Trends in body size across an environmental gradient: A differential response in scavenging and non-scavenging demersal deep-sea fish

British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (Impact Factor: 5.05). 11/2005; 272(1576):2051-7. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3189
Source: PubMed


Body size trends across environmental gradients are widely reported but poorly understood. Here, we investigate contrasting relationships between size (body mass) and depth in the scavenging and predatory demersal ichthyofauna (800-4800 m) of the North-east Atlantic. The mean size of scavenging fish, identified as those regularly attracted to baited cameras, increased significantly with depth, while in non-scavengers there was a significant decline in size. The increase in scavenger size is a consequence of both intra and inter-specific effects. The observation of opposing relationships, in different functional groups, across the same environmental gradient indicates ecological rather than physiological causes. Simple energetic models indicate that the dissimilarity can be explained by different patterns of food distribution. While food availability declines with depth for both groups, the food is likely to be in large, randomly distributed packages for scavengers and as smaller but more evenly distributed items for predators. Larger size in scavengers permits higher swimming speeds, greater endurance as a consequence of larger energy reserves and lower mass specific metabolic rate, factors that are critical to survival on sporadic food items.

Download full-text


Available from: Imants G Priede, Oct 05, 2015
15 Reads
  • Source
    • "This observed trend agrees with previous studies that showed a depth-related increase in size for scavenging bony fishes39 and small-sized (< 1 m TL) sharks40. In the water column where food availability decreases with depth, a larger size is believed to represent a metabolic advantage to scavenge in the deep sea's oligotrophic environment39. However, our dataset contains only similarly aged specimens i.e. specimens close to maturity. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Counterilluminating animals use ventral photogenic organs (photophores) to mimic the residual downwelling light and cloak their silhouette from upward-looking predators. To cope with variable conditions of pelagic light environments they typically adjust their luminescence intensity. Here, we found evidence that bioluminescent sharks instead emit a constant light output and move up and down in the water column to remain cryptic at iso-luminance depth. We observed, across 21 globally distributed shark species, a correlation between capture depth and the proportion of a ventral area occupied by photophores. This information further allowed us, using visual modelling, to provide an adaptive explanation for shark photophore pattern diversity: in species facing moderate predation risk from below, counterilluminating photophores were partially co-opted for bioluminescent signalling, leading to complex patterns. In addition to increase our understanding of pelagic ecosystems our study emphasizes the importance of bioluminescence as a speciation driver.
    Scientific Reports 03/2014; 4:4328. DOI:10.1038/srep04328 · 5.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The occurrence of larger fish in deeper waters has been reported in marine (MacPherson and Duarte, 1991; Collins et al., 2005) and freshwater (Wells, 1968; Burczynski et al., 1987) environments. However, like in the LMR, results have been inconsistent and dependent upon the locations investigated and the sampling techniques used. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A substantial body of literature exists about depth distribution of fish in oceans, lakes and reservoirs, but less is known about fish depth distribution in large rivers. Most of the emphasis on fish distributions in rivers has focused on longitudinal and latitudinal spatial distributions. Knowledge on depth distribution is necessary to understand species and community habitat needs. Considering this void, our goal was to identify patterns in fish benthic distribution along depth gradients in the Lower Mississippi River. Fish were collected over 14 years in depths down to 27 m. Fish exhibited non-random depth distributions that varied seasonally and according to species. Species richness was highest in shallow water, with about 50% of the 62 species detected no longer collected in water deeper than 8 m and about 75% no longer collected in water deeper than 12 m. Although richness was highest in shallow water, most species were not restricted to shallow water. Rather, most species used a wide range of depths. A weak depth zonation occurred, not as strong as that reported for deep oceans and lakes. Larger fish tended to occur in deeper water during the high-water period of an annual cycle, but no correlation was evident during the low-water period. The advent of landscape ecology has guided river research to search for spatial patterns along the length of the river and associated floodplains. Our results suggest that fish assemblages in large rivers are also structured vertically. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
    River Research and Applications 03/2014; 30(3). DOI:10.1002/rra.2652 · 2.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Although few mechanistic insights are provided by the empirical relationships used, the differences in feeding mode of epifaunal and demersal megafauna compared to infaunal organisms may explain the smaller reductions in biomass into the future. For example the deposit feeding megafauna, such as holothurians, are able to rapidly remove newly deposited POC (Lauerman et al., 1997; Miller et al., 2000) and scavenging megafauna, such as demersal fishes, can quickly access larger organic food-falls (Collins et al., 2005; Rex et al., 2006), both potentially ameliorating the impact of reducing POC flux to this group. Differential changes within (and potentially between) ocean basins will likely lead to major changes in the spatial distribution of benthic species, with subsequent impacts on biodiversity. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Seafloor organisms are vital for healthy marine ecosystems, contributing to elemental cycling, benthic remineralization, and ultimately sequestration of carbon. Deep-sea life is primarily reliant on the export flux of particulate organic carbon from the surface ocean for food, but most ocean biogeochemistry models predict global decreases in export flux resulting from 21st century anthropogenically induced warming. Here we show that decadal-to-century scale changes in carbon export associated with climate change lead to an estimated 5.2% decrease in future (2091–2100) global open ocean benthic biomass under RCP8.5 (reduction of 5.2 Mt C) compared with contemporary conditions (2006–2015). Our projections use multi-model mean export flux estimates from eight fully coupled earth system models, which contributed to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5, that have been forced by high and low representative concentration pathways (RCP8.5 and 4.5, respectively). These export flux estimates are used in conjunction with published empirical relationships to predict changes in benthic biomass. The polar oceans and some upwelling areas may experience increases in benthic biomass, but most other regions show decreases, with up to 38% reductions in parts of the northeast Atlantic. Our analysis projects a future ocean with smaller sized infaunal benthos, potentially reducing energy transfer rates though benthic multicellular food webs. More than 80% of potential deep-water biodiversity hotspots known around the world, including canyons, seamounts, and cold-water coral reefs, are projected to experience negative changes in biomass. These major reductions in biomass may lead to widespread change in benthic ecosystems and the functions and services they provide.
    Global Change Biology 12/2013; 20(6). DOI:10.1111/gcb.12480 · 8.04 Impact Factor
Show more