Article

Validity of clinical prediction rules for isolating inpatients with suspected tuberculosis. A systematic review.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY. USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 11/2005; 20(10):947-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0185.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Declining rates of tuberculosis (TB) in the United States has resulted in a low prevalence of the disease among patients placed on respiratory isolation. The purpose of this study is to systematically review decision rules to predict the patient's risk for active pulmonary TB at the time of admission to the hospital.
We searched MEDLINE (1975 to 2003) supplemented by reference tracking. We included studies that reported the sensitivity and specificity of clinical variables for predicting pulmonary TB, used Mycobacterium TB culture as the reference standard, and included at least 50 patients.
Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and abstracted data regarding the sensitivity and specificity of the prediction rules.
Nine studies met inclusion criteria. These studies included 2,194 participants. Most studies found that the presence of TB risk factors, chronic symptoms, positive tuberculin skin test (TST), fever, and upper lobe abnormalities on chest radiograph were associated with TB. Positive TST and a chest radiograph consistent with TB were the predictors showing the strongest association with TB (odds ratio: 5.7 to 13.2 and 2.9 to 31.7, respectively). The sensitivity of the prediction rules for identifying patients with active pulmonary TB varied from 81% to 100%; specificity ranged from 19% to 84%.
Our analysis suggests that clinicians can use prediction rules to identify patients with very low risk of infection among those suspected for TB on admission to the hospital, and thus reduce isolation of patients without TB.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Denise Serebrisky, Jan 16, 2014
2 Followers
 · 
100 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The wise integration of evidence from health care research into diagnostic decisions could influence patient outcomes by improving clinical diagnosis, reducing unnecessary testing, and minimizing diagnostic error. Yet for many, this promise does not match reality. Here, we collect and categorize barriers to the use of health care research evidence in diagnostic decisions, examine their potential consequences, and propose potential ways to overcome these impediments. Barriers were derived from observations over years of trying to inform clinical diagnoses with research evidence, and from interpretations of the literature. Barriers are categorized into those related to the evidence itself, those related to diagnosticians, and those related to health care systems. Tentative solutions are proffered. Data are lacking on the frequency and impact of the identified barriers, as well as on the effectiveness of the proposed solutions. Barriers to the sensible use of evidence from health care research in clinical diagnosis can be identified and categorized, and possible solutions can be imagined. We could, and should, muster the will to overcome these barriers.
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 04/2007; 60(3):217-27. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.002 · 5.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pneumonia is a condition that is often treated by emergency physicians. This article reviews the diagnosis and management of pneumonia in the emergency department and highlights dilemmas in diagnostic testing, use of blood and sputum cultures, hospital admission decisions, infection control, quality measures for pneumonia care, and empiric antimicrobial therapy.
    Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 04/2008; 22(1):53-72, vi. DOI:10.1016/j.idc.2007.10.003 · 2.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many patients with pneumonia are admitted to respiratory isolation for possible tuberculosis (TB), but most do not have active TB. We created a decision instrument to predict which pneumonia patients do not need admission to a TB isolation bed. The design was a prospective case series conducted in 11 university-affiliated, urban, US emergency departments (EDs) (EMERGEncy ID NET). Participants were patients admitted to the hospital through the ED with a diagnosis of pneumonia or suspected TB. The main outcome measure was derivation and validation of a sensitive decision instrument to identify patients not having TB (and not requiring isolation) according to clinical data and chest radiographs. Of 5,079 pneumonia patients, 224 (4.4%) had pulmonary TB according to sputum cultures or tissue staining. The instrument derived to predict which patients did not have pulmonary TB included no TB history or previous positive tuberculin skin test result, nonimmigrant, not homeless, not recently incarcerated, no recent weight loss, and no apical infiltrate or cavitary lesion on plain chest radiograph. When tested on the validation subgroup, the decision instrument exhibited a negative predictive value of 99.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 99.1% to 99.9%), and a sensitivity of 96.4% (95% CI 91.1% to 99.0%). A decision instrument can accurately predict which patients with pneumonia do not require admission to TB isolation rooms.
    Annals of emergency medicine 09/2008; 53(5):625-32. DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.027 · 4.33 Impact Factor