Article

Davenport DL, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Mentzer RM Jr. Preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity are more predictive of costs than postoperative complications: a case study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Ann Surg

University of Kentucky, Department of Surgery, Lexington, Kentucky 40536, USA.
Annals of Surgery (Impact Factor: 8.33). 10/2005; 242(4):463-8; discussion 468-71.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This single-center study tested the hypothesis that preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity predict more variation in hospital costs than complications.
Complications after surgical operations have been shown to significantly increase hospital cost. The impact on complication-related costs of preoperative risk factors is less well known.
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) preoperative risk factors, surgical complexity, and outcomes, along with hospital costs, were analyzed for a random sample of 5875 patients on 6 surgical services. Operation complexity was assessed by work RVUs (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Resource Based Relative Value Scale). The difference in mean hospital costs associated with all variables was analyzed. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the cost variation associated with all variables separately and combined.
Fifty-one of 60 preoperative risk factors, work RVUs, and 22 of 29 postoperative complications were associated with higher variable direct costs (P < 0.05). Linear regressions showed that risk factors predicted 33% (P < 0.001) of cost variation, work RVUs predicted 23% (P < 0.001), and complications predicted 20% (P < 0.001). Risk factors and work RVUs together predicted 49% of cost variation (P < 0.001) or 16% more than risk factors alone. Adding complications to this combined model modestly increased prediction of costs by 4% for a total of 53% (P < 0.001).
Preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity are more effective predictors of hospital costs than complications. Preoperative intervention to reduce risk could lead to significant cost savings. Payers and regulatory agencies should risk-adjust hospital cost assessments using clinical information that integrates costs, preoperative risk, complexity of operation, and outcomes.

0 Followers
 · 
70 Views
  • Source
    • "A literature review was performed in major medical information databases since 2000 [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]. We considered a model similar to that of other quality improvement programs such as the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper we describe the creation of a protocol for pre-operative exams request and an associated surgical record.
    12/2013; 9:975-984. DOI:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.109
  • Source
    JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons / Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 01/2006; 10(4):401-8. · 0.79 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Physical Status (ASA PS) classifications and the other National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) preoperative risk factors. The ASA PS has been shown to predict morbidity and mortality in surgical patients but is inconsistently applied and clinically imprecise. It is desirable to have a method for validating ASA PS classification levels. The NSQIP preoperative risk factors, including ASA PS, were recorded from a random sample of 5878 surgical patients on 6 services between October 1, 2001 and September 30, 2003 at the University of Kentucky Medical Center. Mortality, morbidity, costs, and length of stay were obtained and compared across ASA PS levels. The ability of 1) ASA PS alone, 2) the other NSQIP risk factors, and, 3) all factors combined to predict outcomes was analyzed. A model using the other NSQIP risk factors was developed to predict ASA PS. ASA PS alone was a strong predictor of outcomes (P < 0.01). However, the other NSQIP risk factors were better predictors as a group. There was significant interdependence between the ASA PS and the other NSQIP risk factors. Predictions of ASA PS using the other factors showed strong agreement with the anesthesiologists' assignments. The NSQIP risk factors other than ASA PS can and should be used to validate ASA PS classifications.
    Annals of Surgery 05/2006; 243(5):636-41; discussion 641-4. DOI:10.1097/01.sla.0000216508.95556.cc · 8.33 Impact Factor
Show more