Article

Fluoxetine monotherapy of bipolar type II and bipolar NOS major depression: a double-blind, placebo-substitution, continuation study.

Depression Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry bCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Bio-statistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
International Clinical Psychopharmacology (Impact Factor: 3.1). 09/2005; 20(5):257-64. DOI: 10.1097/01.yic.0000171519.64080.c9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Current guidelines for the treatment of bipolar type II (BP II) major depressive episode (MDE) recommend using either mood stabilizer monotherapy or the combination of a mood stabilizer with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). These guidelines are the result of concern over SSRI-induced manic switch episodes. We previously showed that fluoxetine monotherapy may be effective as an initial treatment for BP II and BP NOS MDE with a low manic switch rate. We now present the results of a double-blind, placebo-substitution continuation study of fluoxetine monotherapy in BP II and BP NOS patients who have recovered from their MDE. This was a two-phase study. In study phase I, patients received open-label fluoxetine monotherapy 20 mg daily for up to 8 weeks. Responders with a final 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score < or =9 were enrolled into study phase II which consisted of double-blind, placebo-substitution continuation therapy with fluoxetine 20 mg daily for up to 6 months. Outcome measures included the 17-item HAM-D and Young Mania Rating (YMR) scales. Changes in YMR scores were assessed using generalized estimating equation analysis. Relapse was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Fisher's exact test. In study phase II, 43% of fluoxetine-treated patients and 100% of placebo-treated patients relapsed during continuation therapy (P=0.08). The mean increase in YMR score in study phase II was slightly higher in the fluoxetine-treated patients (3.0+/-1.8) versus placebo-treated patients (0.2+/-0.4) (P=0.01). However, this difference was not clinically meaningful. No hypomanic switch episodes were observed during study phase II. Despite the limited sample size resulting in insufficient power to detect statistical significance in relapse rates or change in YMR scores between treatment conditions, these preliminary data appear to support previous observations demonstrating that initial and continuation fluoxetine monotherapy may be safe and effective for some patients with BP II or BP NOS MDE with a low manic switch rate. Larger-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.

0 Followers
 · 
52 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although No-Type I Bipolar spectrum disorders (NBP-I) are common, recurrent, and disabling, they are underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed in clinical practice. Several data show that NBP-I (especially BP type II) are a significant public health problem, and there is a dearth of studies of effective treatment modalities for the control of acute symptoms and the prevention of mood recurrences (mainly major depressive episodes). Considering the growing need to find effective therapies for patients with NBP-I, this review is based on a systematic search of evidence about the efficacy of treatments for each phase of the NBP-I. Fifty-seven studies were identified and reviewed. Most studies investigating the pharmacotherapy of NBP-I were methodologically limited, having observational or retrospective designs and small samples. Regarding short-term treatment, there is some limited support for the use of risperidone, valproate, and quetiapine in hypomania, and for valproate, quetiapine, fluoxetine, and venlafaxine in treating depression. For long-term treatment, the only preventive therapy for both depression and hypomania that is supported by several controlled studies is quetiapine. Lithium and fluoxetine have shown efficacy in delaying depressive recurrences. Although the adequate treatment for these patients remains to be determined, mood stabilizers and some forms of psychotherapy may be useful for these patients. We conclude that there is a paucity of sound evidence to guide clinicians in treating NBP-I patients. Although progress has been made, more quality research is needed to delineate effective treatment strategies.
    Current Psychiatry Reviews 02/2013; 9(1):41-50. DOI:10.2174/1573400511309010006
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Antidepressant safety and efficacy remain controversial for the treatment of bipolar depression. The present study utilized data from the National Institute of Mental Health Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) to examine the prevalence and clinical correlates of self-reported switch into mania/hypomania during antidepressant treatment. Antidepressant treatment histories were examined from intake assessments for the first 500 subjects enrolled into the STEP-BD between November 1999 and November 2000. Affective switch was defined as a report of mania, hypomania, or mixed episodes within the first 12 weeks of having started an antidepressant. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared for subjects with or without a history of acute switch during antidepressant treatment. Among the 338 subjects with prior antidepressant treatment and complete data on switch event outcomes, 44% reported at least 1 such occurrence. Patients with a shorter duration of illness (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.04) and a history of multiple antidepressant trials (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.38 to 2.16) were more likely to report a history of switch than other patients. A significantly increased risk for affective polarity switch was identified in patients who had ever switched to mania/hypomania while taking tricyclic antidepressants (OR = 7.80, 95% CI = 1.56 to 28.9), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (OR = 3.73, 95% CI = 1.98 to 7.05), or bupropion (OR = 4.28, 95% CI = 1.72 to 10.6). Switch was less common during treatment with electroconvulsive therapy or monoamine oxidase inhibitors than other antidepressants. Antidepressants are associated with the potential risk for treatment-emergent mania or hypomania, particularly in bipolar patients with short illness duration, multiple past antidepressant trials, and past experience of switch with at least one antidepressant.
    The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 11/2007; 68(10):1472-9. DOI:10.4088/JCP.v68n1002 · 5.14 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is widespread clinical belief that unrecognized bipolar disorder (BD) is a frequent contributor to apparent treatment resistant depression (TRD). This review attempts to assess the degree to which prevailing empirical data supports that view. All English-language articles published between January 1998 and January 2008 that focused on adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and BD bearing on the question "Is unrecognized BD a frequent contributor to apparent TRD in patients initially diagnosed with MDD?" were reviewed. 196 articles were reviewed; the preponderance of the data suggested: 1) TRD populations demonstrate high rates of hidden bipolar disorder, 2) there is not sufficient evidence to unequivocally support or reject the hypothesis that patients who relapse despite continued antidepressant treatment are likely to have bipolar spectrum disorder, 3) patients initially diagnosed with MDD do not demonstrate high rates of switching to mania or hypomania when treated with antidepressants and 4) in patients diagnosed with BD, antidepressants are not robustly effective and are poorly tolerated. The main limitation of this review is that none of the individual studies were designed to test our primary hypothesis. This review provides at least moderate support to the hypothesis that BD is a contributor to apparent TRD. Thus, clinicians treating MDD are urged to search for "soft" signs of bipolarity and to be prepared to alter diagnosis and treatment strategies accordingly.
    Journal of Affective Disorders 12/2010; 127(1-3):10-8. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2010.06.036 · 3.71 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
3 Downloads
Available from