Measuring patient safety climate: a review of surveys

Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Quality and Safety in Health Care (Impact Factor: 2.16). 11/2005; 14(5):364-6. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014217
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Five years ago the Institute of Medicine recommended improving patient safety by addressing organizational cultural issues. Since then, surveys measuring a patient safety climate considered predictive of health outcomes have begun to emerge. This paper compares the general characteristics, dimensions covered, psychometrics performed, and uses in studies of patient safety climate surveys.
Systematic literature review.
Nine surveys were found that measured the patient safety climate of an organization. All used Likert scales, mostly to measure attitudes of individuals. Nearly all covered five common dimensions of patient safety climate: leadership, policies and procedures, staffing, communication, and reporting. The strength of psychometric testing varied. While all had been used to compare units within or between hospitals, only one had explored the association between organizational climate and patient outcomes.
Patient safety climate surveys vary considerably. Achievement of a culture conducive to patient safety may be an admirable goal in its own right, but more effort should be expended on understanding the relationship between measures of patient safety climate and patient outcomes.

Download full-text


Available from: William B Weeks, Aug 14, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Patient safety is considered to be crucial to healthcare quality and is one of the major parameters monitored by all healthcare organizations around the world. Nurses play a vital role in maintaining and promoting patient safety due to the nature of their work.AimsThe purpose of this study was to investigate nurses’ perceptions about patient safety culture and to identify the factors that need to be emphasized in order to develop and maintain the culture of safety among nurses in Oman.MethodsA descriptive and cross-sectional design was used. Patient safety culture was assessed by using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture among 414 registered nurses working in four major governmental hospitals in Oman. Descriptive statistics and general linear regression were employed to assess the association between patient safety culture and demographic variables.ResultsNurses who perceived more supervisor or manager expectations, feedback and communications about errors, teamwork across hospital units, and hospital handoffs and transitions had more overall perception of patient safety. Nurses who perceived more teamwork within units and more feedback and communications about errors had more frequency of events reported. Furthermore, nurses who had more years of experience and were working in teaching hospitals had more perception of patient safety culture.Conclusion Learning and continuous improvement, hospital management support, supervisor/manager expectations, feedback and communications about error, teamwork, hospital handoffs and transitions were found to be major patient safety culture predictors. Investing in practices and systems that focus on improving these aspects is likely to enhance the culture of patient safety in Omani hospitals and others like them.Implications for Nursing and Health PolicyStrategies to nurture patient safety culture in Omani hospitals should focus upon building leadership capacity that support open communication, blame free, team work and continuous organizational learning.
    International Nursing Review 03/2015; 62(1). DOI:10.1111/inr.12159 · 0.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Establishing a culture of patient safety can be effective in reducing the incidence of medical errors and solving concerns of safety inadequacy in health systems. The purpose of this study was to as-sess the culture of patient safety in the selected hospitals, and compare the results with published reports of AHRQ. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of BPUMS. The subjects signed the informed consent form to participle in the study. Confidentiality was maintained throughout the study reports. Cross-sectional study was conducted in 2012; the study sample was composed of 364 staffs working at two selected hospitals affiliated to Bushehr University of Medical Sciences. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was used to collect data. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to analyze the data. No reports of events in both studied hospitals and benchmark were accounted for the most of the reported errors, although this indicator in studied hospitals was nearly 23% higher than that of the benchmark report. The highest patient safety grade in studied hospitals and benchmark was "acceptable" and "very good", respectively. The highest percentage of positive response to patient safety dimension was organization learning and then teamwork within units in studied hospitals. Teamwork within units also was the highest average percent in * Corresponding author. M. Azmal et al. 3038 benchmark report. Non-punitive response to errors had the lowest positive percentage of partici-pant responses in both studies. To achieve the patient safety culture, we do not need to blame in-dividual and apply punitive approach when errors occur. This makes person accept responsibility for their actions honestly and report errors in a timely manner to prevent reoccurrence of similar errors.
    Health 12/2014; 6(6):3037-3044. DOI:10.4236/health.2014.621342 · 0.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Die Messung und Evaluation von Sicherheitskultur in der internationalen Versorgungsforschung gewann in den vergangenen Jahren zunehmend an Bedeutung. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit ist es, ein Instrument zur quantitativen Messung der Sicherheitskultur im Krankenhaus psycho-metrisch zu evaluieren. Dies wird in der Publikation dieser kumulativen Dissertationsschrift be-schrieben. Im Vorfeld hierzu wird im zweiten Kapitel der Begriff der Sicherheitskultur auf Grundlage von theoretischen Auseinandersetzungen hergeleitet und vom Begriff des Sicherheitsklimas abge-grenzt. Im dritten Kapitel werden die gemeinsamen Aspekte dieser beiden Konzepte herausge-arbeitet und in 15 wesentlichen Dimensionen zur quantitativen Erfassung von Sicherheitskultur zusammengefasst. Auf Grundlage einer systematischen Literaturrecherche wird im vierten Kapi-tel ein Überblick über die Instrumente zur quantitativen Messung von Sicherheitskultur geschaf-fen. Hauptbestandteil dieser Arbeit ist der im fünften Kapitel vorgestellte Artikel zur psycho-metrischen Evaluation des Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture für das Krankenhausma-nagement (HSOPS_M). In der vorliegenden Publikation wurde geprüft, ob der für eine Befra-gung von ärztlichen Direktoren adaptierte Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture für das Krankenhausmanagement (HSOPS_M) vergleichbare psychometrische Eigenschaften aufweist wie der für eine Befragung von Mitarbeitern konzipierte HSOPS. Die Ergebnisse sprechen für angemessene psychometrische Eigenschaften des HSOPS_M. Das Instrument ist für eine quantitative Erfassung der Sicherheitskultur aus Perspektive des Krankenhausmanagements geeignet. Der HSOPS_M kann national aber auch international als Benchmark-Instrument dienen.
    06/2012, Degree: Dr rer med, Supervisor: Holger Pfaff