Article

UniSpacer arthroplasty of the knee.

Los Angeles Orthopaedic Institute, 4955 Van Nuys Boulevard, Suite 615, Sherman Oaks, California 91403, USA.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.23). 09/2005; 87(8):1706-11. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02339
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The operative treatment of medial compartment knee arthritis is controversial. The purpose of the present study was to report the experience of a single surgeon with the UniSpacer arthroplasty for the treatment of isolated medial compartment arthritis of the knee.
From April 2002 through November 2002, thirty-seven UniSpacer arthroplasties were performed in thirty-four patients for the treatment of arthritis that primarily involved the medial compartment of the knee. The Ahlbäck radiographic evaluation scale was used to grade the severity of arthritis; the mean preoperative score was 2.6 points for the medial compartment and 0.5 point for both the lateral and patellofemoral compartments. The study group included eighteen women (nineteen knees) and sixteen men (eighteen knees) who had a mean age of fifty-five years (range, forty-two to seventy-five years) at the time of surgery. Twelve patients had had a previous arthroscopic meniscectomy. The mean preoperative Knee Society function score was 60 points (range, 40 to 80 points), and the mean preoperative Knee Society objective score was 62 points (range, 40 to 76 points).
After a mean duration of follow-up of twenty-six months (range, twenty-four to twenty-nine months), there were no excellent, ten good, fifteen fair, and twelve poor results. The mean postoperative total function score was 69 points (range, 40 to 82 points), and the mean Knee Society objective score was 72 points (range, 45 to 88 points). Six of the twelve poor results were in knees that had dislocation of the UniSpacer. All twelve knees were revised to a total knee arthroplasty.
On the basis of this experience, we do not recommend UniSpacer arthroplasty for the treatment of degenerative arthritis of the medial compartment of the knee.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
176 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traumatic knee injury is common in young adults and strongly contributes to premature development of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Post-traumatic knee OA poses a therapeutic dilemma to the physician, since no known therapy has an acceptable safety profile, effectively relieves joint pain, and enjoys reasonable patient acceptance. Consequently, these young patients will ultimately be faced with the decision to either undergo surgical intervention, despite prosthesis durability concerns, or to continue with ineffective nonsurgical treatment. Emerging therapies, such as biologics, disease-modifying drugs, partial joint resurfacings, and minimally invasive joint-unloading implants are currently being studied to fill this therapeutic void in the young patient with post-traumatic knee OA.
    Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 01/2014; 5:73-79.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE. This article reviews current concepts of knee replacement. Features of traditional and new prosthetic designs, materials, and surgical techniques are discussed. Normal and abnormal postoperative imaging findings are illustrated. Complications are reviewed and related to the current understanding about how and why these failures occur. CONCLUSION. It is well known that after knee replacement, patients with complications may be asymptomatic, and, for this reason, assessment of postoperative imaging is important. The foundation of radiologic interpretation of knee replacement is knowledge of the physiologic purpose, orthopedic trends, imaging findings, and complications.
    American Journal of Roentgenology 12/2013; 201(6):W828-W842. · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Finding the right balance between tibial coverage and minimal implant overhang is an important factor in TKA. Another significant cause of failure is component malrotation. Methods An average master shape of the proximal tibia at TKA resection level was calculated using fine slice computed tomographies of 117 cadaveric knees. To find out whether alternate implant contours would be necessary depending on the patient’s body size, we established five subgroups to compare. CAD-Analysis was performed to simulate the overhang produced after ± 4°/± 7°/± 10° rotation. Results A master shape for the tibial resection cut (with a 5° posterior slope, 7 mm under lateral joint line) could be determined. Neither left vs. right knee joint, nor male vs. female nor the size subdivision appear to alter the calculated master shape significantly. The optimized shape allowing for ± 4° of rotational freedom was found to be the best variant. Conclusions Valid methods have been obtained to design a two-dimensional average shape of the tibial plateau. The modifications described in this study might come in useful, when designing future implant designs. Clinical relevance An optimized fit at the tibial plateau and lower rates of component malrotation may result in better outcomes after TKA.
    The Knee 01/2014; · 2.01 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
1 Download
Available from