Article

Survey of Differentially Methylated Promoters in Prostate Cancer Cell Lines

Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, 10835 Road to the Cure, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Neoplasia (Impact Factor: 5.4). 09/2005; 7(8):748-60. DOI: 10.1593/neo.05289
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT DNA methylation and copy number in the genomes of three immortalized prostate epithelial and five cancer cell lines (LNCaP, PC3, PC3M, PC3M-Pro4, and PC3M-LN4) were compared using a microarray-based technique. Genomic DNA is cut with a methylation-sensitive enzyme HpaII, followed by linker ligation, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, labeling, and hybridization to an array of promoter sequences. Only those parts of the genomic DNA that have unmethylated restriction sites within a few hundred base pairs generate PCR products detectable on an array. Of 2732 promoter sequences on a test array, 504 (18.5%) showed differential hybridization between immortalized prostate epithelial and cancer cell lines. Among candidate hypermethylated genes in cancer-derived lines, there were eight (CD44, CDKN1A, ESR1, PLAU, RARB, SFN, TNFRSF6, and TSPY) previously observed in prostate cancer and 13 previously known methylation targets in other cancers (ARHI, bcl-2, BRCA1, CDKN2C, GADD45A, MTAP, PGR, SLC26A4, SPARC, SYK, TJP2, UCHL1, and WIT-1). The majority of genes that appear to be both differentially methylated and differentially regulated between prostate epithelial and cancer cell lines are novel methylation targets, including PAK6, RAD50, TLX3, PIR51, MAP2K5, INSR, FBN1, and GG2-1, representing a rich new source of candidate genes used to study the role of DNA methylation in prostate tumors.

0 Followers
 · 
132 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advanced prostate cancers, initially sensitive to androgen deprivation therapy, frequently progress to the castration-resistant prostate cancer phenotype (CRPC) through mechanisms not yet fully understood. In this study we investigated mitochondrial involvement in the establishment of refractoriness to hormone therapy. Two human prostate cancer cell lines were used, the parental LNCaP and the resistant LNCaP-Rbic, the latter generated after continuous exposure to 20 μM of (R)-bicalutamide, the active enantiomer of Casodex®. We observed a significant decrease in mtDNA content and a lower expression of 8 mitochondria-encoded gene transcripts involved in respiratory chain complexes in both cell lines. We also found that (R)-bicalutamide differentially modulated dynamin-related protein (Drp-1) expression in LNCaP and LNCaP-Rbic cells. These data seem to indicate that the androgen-independent phenotype in our experimental model was due, at least in part, to alterations in mitochondrial dynamics and to a breakdown in the Drp-1-mediated mitochondrial network.
    Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 01/2014; 382(1):314–324. DOI:10.1016/j.mce.2013.10.022 · 4.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prostate cancer preferentially metastasizes to bone, which is rich in structural and matricellular proteins capable of altering prostate cancer progression. This study explores the role of the bone stromal matricellular protein SPARC (osteonectin/BM-40) in the progression of bone metastatic prostate cancer. Quantification of bone destruction analyzed by micro-computed tomography showed augmented osteoclastic resorption, characterized by decreases in several morphometric bone parameters in SPARC knock out (KO) tibiae harboring RM1 murine prostate cancer cells compared with wild type (WT) animals. Tumor progression stimulated osteoclast formation, which was augmented in SPARC KO mice. In vitro differentiation of SPARC KO osteoclasts indicated accelerated progenitor expansion and formation of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive osteoclast-like cells with increased resorptive capacity, a mechanism resulting in enhanced tumor-induced bone loss in vivo. Whereas altered bone structure due to SPARC KO played a role in increased osteolysis, the enhanced osteolysis was primarily the result of increased resorption by SPARC KO osteoclasts. Our findings indicate that bone stromal SPARC suppresses tumor-induced bone lesion expansion by limiting osteoclast maturation and function.
    Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) 01/2011; 13(1):31-9. DOI:10.1593/neo.10998 · 5.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Promoter DNA methylation of CpG islands is an important epigenetic mechanism in cancer development. We have characterized the promoter methylation profile of 82 genes in three prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP, PC3, and DU145) and two normal prostate cell lines (RWPE1 and RWPE2). The methylation pattern was analyzed using a Panomics gene array system that consists of immobilized probes of known gene promoters on a nitrocellulose membrane. Methylation binding protein-purified methylated DNA was hybridized on the membrane and detected by the chemiluminescence method. We analyzed methylation profile in normal (RWPE1) versus cancerous cells and androgen receptor (AR)-sensitive (LNCaP) versus AR-negative cells (DU145 and PC3). Our study shows that >50% of the genes were hypermethylated in prostate cancer cells compared with 13% in normal cell lines. Among these were the tumor suppressor (RB, TMS1, DAPK, RBL1, PAX6, and FHIT), cell cycle (p27KIP1 and CDKN2A), transporters (MDR1, MLC1, and IGRP), and transcription factor (STAT1, CIITA, MYOD, and NPAT) genes. Relative methylation pattern shows that most of these genes were methylated from 5-fold to >10-fold compared with the normal prostate cells. In addition, promoter methylation was detected for the first time in target genes such as RIOK3, STAT5, CASP8, SRBC, GAGE1, and NPAT. A significant difference in methylation pattern was observed between AR-sensitive versus AR-negative cancer cells for the following genes: CASP8, GPC3, CD14, MGMT, IGRP, MDR1, CDKN2A, GATA3, and IFN. In summary, our study identified candidate genes that are methylated in prostate cancer.
    Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 01/2010; 9(1):33-45. DOI:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0486 · 6.11 Impact Factor