Article

The volume-outcome relationship: Don't believe everything you see

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
World Journal of Surgery (Impact Factor: 2.35). 11/2005; 29(10):1241-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7993-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper investigates methodological limitations of the volume-outcome relationship. A brief overview of quality measurement is followed by a discussion of two important aspects of the relationship.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
134 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a very complex urologic procedure. Despite improvements in practice, technique and process of care, it is still associated with significant complications, including death, with reported postoperative mortality rates ranging from 0.8% to 8%. We examine the quality of surgical care indicators and document the mortality rates at 30, 60 and 90 days after RC across Quebec.
    07/2014; 8(7-8):259-67. DOI:10.5489/cuaj.1997
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Legally mandated minimum hospital caseload requirements for certain invasive procedures, including pancreatectomy, esophagectomy, and some types of organ transplantation, have been in effect in Germany since 2004. The goal of such requirements is to improve patient care by ensuring that patients undergo certain procedures only in hospitals that have met the corresponding minimum caseload requirement. We used the case numbers published in legally mandated hospital quality control reports to determine whether the hospitals actually met the stipulated requirements.
    Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 08/2014; 111(33-34):549-55. DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2014.0549 · 3.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe the relationships between procedure volume and late survival after cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and explore variables explaining any effect. Electronic records of treatment and surgical pathology reports were linked to a population-based registry to identify patients who underwent cystectomy during 1994-2008 in Ontario, Canada. Explanatory variables included adjuvant chemotherapy, lymph node dissection (LND), and margin status. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to explore associations between volume and cancer-specific survival (CSS) as well as overall survival. The cohort included 2802 MIBC patients treated with cystectomy. High-volume hospitals were more likely to have used adjuvant chemotherapy (25% vs 18%; P <.001), more likely to have performed an LND (83% vs 53%; P <.001), and associated with a lower 90-day mortality (6% vs 10%; P = .032). Low-volume hospitals had a lower 5-year CSS rate of 32% (28%-36%) compared with those of high-volume centers at 38% (33%-42%). Individual surgeon volume was similarly associated with both early- and long-term outcomes. In multivariate analysis, both surgeon and hospital volumes were associated with CSS and overall survival. The surgeon volume effect on long-term outcomes was modestly modified by indicators of the quality of the LND, with little effect of the other explanatory variables. Higher provider volume is associated with higher CSS in patients with MIBC in the general population. The volume effect was modestly mediated by the quality of LND. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Urology 10/2014; 84(5). DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.070 · 2.13 Impact Factor