Neurophysiological Indexes of Speech Processing Deficits in Children with Specific Language Impairment
Program in Hearing Sciences, City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, USA. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
(Impact Factor: 4.09).
08/2005; 17(7):1168-80. DOI: 10.1162/0898929054475217
We used neurophysiological and behavioral measures to examine whether children with specific language impairment (SLI) have deficits in automatic processing of brief, phonetically similar vowels, and whether attention plays a role in such deficits. The neurophysiological measure mismatch negativity (MMN) was used as an index of discrimination in two tasks; one in which children ignored the auditory stimuli and watched a silent video and a second in which they attended to the auditory modality. Children with SLI showed good behavioral discrimination, but significantly poorer behavioral identification of the brief vowels than the children with typical language development (TLD). For the TLD children, two neurophysiological measures (MMN and a later negativity, LN) indexed discrimination of the vowels in both tasks. In contrast, only the LN was elicited in either task for the SLI group. We did not see a direct correspondence between the absence of MMN and poor behavioral performance in the children with SLI. This pattern of findings indicates that children with SLI have speech perception deficiencies, although the underlying cause may vary.
Available from: Miwako Hisagi
- "One drawback of studies that examine speech processing in these classic, preattentive oddball paradigms is that isolated speech contrasts are repeated multiple times, and, thus, constitute an unnatural context. A different pattern might be found for more natural speech, although we have demonstrated that these vowel stimuli can be categorized by native listeners and are sensitive to language status (typical or impaired) in earlier studies (Datta et al., 2010; Shafer et al., 2005, 2007). The resynthesized nature of the vowel stimuli could also have led to listeners processing them as non-speech sounds. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study examined behavioral and neurophysiological indices of discrimination of an English vowel contrast [ɪ–ɛ] by early and late bilingual Spanish–English speakers, compared to monolingual English speakers. Electrophysiological measures (Mismatched Negativity – MMN) and behavioral measures (AX discrimination and forced-choice identification) were employed to examine perception of a nine-step vowel continuum, re-synthesized from natural tokens. Results revealed that (i) both monolingual and early bilinguals showed similar behavioral perception while late bilinguals performed more poorly on all behavioral tasks; and (ii) monolinguals showed robust evidence of discrimination (MMN) at a pre-attentive level that was significantly larger than found for either early or late bilinguals. These findings suggested that early input of English vowels to bilinguals did not necessarily lead to robust, automatic processing, as measured at a more attention-independent neural level; but earlier experience with a second language allowed for native-like speech perception measured with behavioral tasks.
Bilingualism 06/2014; DOI:10.1017/S1366728914000170 · 1.71 Impact Factor
Available from: Elyse Sussman
- "Reduced amplitude MMN is generally thought to reflect poorer representations of the phonetic categories within the speaker's native language, which may be the result of poor auditory resolution or poor language-specific learning of relevant phonetic cues (e.g., Shafer et al. 2005; Datta et al. 2010). One study of 6-year-old children at risk for dyslexia, in addition to reduced MMN to phonemic contrasts (e.g., / ba/ vs. /da/) observed larger MMN to a within-category difference (allophonic variants of /ba/) in the at-risk children compared to the matched controls (Noordenbos et al. 2012). "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Cognition is often affected in a variety of neuropsychiatric, neurological, and neurodevelopmental disorders. The neural discriminative response, reflected in mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetoencephalographic equivalent (MMNm), has been used as a tool to study a variety of disorders involving auditory cognition. MMN/MMNm is an involuntary brain response to auditory change or, more generally, to pattern regularity violation. For a number of disorders, MMN/MMNm amplitude to sound deviance has been shown to be attenuated or the peak-latency of the component prolonged compared to controls. This general finding suggests that while not serving as a specific marker to any particular disorder, MMN may be useful for understanding factors of cognition in various disorders, and has potential to serve as an indicator of risk. This review presents a brief history of the MMN, followed by a description of how MMN has been used to index auditory processing capability in a range of neuropsychiatric, neurological, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Finally, we suggest future directions for research to further enhance our understanding of the neural substrate of deviance detection that could lead to improvements in the use of MMN as a clinical tool.
Brain Topography 05/2014; 27(4). DOI:10.1007/s10548-014-0374-6 · 3.47 Impact Factor
Available from: sciencedirect.com
- "Conversely, for the PMN and N400, we compared responses to certain types of mismatches (cohorts versus rhymes) in order to elucidate whether these two groups might show differences in phonemic and lexical processing. This was based on evidence from prior studies that these groups show differences in processing consonants (Sussman, 1993; Burlingame et al., 2005) and vowels (Shafer et al., 2005) as well as differential sensitivity to onset versus rhyme similarity (Gray et al., 2012; Seiger- Gardner and Brooks, 2008; Shafer et al., 2004). Taken together, analysis of these three components offered us an opportunity to tease apart the component processes underlying deficits in spoken word recognition in SLI. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to compare auditory word recognition in children with specific language impairment (SLI group; N=14) to a group of typically developing children (TD group; N=14). Subjects were presented with pictures of items and heard auditory words that either matched or mismatched the pictures. Mismatches overlapped expected words in word-onset (cohort mismatches; see: DOLL, hear: dog), rhyme (CONE -bone), or were unrelated (SHELL -mug). In match trials, the SLI group showed a different pattern of N100 responses to auditory stimuli compared to the TD group, indicative of early auditory processing differences in SLI. However, the phonological mapping negativity (PMN) response to mismatching items was comparable across groups, suggesting that just like TD children, children with SLI are capable of establishing phonological expectations and detecting violations of these expectations in an online fashion. Perhaps most importantly, we observed a lack of attenuation of the N400 for rhyming words in the SLI group, which suggests that either these children were not as sensitive to rhyme similarity as their typically developing peers, or did not suppress lexical alternatives to the same extent. These findings help shed light on the underlying deficits responsible for SLI.
03/2013; 5C:134-148. DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2013.02.005
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.