The Academic Radiologist’s Clinical Productivity

Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628, USA.
Academic Radiology (Impact Factor: 1.75). 10/2005; 12(9):1211-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.05.015
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this project was to further understand the academic radiologist's clinical workload with comparison to the prior studies in the past decade. This updated data is very important in determining faculty staffing requirements.
A survey performed by the Society of Chairmen of Academic Radiology Departments (SCARD) collected data in 2003 for radiologists in 23 departments. This data included Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes by radiologist. The CPT codes were converted into relative value units (RVUs) per full-time equivalent (FTE) faculty. By grouping the CPT codes into similar examination categories, adjustment factors were created for the RVU values for each CPT in order to compensate for workload variations. These adjustment factors are identical to the adjustments made in 2001 except for a new factor for nuclear medicine.
Overall, the average clinical workload in 2003 was 5,872 RVU/FTE, a 32% increase compared to 4,458 RVU/FTE in 1998 and 55% increase compared to 3,790 RVU/FTE in 1996. The average number of examinations per FTE had a smaller (17%) increase since 1998. The adjustment factors remain very similar to those presented in 2001. The only change was a new adjustment factor of 1.3 for nuclear medicine.
Clinical workload as measured by RVU/FTE and adjusted RVU/FTE are very useful for determining optimal staffing in subspecialty sections and in the department as a whole. The workload continues to increase, but more in examination complexity than in numbers of procedures overall.

7 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare financial productivity and employment costs of full-time and part-time faculty members and to assess qualitative factors related to part-time employment. Financial productivity and employment costs were compared for full-time and part-time staff members on the basis of a review of financial records from fiscal year 2005. Part-time and full-time faculty members were interviewed to determine reasons for working part-time and to assess the attitudes of both full-time and part-time faculty members toward part-time status. Part-time radiologists working an average 65% schedule constituted 13% of the total full-time equivalent faculty complement and performed 14% of the clinical work at an average of 0.88 physicians' component total relative value units while more than covering their costs. Part-time radiologists were more productive while interpreting examinations of lesser relative value unit value than full-time radiologists. Part-time radiologists are an important resource for the specialty and should be nurtured to stay in practice.
    Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR 06/2006; 3(5):335-9. DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2006.01.010 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the past decade, there have been many developments that have changed the practice of radiology and the education of radiology residents. These include workforce issues, the institution of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hours restrictions, the increased use of night float systems, and the implementation of picture archiving and communication systems as well as voice recognition. This article reviews the impact on resident education, summarizes potential problems introduced by these changes, and examines proposed solutions.
    Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR 08/2006; 3(7):528-33. DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2006.02.011 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was a quantitative analysis for the influence of physician's assistants on national health insurance revenue and number of patients in clinic. The data was derived from the Korean national health insurance. That was complete enumeration. Dependent variables were measured by national health insurance revenue and number of patients. Independent variables were reported physician's assistants that the number of nurse, nurse-aid, technologist of clinical laboratory, physical therapist and radiologist in clinic. Confounding variables were classified by demand(region, number of inhabitants, number of clinics, number of bed per a hundred thousand persons) and supply(sex and age of representative, number of bed, subjective of medical treatment). On the multiple regression analyses, the physician's assistants that nurse, nurse-aid, technologist of clinical laboratory and physical therapist were statistically significant for outputs. But radiologist was statistically significant only for number of patient.
    01/2007; 17(2). DOI:10.4332/KJHPA.2007.17.2.018
Show more