Laga AC, Zander DS, Cagle PTPrognostic significance of cyclooxygenase 2 expression in 259 cases of non-small cell lung cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 129: 1113-1117
Previous studies report that increased expression of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) correlates with poor clinical outcome in several malignancies, including non- small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors have been reported to effectively inhibit carcinogenesis in colon cancer experimental models.
We examined COX-2 expression in 259 cases of NSCLC to evaluate its prognostic significance.
Sections of NSCLC from patients with a median 5-year follow-up were immunostained with COX-2 monoclonal antibody (1:150) using the Dako mouse EnVision;pl system. Extent of COX-2 expression in neoplastic cells was recorded as follows: 0, 0% to 10% of cells positive; 1, 11% to 33% positive; 2, 34% to 66% positive; and 3, more than 66% positive. Intensity was scored as either increased (+) or not increased (-), compared to internal control smooth muscle and endothelial cells. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the relationship between survival and COX-2 expression, using the log-rank test for statistical significance.
No relationship was found between the extent and/or the intensity of COX-2 expression and patient survival when the entire cohort was considered. However, when separately analyzed according to disease stage and intensity of COX-2 expression, a significant relationship (P = .03) between increased COX-2 expression and shortened patient survival was found only in patients with stage I and II NSCLC.
To our knowledge, this is the largest series of NSCLCs in which COX-2 has been investigated as a prognostic marker. The findings in this large series support previous studies of smaller cohorts that reported that increased COX-2 expression predicts poor outcome in patients with early-stage NSCLC.
Available from: Shashi Prakash Mishra
- "Our result is concordant with previous literature demonstrating the over-expression of COX-2 (Murata H et al. 1999) (Fig. 1b, 5a). Our results demonstrate that the expression of COX-2 increase with advancement of tumor stage which is also concordant with previous report (Khunamornpong et al. 2009; Laga et al. 2005) (Fig. 1b, 5a). H. pylori infection is one of the important factors for the Gastric Carcinoma. "
International Journal of Advanced Research 02/2014;
Available from: PubMed Central
- "Although COX-2 expression was also found higher in female patients, patients with ages≤60 years, non-smokers, moderate and well differentiated tumors, nodal metastasis, and in stages III-IV, the difference had no statistical significance. Studies examining the relationship between COX-2 tumor expression and survival among lung cancer patients were inconsistent, with reports of an inverse relationship with survival , no association , or a direct association with survival . In our study, there was no correlation between COX-2 expression and patient's overall survival. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the expression of EGFR and COX-2 and their correlation with prognosis in NSCLC METHODS: The paraffin embedded tumor samples of 50 NSCLC patients receiving radical resection were analyzed immunohistochemically for EGFR and COX-2 expression and their prognostic values were explored.
The positive rate of EGFR protein in NSCLC tumor cells was 46%, which was significantly higher than its expression in normal lung (p = 0.0234) and paracancerous tissues (p = 0.020). EGFR expression was significantly higher in nodal positive than in nodal negative patients (p = 0.04). The mean survival time for EGFR positive patients (31 months) was significantly lower than that for patients with EGFR negative expression (48 months) (p = 0.008,). In patients receiving post-operation thoracic irradiation, the mean survival time for EGFR positive patients was significantly lower than that for patients without EGFR positive expression (25 vs. 48 months, P = 0.004). The positive rate of COX-2 protein expression in NSCLC tumor cells was 90%, which was significantly higher than that in normal tissue(p = 0.00) and paracancerous tissue (p = 0.00). There was no correlation between COX-2 expression and patient survival, and no correlation between COX-2 and EGFR protein expression (P = 0.555).
COX-2 and EGFR are over-expressed in NSCLC. EGFR is an independent prognostic factor and a predictive factor for radiotherapy response in NSCLC.
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 03/2011; 30(1):27. DOI:10.1186/1756-9966-30-27 · 4.43 Impact Factor
Available from: Damjan Glavac
- " 2008 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved COX-2 levels in NSCLC and their importance in lung carcinogenesis   . Over-expression of COX-2 has been proposed as a biomarker for biologically aggressive types of NSCLC and poorer survival   . "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We evaluated the occurrence of mutations in P53, K-RAS, COX-2, expression of COX-2 and hTERT and relations among clinicopathological signs. P53 mutations were identified in 34.4% of tumours, the majority of them occurring in SCC (squamous cell carcinoma, 55.6%). K-RAS was mutated in 12.2% of NSCLC tumours, the majority of the mutations being found in ADC (adenocarcinoma, 27.0%). Mutational screening detected three different COX-2 mutations and five different P53 mutations, published for the first time. With RT-PCR we observed that the expression of the tested genes, hTERT and COX-2, was highly significant for ADC (p < 0.01) and SCC (p < 0.05). Statistical analysis of the combined results revealed significant
correlation between expression of COX-2 and hTERT (p < 0.001), hTERT expression and staging (p < 0.05) and survival (p <
0.01). A positive correlation between COX-2 expression and K-RAS mutation (p <0.05) was also observed. This study provides
insight into associations between the analysed biomarkers and the clinical-pathological data of the patients.
Disease markers 10/2008; 25(2):97-106. DOI:10.1155/2008/232743 · 1.56 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.