The impact of overtime and long work hours on occupational injuries and illnesses: new evidence from the United States.

Center for Health Policy & Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA 01545, USA.
Occupational and environmental medicine (Impact Factor: 3.23). 10/2005; 62(9):588-97. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2004.016667
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To analyse the impact of overtime and extended working hours on the risk of occupational injuries and illnesses among a nationally representative sample of working adults from the United States.
Responses from 10,793 Americans participating in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) were used to evaluate workers' job histories, work schedules, and occurrence of occupational injury and illness between 1987 and 2000. A total of 110,236 job records were analysed, encompassing 89,729 person-years of accumulated working time. Aggregated incidence rates in each of five exposure categories were calculated for each NLSY survey period. Multivariate analytical techniques were used to estimate the relative risk of long working hours per day, extended hours per week, long commute times, and overtime schedules on reporting a work related injury or illness, after adjusting for age, gender, occupation, industry, and region.
After adjusting for those factors, working in jobs with overtime schedules was associated with a 61% higher injury hazard rate compared to jobs without overtime. Working at least 12 hours per day was associated with a 37% increased hazard rate and working at least 60 hours per week was associated with a 23% increased hazard rate. A strong dose-response effect was observed, with the injury rate (per 100 accumulated worker-years in a particular schedule) increasing in correspondence to the number of hours per day (or per week) in the workers' customary schedule.
Results suggest that job schedules with long working hours are not more risky merely because they are concentrated in inherently hazardous industries or occupations, or because people working long hours spend more total time "at risk" for a work injury. Strategies to prevent work injuries should consider changes in scheduling practices, job redesign, and health protection programmes for people working in jobs involving overtime and extended hours.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The goal of the paper was to discover, if knowledge workers' occupational threats can be linked to some logical constructs and if knowledge workers can be grouped into some logical items concerning their assessment of these threats and attitudes to character of work. On a basis of literature studies peculiarity of knowledge-based work and specific occupational threats were identified. They were examined as observable variables with the use of a questionnaire method on a sample of 500 knowledge workers. Then, variables were classified using multidimensional exploratory technique - cluster analysis. As a research implication, the structure of perception of knowledge workers' occupational threats and their attitudes to character of work were revealed. As a practical implication, a proposed classification of variables allows to measure perception of occupational threats and use the results e. g. when designing trainings on occupational health and safety and to better fit them to this specific group of employees. Thus, job safety can be effectively improved by raising awareness of certain threats. The paper's contribution is a novel way of measuring and classifying knowledge workers' occupational threats and attitudes to character of work.
    Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 01/2015; 17(1):80-89. DOI:10.17531/ein.2015.1.11 · 0.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective. To assess the occupational health hazards faced by healthcare workers and the mitigation measures. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional study utilizing quantitative data collection methods among 200 respondents who worked in 8 major health facilities in Kampala. Results. Overall, 50.0% of respondents reported experiencing an occupational health hazard. Among these, 39.5% experienced biological hazards while 31.5% experienced nonbiological hazards. Predictors for experiencing hazards included not wearing the necessary personal protective equipment (PPE), working overtime, job related pressures, and working in multiple health facilities. Control measures to mitigate hazards were availing separate areas and containers to store medical waste and provision of safety tools and equipment. Conclusion. Healthcare workers in this setting experience several hazards in their workplaces. Associated factors include not wearing all necessary protective equipment, working overtime, experiencing work related pressures, and working in multiple facilities. Interventions should be instituted to mitigate the hazards. Specifically PPE supply gaps, job related pressures, and complacence in adhering to mitigation measures should be addressed.
    Journal of Environmental and Public Health 01/2015;
  • Source
    Handbook of Rational Choice Social Research., Edited by R. Wittek, T.A.B. Snijders, and V. Nee, 01/2013: chapter Social rationality, self-regulation and well-being: The regulatory significance of needs, goals, and the self: pages 72-112; Stanford: Stanford University Press.


Available from