Article

Preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity are more predictive of costs than postoperative complications: a case study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

University of Kentucky, Department of Surgery, Lexington, Kentucky 40536, USA.
Annals of Surgery (Impact Factor: 7.19). 10/2005; 242(4):463-8; discussion 468-71.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This single-center study tested the hypothesis that preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity predict more variation in hospital costs than complications.
Complications after surgical operations have been shown to significantly increase hospital cost. The impact on complication-related costs of preoperative risk factors is less well known.
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) preoperative risk factors, surgical complexity, and outcomes, along with hospital costs, were analyzed for a random sample of 5875 patients on 6 surgical services. Operation complexity was assessed by work RVUs (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Resource Based Relative Value Scale). The difference in mean hospital costs associated with all variables was analyzed. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the cost variation associated with all variables separately and combined.
Fifty-one of 60 preoperative risk factors, work RVUs, and 22 of 29 postoperative complications were associated with higher variable direct costs (P < 0.05). Linear regressions showed that risk factors predicted 33% (P < 0.001) of cost variation, work RVUs predicted 23% (P < 0.001), and complications predicted 20% (P < 0.001). Risk factors and work RVUs together predicted 49% of cost variation (P < 0.001) or 16% more than risk factors alone. Adding complications to this combined model modestly increased prediction of costs by 4% for a total of 53% (P < 0.001).
Preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity are more effective predictors of hospital costs than complications. Preoperative intervention to reduce risk could lead to significant cost savings. Payers and regulatory agencies should risk-adjust hospital cost assessments using clinical information that integrates costs, preoperative risk, complexity of operation, and outcomes.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
52 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We sought to assess the independent effect of concomitant adhesions (CAs) on patient outcome in abdominal surgery.
    Journal of Surgical Research 07/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2014.07.044 · 2.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Reoperative surgery is suspected, but not proven, to increase postoperative complication rates. In the absence of a specific definition for reoperative surgery, the American College of Surgeons NSQIP has proposed using procedural coding for lysis of adhesions (LOA) as a surrogate for reoperative surgery to risk adjust hospitals. We hypothesized that coding of reoperative surgery will be associated with worse 30-day outcomes and, for abdominal procedures, will be more accurate than operative dictation and coding of “lysis of adhesions.” Study Design Reoperative surgery was categorized at the time of data abstraction from February 2012 to December 2012 for all NSQIP cases collected at a single institution by independent surgical clinical reviewers. Reoperative surgery classification and coding of LOA were compared with each other and with 30-day outcomes. The setting was a tertiary cancer center, multispecialty NSQIP model. During the study period, 1,289 operations were classified as nonreoperative (n = 793), regionally reoperative (n = 39; prior surgery in an adjacent area of current operation), or locally reoperative (n = 457; prior surgery at same site or organ). Results In the multispecialty cohort, the non−risk-adjusted rates of overall 30-day morbidity, serious morbidity, and mortality were 21.5%, 17.7%, and 0.5%. Compared with nonreoperative surgery (overall 30-day morbidity 16.8%, serious morbidity 13.9%, and mortality .38%), both regionally reoperative surgery (overall 30-day morbidity 30.8%, serious morbidity 28.2%, and mortality 2.5%) and locally reoperative surgery (overall 30-day morbidity 28.9%, serious morbidity 23.4%, and mortality .66%) were associated with worse outcomes (p < 0.001). One hundred ninety-nine of the 327 gastrointestinal/laparotomy cases were recorded as reoperative, but only of 20 of these were CPT coded as LOA (sensitivity = 10%). Conclusions Reoperative surgery is frequent, increases the risk of complications, and can be captured. Operative LOA coding vastly under reports reoperative surgery and, therefore, is not an adequate surrogate for this important risk factor.
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons 07/2014; 219(1):143–150. DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.024 · 4.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Complex hernia repairs represent a formidable surgical challenge. Several comprehensive hernia centers, including ours, with advanced expertise have recently emerged across the country. However, the effects of tertiary specialization remain largely unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of developing a comprehensive hernia center on the referral patterns and costs of patients with complex hernias. A prospectively maintained database was used to identify all patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair (VHR) between 2006 and 2013 at the Case Comprehensive Hernia Center. Patients were separated into two groups by zip code: those traveling either < 25 or > 100 miles. Demographics, operative characteristics, length of stay and costs data were analyzed. Of all patients who underwent open VHR during the study period, 287 met the inclusion criteria. Hernia length, width and area were all significantly larger for patients traveling > 100 miles (P < 0.01 for all). These patients were also more likely to have active mesh infections (OR 3.57) and non-healing wounds (OR 5.00) when compared with local patients. Length of hospital stay was significantly longer for patients traveling > 100 miles compared to those traveling < 25 miles (9.7 vs. 6.8; P < 0.0001). Surgical site occurrence, infection and hernia recurrence rates were similar between the two groups during the follow-up period. Patients who traveled > 100 miles incurred significantly higher fixed direct and variable direct costs compared to those who traveled < 25 miles (P < 0.05 for both). The development of a comprehensive hernia center results in centralization of complex hernia care. Patients traveling > 100 miles for ventral hernia repair have significantly larger and more complex hernias. The implications for improved patient outcomes and potential reimbursement issues for providing this care should be carefully evaluated.
    Hernia 07/2014; 18(5). DOI:10.1007/s10029-014-1279-8 · 2.09 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
22 Downloads
Available from
May 19, 2014