Minimal sizes of cases with a susceptible genotype and minimal odds ratios among susceptible individuals in case-control studies.

Department of Preventive Medicine / Biostatistics and Medical Decision Making, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP (Impact Factor: 2.51). 6(2):165-9.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Disease risk elevation due to an environmental factor only for individuals with a susceptible genotype is a typical example of gene-environment interaction. In order to identify risk factors interacting with susceptible genotypes in case-control studies, presumptions on minimal size of cases with the susceptible genotype (S (min)) and odds ratio (OR) among the susceptible individuals (OR(susceptible)) are useful.
Proportion of exposed cases (P(1)) and OR for whole cases (OR(whole)) statistically detectable in a case-control study can be calculated in a conventional method. P(1) was assumed to be a weighted sum of the exposed among cases with the genotype (P(x)) and cases without the genotype (equal to proportion of the exposed among controls, P(0)), i.e., S P(x) + (1 - S) P0, where S is the size (proportion) of cases with the genotype. For each calculated P(1), S became the minimum (S(min)) in case of P(x) = 1. OR(susceptible) was calculated by {P(x) (1 - P(0))} / {(1 - P(x)) P(0)}.
S(min) and OR(susceptible) were listed for the combinations of the above components. For example, a detectable P(1) was 0.638 for P(0)=0.5 in a case-control study with 200 cases (N(1)) and 200 controls (N(0)), when a error of a two-sided test was 0.05 with an 80% of power. In case of P(1)=0.638, OR(whole) was 1.77, producing S(min) = 0.277 for infinite OR(susceptible). It indicates that an environmental factor cannot be detected in case that a high-risk genotype frequency is less than 0.277.
If the size of cases with a susceptible genotype is expected to be less than S(min), case-control studies are unlikely to detect a significant OR of the environmental factor.

1 Read
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the last decade, considerable interest has focused on sample size estimation in the design of clinical trials. The resulting literature is scattered over many textbooks and journals. This paper presents these methods in a single review and comments on their application in practice.
    Statistics in Medicine 07/1984; 3(3):199-214. DOI:10.1002/sim.4780030302 · 1.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women in Western countries, and its prevalence is also increasing in Asia. The major risk factor for breast cancer can be traced to reproductive events that influence the lifetime levels of hormones. However, a large percentage of breast cancer cases cannot, be explained by these risk factors. The identification of susceptibility factors that predispose individuals to breast cancer (for instance, if they are exposed to particular environmental agents) could possibly give further insight into the etiology of this malignancy and provide targets for the future development of therapeutics. The most interesting candidate genes include those that mediate a range of functions. These include carcinogen metabolism, DNA repair, steroid hormone metabolism, signal transduction, and cell cycle control. we conducted a hospital-based case-control study on South Korea to evaluate the potential modifying role of the genetic pollymprphisms of selected low penetrance gens that are involved carcinogen metabolisms (i.e., CYP1A1, CYP2E1, GSTM1/T1/P1, NAT1/2, etc.), estrogen synthesis and metabolism (i.e., CYP19, CYP17, CYP1B1, COMT, ER-alpha, etc.), DNA repair (i.e., XRCC1/3, ERCC2/4, ATM, AGT, etc.), and signal transduction as well as others (i.e., TGF- beta, IGF-1, TNF- beta, IL-1B, IL-1RN, etc.). We also took into account the potential interaction between these and the known risk factors of breast cancer. The results of selected genes will be presented in this mini-review.
    Journal of biochemistry and molecular biology 02/2003; 36(1):28-34. DOI:10.5483/BMBRep.2003.36.1.028 · 2.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The detection of gene-environment interaction can provide important clues not only for resolving biological mechanisms underlying diseases, but also for disease prevention. The newly introduced case-only study was compared with traditional case-control study in terms of statistical power to detect significant gene-environment interaction. Odds ratios for interaction were calculated in the framework of case-control study and case-only study separately, by an unconditional logistic model. Hypothetical data with 200 cases and 200 or 400 controls and real published data derived from four cancer case-control studies of genotype and smoking were used for the comparisons. Although odds ratio estimates for interaction were the same, 95% confidence intervals were narrower in case-only studies than in case-control studies. Similarly, there were no substantial differences in point estimates for interaction in four real cancer case-control studies between the two study designs, but the confidence intervals were narrower with the case-only study. Although the case-only study does not provide odds ratios for exposure or genotype alone, it is very useful for the detection of interaction, especially for screening purposes.
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 11/1999; 29(10):490-3. DOI:10.1093/jjco/29.10.490 · 2.02 Impact Factor


1 Read
Available from