New and lingering controversies in pediatric end-of-life care

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.47). 11/2005; 116(4):872-83. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-0905
Source: PubMed


Professional societies, ethics institutes, and the courts have recommended principles to guide the care of children with life-threatening conditions; however, little is known about the degree to which pediatric care providers are aware of or in agreement with these guidelines. The study's objectives were to determine the extent to which physicians and nurses in critical care, hematology/oncology, and other subspecialties are in agreement with one another and with widely published ethical recommendations regarding the withholding and withdrawing of life support, the provision of adequate analgesia, and the role of parents in end-of-life decision-making.
Three children's hospitals and 4 general hospitals with PICUs in eastern, southwestern, and southern parts of the United States were surveyed. This population-based sample was composed of attending physicians, house officers, and nurses who cared for children (age: 1 month to 18 years) with life-threatening conditions in PICUs or in medical, surgical, or hematology/oncology units, floors, or departments. Main outcome measures included concerns of conscience, knowledge and beliefs, awareness of published guidelines, and agreement or disagreement with guidelines.
A total of 781 clinicians were sampled, including 209 attending physicians, 116 house officers, and 456 nurses. The overall response rate was 64%. Fifty-four percent of house officers and substantial proportions of attending physicians and nurses reported, "At times, I have acted against my conscience in providing treatment to children in my care." For example, 38% of critical care attending physicians and 25% of hematology/oncology attending physicians expressed these concerns, whereas 48% of critical care nurses and 38% of hematology/oncology nurses did so. Across specialties, approximately 20 times as many nurses, 15 times as many house officers, and 10 times as many attending physicians agreed with the statement, "Sometimes I feel we are saving children who should not be saved," as agreed with the statement, "Sometimes I feel we give up on children too soon." However, hematology/oncology attending physicians (31%) were less likely than critical care (56%) and other subspecialty (66%) attending physicians to report, "Sometimes I feel the treatments I offer children are overly burdensome." Many respondents held views that diverged widely from published recommendations. Despite a lack of awareness of key guidelines, across subspecialties the vast majority of attending physicians (range: 92-98%, depending on specialty) and nurses (range: 83-85%) rated themselves as somewhat to very knowledgeable regarding ethical issues.
There is a need for more hospital-based ethics education and more interdisciplinary and cross-subspecialty discussion of inherently complex and stressful pediatric end-of-life cases. Education should focus on establishing appropriate goals of care, as well as on pain management, medically supplied nutrition and hydration, and the appropriate use of paralytic agents. More research is needed on clinicians' regard for the dead-donor rule.

Download full-text


Available from: Marcia Levetown,
1 Follower
35 Reads
  • Source
    • "Building on these findings, research identified the critical importance of including the surrogate decision maker in structured conversations with the patient about the patients' goals for EOL care [9]. Nevertheless, ACP conversations are frequently not initiated before a medical crisis because of the strong emotions evoked [10] or fear of taking away hope [11], which contrasts with empirically based research that early palliative care can instill hope [12], maintain psychological well-being [13], increase congruence in treatment preferences between patients and their surrogate decision makers [14], prolong survival [15], and improve quality of life and mood among surviving relatives [16]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To test the feasibility, acceptability and safety of a pediatric advance care planning intervention, Family-Centered Advance Care Planning for Teens With Cancer (FACE-TC). Adolescent (age 14-20years)/family dyads (N = 30) with a cancer diagnosis participated in a two-armed, randomized, controlled trial. Exclusion criteria included severe depression and impaired mental status. Acceptability was measured by the Satisfaction Questionnaire. General Estimating Equations models assessed the impact of FACE-TC on 3-month post-intervention outcomes as measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scale, the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Cancer-Specific Module, the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories, the Spiritual Well-Being Scale of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-IV, and advance directive completion. Acceptability was demonstrated with enrollment of 72% of eligible families, 100% attendance at all three sessions, 93% retention at 3-month post-intervention, and 100% data completion. Intervention families rated FACE-TC worthwhile (100%), whereas adolescents' ratings increased over time (65%-82%). Adolescents' anxiety decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months post-intervention in both groups (β = -5.6; p = .0212). Low depressive symptom scores and high quality of life scores were maintained by adolescents in both groups. Advance directives were located easily in medical records (100% of FACE-TC adolescents vs. no controls). Oncologists received electronic copies. Total Spirituality scores (β = 8.1; p = .0296) were significantly higher among FACE-TC adolescents versus controls. The FACE-TC adolescents endorsed the best time to bring up end-of-life decisions: 19% before being sick, 19% at diagnosis, none when first ill or hospitalized, 25% when dying, and 38% for all of the above. Family-Centered Advance Care Planning for Teens With Cancer demonstrated feasibility and acceptability. Courageous adolescents willingly participated in highly structured, in-depth pediatric advance care planning conversations safely.
    Journal of Adolescent Health 12/2013; 54(6). DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.10.206 · 3.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In a survey of approximately 500 clinicians from three children's hospitals and four general hospitals with pediatric intensive care units, researchers found that participants rated themselves as " somewhat to very knowledgeable " of end-of-life care ethic guidelines and recommendations. However, in an assessment of ethical practice guidelines, many lacked awareness of key components (Solomon et al., 2005). An additional complicating factor is that in situations requiring the individualized assessment of competence and a determination of a mature minor status, the assessment is contingent on a physician's subjective evaluation. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this article is threefold: (a) to describe the relevant ethical and legal issues associated with decisional capacity among minors and to discuss the importance of these concepts for children and adolescents living with HIV, (b) to provide a framework for assessing the decisional capacity of children and adolescents with HIV, and (c) to present a model for thinking about how to use this assessment data to guide action along the protection-autonomy continuum.
    Ethics & Behavior 03/2010; 20(2-2):83-94. DOI:10.1080/10508421003595901 · 0.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Finally, the decision is implemented and its consequences are evaluated. Several guidelines have been published on these different steps [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]. In the following sections relevant issues pertaining to these steps are elaborated. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most deaths in the pediatric intensive care unit occur after a decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments. The management of children at the end of life can be divided into three steps. The first concerns the decision-making process. The second concerns the actions taken once a decision has been made to forego life-sustaining treatments. The third regards the evaluation of the decision and its implementation. The mission of pediatric intensive care has expanded to provide the best possible care to dying children and their families. Improving the quality of care received by dying children remains an ongoing challenge for every pediatric intensive care unit team member.
    Pediatric Clinics of North America 07/2008; 55(3):791-804, xiii. DOI:10.1016/j.pcl.2008.02.008 · 2.12 Impact Factor
Show more