Hysterical conversion and brain function

Laboratory for Behavioral Neurology and Imaging of Cognition, Clinic of Neurology, University University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Progress in brain research (Impact Factor: 5.1). 02/2005; 150:309-29. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50023-2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Hysterical conversion disorders represent "functional" or unexplained neurological deficits such as paralysis or somatosensory losses that are not explained by organic lesions in the nervous system, but arise in the context of "psychogenic" stress or emotional conflicts. After more than a century of both clinical and theoretical interest, the exact nature of such emotional disorders responsible for hysterical symptoms, and their functional consequences on neural systems in the brain, still remain largely unknown. However, several recent studies have used functional brain imaging techniques (such as EEG, fMRI, PET, or SPECT) in the attempt to identify specific neural correlates associated with hysterical conversion symptoms. This article presents a general overview of these findings and of previous neuropsychologically based accounts of hysteria. Functional neuroimaging has revealed selective decreases in the activity of frontal and subcortical circuits involved in motor control during hysterical paralysis, decreases in somatosensory cortices during hysterical anesthesia, or decreases in visual cortex during hysterical blindness. Such changes are usually not accompanied by any significant changes in elementary stages of sensory or motor processing as measured by evoked potentials, although some changes in later stages of integration (such as P300 responses) have been reported. On the other hand, several neuroimaging results have shown increased activation in limbic regions, such as cingulate or orbitofrontal cortex during conversion symptoms affecting different sensory or motor modalities. Taken together, these data generally do not support previous proposals that hysteria might involve an exclusion of sensorimotor representations from awareness through attentional processes. They rather seem to point to a modulation of such representations by primary affective or stress-related factors, perhaps involving primitive reflexive mechanisms of protection and alertness that are partly independent of conscious control, and mediated by dynamic modulatory interactions between limbic and sensorimotor networks. A better understanding of the neuropsychobiological bases of hysterical conversion disorder might therefore be obtained by future imaging studies that compare different conversion symptoms and employ functional connectivity analyses. This should not only lead to improve clinical management of these patients, but also provide new insights on the brain mechanisms of self-awareness.

  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The diagnosis of conversion hysteria is difficult. On the one hand, the elimination of a somatic pathology comes up against the sensitivity limits of paraclinical explorations and on the other hand, a positive psychopathological explanation is far from being systematically found when no organicity is retained to explain the symptoms. In this work, we will progress from a Freudian conception of the conversion as a hieroglyphic inscription on the body of an unconscious decipherable conflict, to a modern vision of conversion disorders which integrates the results of recent functional cerebral neuroimaging studies. If the representation of the action at cortex level seems to be conserved in the conversion paralyses, the blocking of the gesture occurs later at an execution stage whereas hyperactivity of the medial frontal region seems to inhibit the action of the motor cortex via the influence of limbic afferents. In addition to a psychogenic origin, the conversion can also be defined as a functional paralysis of a neuronal zone which is the place of abnormal cerebral activity, potentially reversible pathological activity. All these recent data question the evolution of the definition of conversion disorders. At a time when the clinical perception was the main means of investigating illnesses, Freud had the intelligence to differentiate conversion and simulation: modern neurology has proved him right as the images confirm that conversion and simulation involve distinct cerebral mechanisms. Furthermore, the implication of similar functional neuropathological mechanisms as biological supports of dissociative and conversion disorder has restored the Freudian unity of hysteria, through a detour into neuroscience.
    Annales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatrique 08/2014; 172(6):468–473. DOI:10.1016/j.amp.2012.04.006 · 0.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current theories of conversion disorder (CD) propose that motor symptoms are related to heightened self-monitoring and excessive cognitive control of movements. We tested this hypothesis using quantification of performance on a continuous perceptuo-motor task involving quiet standing. Twelve CD patients and matched controls maintained static balance on a force platform under various attention conditions: (1) with eyes open; (2) with eyes closed (requiring enhanced attention to proprioceptive information to regulate posture); and (3) while performing an attention demanding cognitive task. Compared to controls, CD patients displayed a greater decrease in postural stability in the 'eyes-closed' versus 'eyes-open' condition. In contrast, cognitive distraction led to a normalization of balance in CD. Moreover, sensitivity to the balance interventions correlated significantly with trauma reports and dissociative symptoms. These results indicate that attention plays a crucial role in postural control in CD. More specifically, patients seem to inadvertently use deliberate control of posture (i.e., cognitive investment) of an otherwise nearly automatized perceptuo-motor task. Attentional distraction resulted in a temporary normalization of balance, which may be used to train individuals with CD to guide their attention in a more effective way. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


Available from
Feb 4, 2015