Variation in Orthopaedic Surgeons' Perceptions About the Indications for Rotator Cuff Surgery

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, United States
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (Impact Factor: 5.28). 10/2005; 87(9):1978-84. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02944
Source: PubMed


Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated substantial variations in per capita rates of many surgical procedures, including rotator cuff repair. The purpose of the current study was to characterize orthopaedic surgeons' attitudes concerning medical decision-making about rotator cuff surgery and to investigate the associations between these beliefs and reported surgical volumes.
A survey was mailed to randomly selected orthopaedic surgeons listed in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons directory. Only individuals who had treated patients for a rotator cuff tear, or had referred patients for such treatment, within the previous year were asked to complete the two-page survey. The survey comprised fifteen questions regarding clinical opinion, including four regarding hypothetical cases. Clinical agreement was defined as >80% of the respondents answering similarly.
Of the 1100 surveys that were mailed, 539 were returned (a response rate of 49%). Of the 539 respondents, 316 (58.6%) had treated or referred patients with a rotator cuff tear in the previous year. There was a significant negative correlation between the surgeon's estimation of the failure rate of cuff repairs in the United States and that surgeon's procedure volume (r = -0.21, p = 0.0003), indicating that surgeons with a lower procedure volume are more pessimistic about the results of surgery than are those with a higher procedure volume. Arthroscopic, mini-open, and open cuff repairs were preferred by 14.5%, 46.2%, and 36.6% of the respondents, respectively. Surgeons who performed a higher volume of procedures were less likely to perform open surgery (p < 0.0001). There was clinical agreement regarding only four of the nine clinical questions and none of the four questions about the hypothetical vignettes.
We found significant variation in surgical decision-making and a lack of clinical agreement among orthopaedic surgeons about rotator cuff surgery. There was a positive correlation between the volume of procedures performed by the surgeon and the surgeon's perception of outcome, with surgeons who had a higher procedure volume being more enthusiastic about rotator cuff surgery than those who had a lower procedure volume.

Download full-text


Available from: Stephen Leonard Lyman, Apr 20, 2015
46 Reads
  • Source
    • "The earliest published description of a rotator cuff tear was by Alexander Munro some 220 years ago in 1788, describing a “hole with ragged edges in the capsular ligament of the humerus” [1]. Since this description there has been little agreement amongst orthopaedic surgeons regarding the exact indications for surgical repair of a torn degenerative rotator cuff [2]. The purpose of this review was to present an overview of degenerative rotator cuff tears and a suggested management protocol based upon current evidence. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this review was to present an over view of degenerative rotator cuff tears and a suggested management protocol based upon current evidence. Degenerative rotator cuff tears are common and are a major cause of pain and shoulder dysfunction. The management of these tears is controversial, as to whether they should be managed non-operatively or operatively. In addition when operative intervention is undertaken, there is question as to what technique of repair should be used. This review describes the epidemiology and natural history of degenerative rotator cuff tears. The management options, and the evidence to support these, are reviewed. We also present our preferred management protocol and method, if applicable, for surgical fixation of degenerative rotator cuff tears.
    Sports Medicine Arthroscopy Rehabilitation Therapy & Technology 12/2012; 4(1):48. DOI:10.1186/1758-2555-4-48
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introducción: Para identificar si existe o no discrepancia entre los médicos de equipo de fútbol en decisiones a pie de campo, se realiza una encuesta sobre casos clínicos comunes. Material y método: Durante la reunión anual de la Asociación Española de Médicos de Equipos de Fútbol se realizó una encuesta individual y anónima sobre 7 supuestos médicos de asistencia inmediata en el terreno de juego. Los casos hacían referencia a episodios reales que obligan a una toma de decisión rápida. Resultados: Los encuestados valoran reducir la luxación en vestuario con un máximo de 2 intentos y retirar al jugador. En cuanto al traumatismo torácico y el esguince del ligamento lateral externo del tobillo de grado II, la mayoría recomienda la retirada y no realizar infiltraciones. En una elongación de isquiotibiales, la mitad de los encuestados tendría en cuenta las sensaciones del jugador. En una contusión craneal con desorientación transitoria, la mayoría de médicos no retiraría al jugador. Ante una herida contusa en la cabeza, se prefieren las grapas a los puntos y realizar la sutura en el vestuario. En la parada cardiorrespiratoria, la mayoría de los médicos propone iniciar las maniobras de reanimación cardiopulmonar inmediatamente en el terreno de juego. Discusión: Los resultados obtenidos tienen diferente grado de disparidad, por lo que se anima a las distintas asociaciones médicas de nuestro ámbito a que elaboren protocolos y consensos acerca de las acciones que se deben tomar. Predominan, no obstante, las actitudes conservadoras y preservadoras de la salud del futbolista.
    Apunts Medicine de l'Esport 01/2006; 41(152). DOI:10.1016/S1886-6581(06)70026-3
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The use of subacromial corticosteroid injection (CSI) to treat rotator cuff tendinopathy is controversial. We hypothesized that characteristics such as activity level, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, duration of symptoms, and status of the rotator cuff may be prognostic factors for resolution of symptoms postinjection. Methods During a 12-month period, consecutive patients with rotator cuff disease were analyzed. Patients received subacromial CSI, oral NSAIDs, and physical therapy. Baseline ASES score, simple shoulder test, an activity scale, and demographic data were recorded. Patients who remained symptomatic and were indicated for surgery were considered failures. Patients that did not undergo surgery were reassessed after a minimum of 1 year. Results Forty-nine patients met our criteria. Follow-up was obtained for 81.6%. Sixteen cases (40%) failed conservative treatment at final follow-up (22.4 ± 11 months). CSI were successful in 76.2% of males and 45% of females (p = 0.04). Full-thickness tears were present in 8% of the patients with symptom resolution and 25% of those that failed conservative treatment (p = 0.29). No significant difference was found in age, hand dominance, duration of symptoms, or any of the scoring systems. Conclusion It is difficult to predict outcomes after CSI. Our treatment strategy showed a 40% failure rate.
    HSS Journal 02/2013; 9(1). DOI:10.1007/s11420-012-9316-6
Show more