Darnton AJ, McElvenny DM, Hodgson JTEstimating the number of asbestos-related lung cancer deaths in Great Britain from 1980 to 2000. Ann Occup Hyg 50: 29-38

Epidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, Health and Safety Executive, Magdalen House, Trinity Road, Bootle, Merseyside L20 3QZ, UK.
Annals of Occupational Hygiene (Impact Factor: 2.1). 02/2006; 50(1):29-38. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mei038
Source: PubMed


Inhalation of asbestos fibres is known to cause two main kinds of cancer-mesothelioma and lung cancer. While the vast majority of mesothelioma cases are generally accepted as being caused by asbestos, the proportion of asbestos-related lung cancers is less clear and cannot be determined directly because cases are not clinically distinguishable from those due to other causes. The aim of this study was to estimate the number of asbestos-related lung cancers among males by modelling their relative lung cancer mortality among occupations within Great Britain in terms of smoking habits, mesothelioma mortality (as an index of asbestos exposure) and occupation type (as a proxy for socio-economic factors).
Proportional mortality ratios for lung cancer and mesothelioma for the 20-year period from 1980 to 2000 (excluding 1981) were calculated for occupational groups. Smoking indicators were developed from three General Household Surveys carried out during the 1980s and 1990s. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the number of asbestos-related lung cancers by estimating the number of lung cancer deaths in each occupation assuming no asbestos exposure and subtracting this from the actual predicted number of lung cancer deaths.
The effect of asbestos exposure in predicting lung cancer mortality was weak in comparison to smoking habits and occupation type. The proportion of current smokers in occupational groups and average age at which they started smoking were particularly important factors. Our estimate of the number of asbestos-related lung cancers was between two-thirds and one death for every mesothelioma death: equivalent to between 11 500 and 16 500 deaths during the time period studied.
Asbestos-related lung cancer is likely to have accounted for 2-3% of all lung cancer deaths among males in Great Britain over the last two decades of the 20th century. Asbestos-related lung cancers are likely to remain an important component of the total number of lung cancer deaths in the future as part of the legacy of past asbestos exposures in occupational settings.

Download full-text


Available from: Damien Mcelvenny, Jul 14, 2014
25 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although the asbestos application is band in most developed countries but it is still used in many developing countries, escalating the mortality rate due to cancer among the workers exposed to asbestos fibers. In the present work, occupational exposure to airborne asbestos fibers in production line of an asbestos-cement products manufacturing factory were assessed, using OSHA method ID-160. For this purpose, 106 personal air samples were collected from breathing zones of workers in various processes of the factory. Cancer-related mortalities were also predicted by extrapolation of OSHA risk assessment data to the data obtained from the factory in question. The results revealed that physically disturbing processes such as mills, drilling and cutting are the most deadly processes. It was also shown that mills have the highest mortality rate due to asbestos fibers exposure, expecting 1198 deaths per 100,000 workers after one year exposure and 14665 deaths per 100,000 workers after 20 years occupational exposure. Relative risk (RR) of lung cancer after 1, 20 and 45 years working in the factory in question versus public community of Iran would be 11.6, 206.5 and 324, respectively. Cancer-related mortality predicted for dry cutting process was more than wet cutting process(RR=3.6). Finally it was recommended that job rotation and isolation of high risk operations could lead to lower cancer-related mortality due to occupational exposure to asbestos airborne fibers.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The U.K. authorities are failing to acknowledge or deal effectively with an epidemic of work-related cancers. The government's Health and Safety Executive (HSE) underestimates the exposed population, the risks faced as a result of those exposures, and the potential for pre- vention. The HSE fails to acknowledge the social inequality in occupational cancer risk, which is con- centrated in manual workers and lower employment grades, or the greater likelihood these groups will experience multiple exposures to work-related carcino- gens. It continues to neglect the largely uninvestigated and unprioritized risk to women and currently has nei- ther a requirement nor a strategy for reducing the numbers and volumes of cancer-causing substances, processes, and environments at work. The result is that the U.K. faces at least 20,000 and possibly in excess of 40,000 new cases of work-related cancer every year, leading to thousands of deaths and an annual cost to the economy of between £29.5bn and £59bn. This paper outlines flaws in the HSE's approach and makes recommendations to address effectively the U.K.'s occupational cancer crisis. Key words: occupational cancer; Health and Safety Executive; United Kingdom; public health; policy. INT J OCCUP ENVIRON HEALTH 2007;13:432-440
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Up to 20 000 asbestos-related lung cancers and 10 000 mesotheliomas occur annually in Western Europe, Scandinavia, North America, Japan and Australia. The mesothelioma incidence ranges from 14 to 45 with a mean of 22 cases/million/year in the whole population (over 15 years of age). In the 1970's these industrialized countries had used asbestos 2.0 to 5.5 kg/capita/year. Most mesothelioma deaths are registered among construction and shipbuilding workers. In addition, about 5% of all lung cancers can be attributed to occupational exposure to asbestos. Although mesotheliomas are usually diagnosed as occupational diseases, only few countries recognize asbestos-related lung cancers in legislation or compensation practice. No reliable data are available from Eastern Europe or developing countries of Asia, Africa or South America.
Show more