usually not eligible for financial benefits when they receive a diagnosis of MDS. Likewise, patients with MDS who have been led to believe they do not have a form of cancer by their primary physician may become upset when seeing another health care provider who does refer to MDS in this way. Here, I discuss evidence supporting broader consideration of MDS as a form of malignant neoplasia – i.e., cancer – as well as some of the relevant practical issues.
    [Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology 04/1998; 39(3):235.
Show more

Similar Publications

Preview (2 Sources)

39 Reads
Available from