Article

UniSpacer arthroplasty of the knee.

Los Angeles Orthopaedic Institute, 4955 Van Nuys Boulevard, Suite 615, Sherman Oaks, California 91403, USA.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.23). 09/2005; 87(8):1706-11. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02339
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The operative treatment of medial compartment knee arthritis is controversial. The purpose of the present study was to report the experience of a single surgeon with the UniSpacer arthroplasty for the treatment of isolated medial compartment arthritis of the knee.
From April 2002 through November 2002, thirty-seven UniSpacer arthroplasties were performed in thirty-four patients for the treatment of arthritis that primarily involved the medial compartment of the knee. The Ahlbäck radiographic evaluation scale was used to grade the severity of arthritis; the mean preoperative score was 2.6 points for the medial compartment and 0.5 point for both the lateral and patellofemoral compartments. The study group included eighteen women (nineteen knees) and sixteen men (eighteen knees) who had a mean age of fifty-five years (range, forty-two to seventy-five years) at the time of surgery. Twelve patients had had a previous arthroscopic meniscectomy. The mean preoperative Knee Society function score was 60 points (range, 40 to 80 points), and the mean preoperative Knee Society objective score was 62 points (range, 40 to 76 points).
After a mean duration of follow-up of twenty-six months (range, twenty-four to twenty-nine months), there were no excellent, ten good, fifteen fair, and twelve poor results. The mean postoperative total function score was 69 points (range, 40 to 82 points), and the mean Knee Society objective score was 72 points (range, 45 to 88 points). Six of the twelve poor results were in knees that had dislocation of the UniSpacer. All twelve knees were revised to a total knee arthroplasty.
On the basis of this experience, we do not recommend UniSpacer arthroplasty for the treatment of degenerative arthritis of the medial compartment of the knee.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
187 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: HintergrundIn der operativen Therapie der unikompartimentellen Gonarthrose des jüngeren Patienten steht neben den primären Zielen einer Funktionsverbesserung und Schmerzreduktion der Erhalt intakter Knochen- und Gelenkstrukturen im Fokus. Es stellt sich die Frage, ob ein auf Basis von MRT-Daten gefertigtes interpositionelles Knieimplantat neben den bewährten Verfahren der gelenknahen Korrekturosteotomie und dem unikompartimentellen Gelenkersatz eine mögliche Therapiealternative darstellt. Patienten und MethodenIn einer prospektiven Single-arm-Studie wurden 33Patienten mit unikompartimenteller Gonarthrose von Juni 2004 bis Mai 2008 mit einem patientenspezifischen Interpositionsimplantat versorgt (31 mediale, 2 laterale Implantate). Der mittlere Nachbeobachtungszeitraum betrug 26,6 (1–48Monate), das mittlere Patientenalter 54,5 (39–65Jahre). Neben den klinischen Befunden wurden die WOMAC Function Scale und die Knee Society Scores erfasst. Es erfolgten eine deskriptive Datenanalyse, eine Varianzanalyse für wiederholte Messungen und eine Bestimmung des Signifikanzniveaus. ErgebnisseDie Zwei-Jahres-Resultate brachten eine signifikante Verbesserung in der WOMAC Function Scale und den Knee Society Scores sowie eine nach 2Jahren im Vergleich zur präoperativen Situation unverändert gute Beweglichkeit von Extension/Flexion von 0/2/130°. Die Rate an Implantatdislokationen lag bei 6%, die Gesamtrevisionsrate bei 21%. SchlussfolgerungTrotz akzeptabler funktioneller Resultate, einer signifikanten Schmerzreduktion, einem vollen Erhalt der Knochensubstanz und einer im Vergleich zum konfektionierten Unispacer geringeren Implantatdislokationsrate besteht aufgrund der hohen Revisionsraten nach 2Jahren für den Einsatz eines individualisierten Knieinterpositionsimplantats nur eine limitierte Indikation unter Beachtung der Kontraindikationen. BackgroundBesides the primary goal of functional improvement and pain reduction, the operative treatment of unicompartmental arthritis in younger patients is focused on preservation of intact bone and joint structures. The question arises whether an interpositional knee implant based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data can be an alternative treatment option to the established procedures of high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. MethodsFrom June 2004 to May 2008 a total of 33 patients suffering from unicompartmental knee arthritis received a patient-specific interpositional implant (31 medial and 2 lateral) within a single arm trial. The mean follow-up time was 26.6months (range 1–48months) and the mean age of the patients was 54.5years (range 39–65years). In addition to the clinical results the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) function scale and the Knee Society scores were measured. A descriptive data analysis, a variance analysis for repeated measurements and a determination of significance level were carried out. ResultsThe 2–4year results showed a significant improvement in the WOMAC function scale as well as the Knee Society scores. The knee function after 2 years was comparable to the preoperative situation with an extension to flexion of 0/2/130°. The dislocation rate was 6% and the overall revision rate 21%. ConclusionDespite acceptable functional results a significant pain relief, a complete preservation of bone and a lower rate of dislocations compared to the off-the-shelf Unispacer implant there were only limited indications for the customized interpositional knee implant with respect to the given contraindications due to the high 2year revision rate. SchlüsselwörterUnikompartimentelle Gonarthrose–Hemiarthroplastik–Interpositionelle Implantate–Implantatdislokation–Patientenspezifisch KeywordsUnicompartmental knee arthritis–Hemiarthroplasty–Interpositional implant–Implant dislocation–Patient-specific
    Der Orthopäde 01/2011; 40(12):1103-1110. · 0.51 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of surgical treatment in osteoarthritis of the knee continues to evolve. The indications for arthroscopy have narrowed. Orthopedic surgeons continue to explore options less invasive than total knee replacement for isolated unicompartmental arthritis of the knee joint. In addition to arthroscopy, this article discusses the merits and drawbacks of and indications for osteotomy, interpositional arthroscopy, patellofemoral replacements, and emerging technologies for total knee replacements.
    Medical Clinics of North America 02/2009; 93(1):213-22, xii. · 2.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Recent Advances in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty, 01/2012; , ISBN: 978-953-307-841-0

Full-text

View
1 Download
Available from