Article

What's an integrationist? A study of self-identified integrative and (occasionally) eclectic psychologists.

Department of Psychology, University of Scranton, Scranton, PA 18510-4596, USA.
Journal of Clinical Psychology (Impact Factor: 2.12). 01/2006; 61(12):1587-94. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20203
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We examined the views and practices of self-identified eclectic and integrative psychologists, particularly in the context of historical changes since 1977 and 1988. Results from 187 eclectic clinical psychologists indicated that 50% previously adhered to another theoretical orientation, the majority preferred the term integrative to eclectic, and 85% conceptualized eclecticism/integration as the endorsement of a broader orientation. The most common paths toward integration were theoretical integration, common factors, and assimilative integration, as opposed to technical eclecticism. The most frequent theoretical contributor to integrative practice was cognitive therapy.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
106 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, an approach to clinical supervision, entitled the Contextual-Functional Meta-Framework (CFM), is developed and articulated, based on a consideration of current literature and the author’s extensive practice experience. First, the context for the development of the CFM, and its formative influences, are examined, followed by a review of its six main components: the administrative context in which supervision takes place; the culture infused supervisory working alliance; nine supervisory functions; the supervisor’s and supervisee’s theory of change; the service delivery system; and the phase of counsellor development. Finally, future avenues for the model’s ongoing development and evaluation are discussed. As a meta-framework for the development of one’s personal approach to supervision, rather than a model of supervision, the CFM provides a transtheoretical heuristic for clinical supervisors to develop their personal approach the supervision.
    International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling 06/2012; 35(2).
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Progress monitoring (PM) consists of using standardized measure to follow client progress and give clinicians feedback about response to treatment. PM systems have shown great promise in helping therapists identify when clients are not progressing, which improves both retention and client outcomes, but only if therapists use them. This article traces the story of the author's halting and sceptical adoption of PM and the questions that were raised along the way. Beginning at the point of seeing PM as a good thing for others, the author presents a series of questions that centre around the issue of how PM fits with a therapeutic philosophy that values conversation over numbers. Case vignettes illustrate some of the challenges and things learned along the way. Rather than diminishing the importance of therapeutic conversation as a vehicle for change, PM data have opened up new conversations and presented opportunities to broaden and deepen therapy sessions. The author suggests that working with a new kind of data in practice has developed her identity as a scientist–practitioner and increased her appreciation of how practitioners can contribute to the development of knowledge in our field.
    Canadian Psychology-psychologie Canadienne - CAN PSYCHOL-PSYCHOL CAN. 01/2012; 53(2):75-81.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A busca por tratamentos com base empírica para o jogo patológico está em sua infância, havendo relativamente poucos ensaios clínicos e uma ausência de estudos naturalísticos. A adesão dos jogadores ao tratamento tem sido um problema, sendo que o tratamento cognitivo-comportamental e os estudos farmacoterápicos relatam índices particularmente altos de aban-dono. As abordagens psicodinâmicas, com sua ênfase na relação terapêutica e no significado dos comportamentos autodestrutivos e aparentemente irracionais, e nos obstáculos à capacidade de se perdoar, poderiam melhorar o desfecho. Método: Após uma descrição da psicoterapia psicodinâmica, foi feita uma revisão da literatura que investigou a eficácia de tratamentos psicoterápicos de curto e longo prazo para uma série de transtornos. Com relação ao jogo patológico, foi feito um resumo da literatura psicana-lítica inicial (1914-1970) e a seguir foi revisada a literatura mais recente sobre a utilização da psicoterapia psicodinâmica no jogo patológico. Resultados: A pesquisa da literatura recente sobre psicoterapia psicodinâmica não revelou nenhum estudo contro-lado aleatorizado sobre a eficácia ou efetividade desse tratamento. No entanto, há oito estudos com desfechos positivos descritos como ecléticos multimodais; a metade destes parece utilizar abordagens psicodinâmicas. São descritos dois programas entre os que obtiveram maior êxito. Conclusões: Uma observação sobre os desfechos mais gerais da psicoterapia psicodinâmica na literatura demonstra eficácia suficiente para uma variedade de transtornos que justificam um ensaio clínico sobre o jogo patoló-gico. A psicoterapia psicodinâmica de curto prazo, com seu foco em questões nucleares, pode ser particularmente aplicável à necessidade dos jogadores patológicos de evitar ou escapar de efeitos e problemas intoleráveis. Terapias de mais longo prazo podem ser necessárias para modificar um padrão evitativo de comportamento e defesas psicodinâmicas. Descritores: Jogo patológico; Psicoterapia psicodinâmica; Terapia combinada; Formulação dinâmica; Resultado de tratamento A b s t r a c t Objective: The search for empirically based treatments for pathological gambling is in its infancy, with relatively few clinical trials and an absence of naturalistic studies. Treatment retention of gamblers has been a problem; cognitive-behavioral treatment and pharmacotherapy studies report especially high dropout rates. Psychodynamic approaches, with their emphasis on the therapeutic relationship, and the meaning of the patient's self-destructive and seemingly irrational behaviors, and on obstacles to self-forgiveness, might improve outcome. Method: After a description of psychodynamic psychotherapy, the literature on both short-term and longer therapies is reviewed regarding their efficacy for a variety of disorders. With regard to pathological gambling, the author summarizes the early (1914-1970) psychoanalytic literature then reviews the more recent psychodynamic psychotherapy literature on pathological gambling. Results: A review of the recent psychodynamic psychotherapy literature on pathological gambling failed to disclose a single randomized controlled study of treatment efficacy or effectiveness. However, there are eight positive outcome studies described as multi-modal eclectic; half of those seem to utilize psychodynamic approaches. Two of the more successful programs are described. Conclusions: A review of the outcomes literature for psychodynamic psychotherapy demonstrates efficacy for a variety of disorders sufficient to justify a clinical trial for pathological gambling. Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy, with its focus on core issues, may be particularly applicable to the pathological gambler's need to avoid or escape intolerable affects and problems. Longer therapies may be needed to modify an avoidant coping style and defenses.

Full-text

Download
358 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014