Hormonal influences on the muscle-bone feedback system: a perspective.

Bone Research Group, UKK Institute, Tampere, Finland.
Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions (Impact Factor: 2.4). 5(3):255-61.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Hormones, muscle and bone tissues have co-existed virtually during the whole evolution of vertebrates, and it is obvious that they constitute a complex system able to cope with needs and challenges arising from a variety of physiological and locomotive needs. All body movements are produced by co-ordinated contractions of skeletal muscles, while consequent dynamic muscle work provides the fundamental source of mechanical loading to the skeleton. Mechanical competence of the skeleton is principally maintained by a mechanosensory feedback system that senses the loading-induced deformations within the bones and maintains the skeletal rigidity through structural adaptation. In contrast to the prevalent view suggesting a modulatory effect of hormones on the sensitivity of the mechanosensory system, a new conceptual scheme is proposed. In particular, it is argued that the mechanical and hormonal functions in the skeleton are fundamentally independent but can be seemingly interactive through hormonally-induced modifications in the bone structure, those basically forming a mineral reservoir for maintenance of physiological homeostasis. Whenever needed, utilization of this strategically placed reservoir would not essentially compromise the mechanical competence and locomotive capability of the skeleton. Although plausible, the present view is necessarily speculative and awaits corroborative experimental evidence.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While tennis playing results in large bone strength benefits in the racquet arm of young players, the effects of tennis playing in old players have not been investigated. Large side asymmetries in bone strength were found in veteran players, which were more pronounced in men, younger players and childhood starters. Regular tennis results in large racquet arm bone and muscle strength advantages; however, these effects have not been studied in old players. The non-racquet arm can act as an internal control for the exercising racquet arm without confounding factors, e.g. genotype. Therefore, veteran tennis player side asymmetries were examined to investigate age, sex and starting age effects on bone exercise benefits. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) scans were taken at the radius, ulna and humerus mid-shaft and distal radius in both arms of 88 tennis players (51 males, 37 females; mean age 63.8 ± 11.8 years). Thirty-two players began playing in adulthood, thereby termed 'old starters'; players were otherwise termed 'young starters'. Muscle size and bone strength were greater in the racquet arm; notably, distal radius bone mineral content (BMC) was 13 ± 10 % higher and humeral bone area 23 ± 12 % larger (both P < 0.001). Epiphyseal BMC asymmetry was not affected by age (P = 0.863) or sex (P = 0.954), but diaphyseal asymmetries were less pronounced in older players and women, particularly in the humerus where BMC, area and moment of resistance asymmetries were 28-34 % less in women (P < 0.01). Bone area and periosteal circumference asymmetries were smaller in old starters (all P < 0.01); most notably, no distal radius asymmetry was found in this group (0.4 ± 3.4 %). Tennis participation is associated with large side asymmetries in muscle and bone strength in old age. Larger relative side asymmetries in men, younger players and young starters suggest a greater potential for exercise benefits to bone in these groups.
    Osteoporosis International 02/2014; 25(4). DOI:10.1007/s00198-014-2617-5 · 4.04 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The prevailing unitary model of involutional osteoporosis suggests that the female postmenopausal bone loss consists of two separate phases: the accelerated, transient phase, which is most distinct over the subsequent decade after the menopause and accounts for 20–30% of the cancellous bone loss and 5–10% of the cortical bone loss (type I osteoporosis), and the following gradual, continuous bone loss (type II osteoporosis). Estrogen deficiency is currently quite unanimously accepted as the primary cause of the type I osteoporosis, as well as also a major determinant of the type II osteoporosis, and quite logically, the quest to uncover the origin of type I (and II) osteoporosis has focused on the estrogen withdrawal-related skeletal changes at and around the menopause. However, given that the cyclical secretion of estrogen begins normally in the early adolescence and continues over the entire fertile period (excluding the potential periods of pregnancy) until the eventual cessation of female reproductive capability at menopause, one could argue that this menopause-oriented approach is limited in scope. In this communication, some classic findings of the pubertal effects of estrogen on female bones are presented, findings that Fuller Albright actually already knew when he first described the disease called postmenopausal osteoporosis in 1940. When these findings are incorporated with the primary function of the axial skeleton and long bones–the locomotion–an alternative, novel evolution-based proposal for the origin of the accelerated phase of postmenopausal bone loss and accordingly, the pathogenesis of the postmenopausal bone loss is introduced: estrogen induces the packing of mechanically excess mineral into female skeleton at puberty, a bone stock that is an apparent evolutionary safety reserve for the needs of reproduction (fetal skeletogenesis and lactation). When the female reproductive function ceases at menopause, this deposit of mineral is removed as unnecessary, serving as the origin of the type I postmenopausal osteoporosis.
    International Congress Series 06/2006; 1296:138-146. DOI:10.1016/j.ics.2006.03.040
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mechanical stimuli influence bone strength, with internal muscular forces thought to be the greatest stressors of bone. Consequently, the effects of exercise in improving and maintaining bone strength have been explored in a number of interventional studies. These studies demonstrate a positive effect of high-impact activities (i.e. where large muscle forces are produced) on bone strength, with benefits being most pronounced in interventions in early pubertal children. However, current studies have not investigated the forces acting on bones and subsequent deformation, preventing the development of optimised and targeted exercise interventions. Similarly, the effects of number and frequency of exercise repetitions and training sessions on bone accrual are unexplored. There are conflicting results as to gender effects on bone response to exercise, and the effects of age and starting age on the osteogenic effects of exercise are not well known. It also appears that exercise interventions are most effective in physically inactive people or counteracting conditions of disuse such as bed rest. Bone strength is only one com-ponent of fracture risk, and it may be that exercise resulting in improvements in, e.g., muscle force/power and/or bal-ance is more effective than those whose effects are solely osteogenic. In summary, exercise is likely to be an effec-tive tool in maintaining bone strength but current inter-ventions are far from optimal.
    Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism 12/2013; DOI:10.1007/s12018-013-9151-4


Available from
Jun 3, 2014