Trends in Contacts With Mental Health Professionals and Cost Barriers to Mental Health Care Among Adults With Significant Psychological Distress in the United States: 1997–2002

Department of Psychiatry of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.55). 12/2005; 95(11):2009-14. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.037630
Source: PubMed


I assessed recent trends in prevalence of any contact with mental health professionals and nonuse of mental health care or prescription medications owing to cost among adults with significant psychological distress.
In samples drawn from the National Health Interview Survey of 1997-2002, multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association of survey year with mental health professional contacts and nonuse of mental health care or prescription medications owing to cost.
The prevalence of any contact with mental health professionals increased from 29.1% in 1997 to 35.5% in 2002 (P<.05). The prevalence of nonuse of services because of cost also increased-from 15.6% to 20.0% for mental health care (P<.05) and from 27.7% to 34.1% for medication use (P<.001). Age, racial/ethnic, income, and insurance status disparities in receiving care persisted over the study period.
The number of individuals in need of mental health care who contacted mental health professionals grew in recent years, as did the number of individuals who encountered cost barriers to such care. Barring dramatic improvements in health insurance coverage, more individuals will likely face such barriers in coming years.

6 Reads
  • Source
    • "Contact with health care professionals for mental health issues has increased as more people with mental illnesses are covered by insurance [16]. Nevertheless, nearly one in three (32%) persons with mental health disorders such as major depression report UMHCN, and symptomatic individuals increasingly cite cost as a barrier to obtaining care [17,18]. In addition, attitudes indicating low treatment acceptability have lessened only modestly over time, and among those with symptoms, are associated with not seeking and failing to complete treatment [19-22]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is little current information about the unmet mental health care need (UMHCN) and reasons for it among those exposed to the World Trade Center (WTC) terrorist attacks. The purpose of this study was to assess the level of UMHCN among symptomatic individuals enrolled in the WTC Health Registry (WTCHR) in 2011–2012, and to analyze the relationship between UMHCN due to attitudinal, cost, and access factors and mental health symptom severity, mental health care utilization, health insurance availability, and social support. The WTCHR is a prospective cohort study of individuals with reported exposure to the 2001 WTC attacks. This study used data from 9,803 adults who completed the 2003–2004 (Wave 1) and 2011–2012 (Wave 3) surveys and had posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or depression in 2011–2012. We estimated logistic regression models relating perceived attitudinal, cost and access barriers to symptom severity, health care utilization, a lack of health insurance, and social support after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics. Slightly more than one-third (34.2%) of study participants reported an UMHCN. Symptom severity was a strong predictor of UMHCN due to attitudinal and perceived cost and access reasons. Attitudinal UMHCN was common among those not using mental health services, particularly those with relatively severe mental health symptoms. Cost-related UMHCN was significantly associated with a lack of health insurance but not service usage. Access-related barriers were significantly more common among those who did not use any mental health services. A higher level of social support served as an important buffer against cost and access UMHCN. A significant proportion of individuals exposed to the WTC attacks with depression or PTSD 10 years later reported an UMHCN, and individuals with more severe and disabling conditions, those who lacked health insurance, and those with low levels of social support were particularly vulnerable.
    BMC Public Health 05/2014; 14(1):491. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-491 · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Within the United States, financial barriers to mental health treatment seeking may have grown over the past decade (Mojtabai, 2005). During this period, however, public attitudes towards mental health treatment seeking became more favorable (Mojtabai, 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim was to examine barriers to initiation and continuation of treatment among individuals with common mental disorders in the US general population. Respondents in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication with common 12-month DSM-IV mood, anxiety, substance, impulse control and childhood disorders were asked about perceived need for treatment, structural barriers and attitudinal/evaluative barriers to initiation and continuation of treatment. Low perceived need was reported by 44.8% of respondents with a disorder who did not seek treatment. Desire to handle the problem on one's own was the most common reason among respondents with perceived need both for not seeking treatment (72.6%) and for dropping out of treatment (42.2%). Attitudinal/evaluative factors were much more important than structural barriers both to initiating (97.4% v. 22.2%) and to continuing (81.9% v. 31.8%) of treatment. Reasons for not seeking treatment varied with illness severity. Low perceived need was a more common reason for not seeking treatment among individuals with mild (57.0%) than moderate (39.3%) or severe (25.9%) disorders, whereas structural and attitudinal/evaluative barriers were more common among respondents with more severe conditions. Low perceived need and attitudinal/evaluative barriers are the major barriers to treatment seeking and staying in treatment among individuals with common mental disorders. Efforts to increase treatment seeking and reduce treatment drop-out need to take these barriers into consideration as well as to recognize that barriers differ as a function of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.
    Psychological Medicine 12/2010; 41(8):1751-61. DOI:10.1017/S0033291710002291 · 5.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Historically, the behavioral health of the agricultural population has been affected by their economic well being. Sufficient research now exists to recognize the agricultural population as a health disparity group. A pattern of environmental, cultural, and economic factors unique to the agricultural community suggests a higher risk for health disparity among persons engaged in agriculture. This article traces the development of specialized behavioral healthcare services designed for the agricultural population. Gradually over the past few years a new field, agricultural behavioral health, has emerged. The land means everything to farmers. Ownership of a family farm is the triumphant result of the struggles of multiple generations of immigrants to America. Losing the family farm is the ultimate loss—bringing shame to the generation that has let down their forebears and dashing their successors' dreams. Farming has always been a stressful occupation because many of the factors that affect agricultural production are largely beyond the control of the producers, such as weather, disease, government policy, and changing supply/demand. The emotional well being of family farmers and ranchers is intimately intertwined with these changes. Development of behavioral healthcare services specific to the agricultural population generally has accompanied periods of economic difficulty for farmers, ranchers, and farm laborers, such as the Great Depression of the 1930s and the Farm Crisis of the 1980s. The development of rural social work and the federal Works Progress Administration were responses to the great numbers of unemployed, displaced, and emotionally distressed rural people, who mainly were unable to continue farming or working in farming-related industries during the Great Depression. Similarly, the Farm Crisis of the 1980s contributed to a suicide rate among male farmers and ranchers that was nearly four times as high as the national average and led to a rash of homicides (e.g., shootings of farm lenders) and social protests (e.g., rallies at farm auctions), making the news on a daily basis. One response to the 1980s crisis was the institution, in a number of agricultural-based states, of telephone hotlines to provide confidential and free supportive counseling for farm and rural callers (e.g., Iowa Concern Hotline, Kansas Rural Family Helpline, Nebraska Rural Response Hotline, Wisconsin Farm Center). The hotlines employed trained telephone responders familiar with agriculture who referred callers, as necessary, to various forms of assistance such as mediation and professional mental health services. Concurrent with the initiation of farm crisis telephone services in the 1980s, leaders in several states developed specialized behavioral health counseling services for farmers and ranchers. The Farm Resource Center in Illinois, described by Hannan (1998), employed trained outreach workers familiar with farming to visit farmers and their families in their homes. The outreach workers provided crisis counseling and connected farmers with other types of supports such as
    01/2008; 32(1). DOI:10.1037/h0095960
Show more


6 Reads
Available from