Rapidly shifting environmental baselines among fishers of the Gulf of California. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 1957-1962

Environment Department, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (Impact Factor: 5.05). 09/2005; 272(1575):1957-62. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3175
Source: PubMed


Shifting environmental baselines are inter-generational changes in perception of the state of the environment. As one generation replaces another, people's perceptions of what is natural change even to the extent that they no longer believe historical anecdotes of past abundance or size of species. Although widely accepted, this phenomenon has yet to be quantitatively tested. Here we survey three generations of fishers from Mexico's Gulf of California (N=108), where fish populations have declined steeply over the last 60 years, to investigate how far and fast their environmental baselines are shifting. Compared to young fishers, old fishers named five times as many species and four times as many fishing sites as once being abundant/productive but now depleted (Kruskal-Wallis tests, both p<0.001) with no evidence of a slowdown in rates of loss experienced by younger compared to older generations (Kruskal-Wallis test, n.s. in both cases). Old fishers caught up to 25 times as many Gulf grouper Mycteroperca jordani as young fishers on their best ever fishing day (regression r(2)=0.62, p<0.001). Despite times of plentiful large fish still being within living memory, few young fishers appreciated that large species had ever been common or nearshore sites productive. Such rapid shifts in perception of what is natural help explain why society is tolerant of the creeping loss of biodiversity. They imply a large educational hurdle in efforts to reset expectations and targets for conservation.

Download full-text


Available from: Jorge Torre,
  • Source
    • "In cases where entrenched paradigms or shifted baselines exist, a historical perspective can provide important data to inform local communities and decision-makers of the magnitude of changes that have occurred. Communicating the experience of older fishers can also play an important role in combating such paradigms, as older fishers are likely to have experienced more striking declines than younger fishers (Beaudreau and Levin, 2014; S aenz-Arroyo et al., 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ecological data sets rarely extend back more than a few decades, limiting our understanding of environmental change and its drivers. Marine historical ecology has played a critical role in filling these data gaps by illuminating the magnitude and rate of ongoing changes in marine ecosystems. Yet despite a growing body of knowledge, historical insights are rarely explicitly incorporated in mainstream conservation and management efforts. Failing to consider historical change can have major implications for conservation, such as the ratcheting down of expectations of ecosystem quality over time, leading to less ambitious targets for recovery or restoration. We discuss several unconventional sources used by historical ecologists to fill data gaps - including menus, newspaper articles, cookbooks, museum collections, artwork, benthic sediment cores - and novel techniques for their analysis. We specify opportunities for the integration of historical data into conservation and management, and highlight the important role that these data can play in filling conservation data gaps and motivating conservation actions. As historical marine ecology research continues to grow as a multidisciplinary enterprise, great opportunities remain to foster direct linkages to conservation and improve the outlook for marine ecosystems.
    Ocean & Coastal Management 10/2015; 115:31-40. DOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.04.019 · 1.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "legal right (Cinti et al. 2009 , 2010 ; Basurto et al. 2012 ). As a result, the fi sheries of northwestern Mexico are generally characterized by de facto open-access (Cint et al. 2009 ) and it is increasingly evident that these regional small-scale fi sheries and associated ecosystems are in decline (Sala et al. 2004 ; Saenz-Arroyo et al. 2005 ; OECD 2006 ; Lluch-Cota et al. 2007 ; Peckham et al. 2007 ; Sagarin et al. 2008 ). However, there are documented examples of fi shers who have continued to sustain collective action, through enduring self-governance or co-management regimes, despite being embedded in a larger system characterized by illegality and corruption ( Basurto 2005 ; Ponce-Díaz et al. 2009b ; Basurto and Speer 2012 ; McCay et al. 2014 ). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most research on small-scale fi sheries governance derives from developing countries, limiting our understanding of small-scale fi sheries dynamics within developed nations. This knowledge gap creates disparities between these systems, limiting comparisons of similarities and differences across ranges of socioeconomic development and deriving solutions that can be feasibly applied to small-scale fi sheries governance. Our chapter compares small-scale fi sheries governance systems in the Hawaiian Islands and Baja California Sur, Mexico, using the interactive governance framework. Historically, collective action and self-governance were important in both regions, yet over time, have eroded due to a variety of factors. The current state of small-scale fi sheries in the Hawaiian Islands and Baja California Sur, Mexico is generally characterized by open-access with low governability, but with opportunities to hybridize customary and centralized management systems through co-management. This chapter will provide insight into why this has occurred by drawing on similarities across small-scale fi sheries in developed and developing country contexts, in addition to highlighting divergences occurring
    Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries Global Reflections, Edited by Svein Jentoft and Ratana Chuenpagdee, 01/2015: pages 199-221; Spring., ISBN: 978-3-319-17034-3
  • Source
    • "Hence, environmental degradation influenced continued involvement in fishing. This is also supportive of other studies in Central America and Asia [45] [46] [47] [48]. This environmental knowledge was thus a factor for rejecting the third hypothesis that fishers have dropped out of the fishing industry because of the severity of the declining catches [2] [3]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: El Salvador is one of the most environmentally degraded nations in Latin America, but the declining fishing industry is under-studied compared with deforestation and landuse. This paper examines the reactions to fish stock decline of two generations of fishers in La Union, El Salvador on the Golfo de Fonseca, one of the most important fishing areas in Latin America, using face to face interviews and questionaires. Both older (>35 years) and younger (<36 years) fishers supplemented their income with trading, farming and loans from their relatives in the United States. All older fishers reported larger fish catches five and ten years previously than at present. Previously, fishers caught more fish, but significantly more younger fishers than older fishers reported their fathers caught more fish than they did, indicating an increasing gap in fish catches in recent decades. More younger fishers than older fishers had fathers or male kin who were also fishers, indicating young men were less likely to join fishing without a parent or kin already involved. Minorities of both older and younger fishers engaged in supplementary activities. Environmental degradation disuaded fishers from switching to farming or hunting. The findings are similar to findings elsewhere on the decline of fish resources and generational gaps in environmental knowledge, but differ in that some other studies report fewer opportunities for fishers to access alternative or complementary activities. These findings are relevant to Latin American studies, considering the great value of the Golfo de Fonseca to the livelihoods of Central America.
    Marine Policy 11/2014; 52. DOI:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.10.008 · 2.62 Impact Factor
Show more